Evaluating Hemopatch in Reducing Seroma Related Complications Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: a Pilot Study (HEIDI)

To evaluate if the use of Hemopatch in axillary lymph node dissection shows potential in reducing clinically significant seroma and seroma related complications, which might serve as a basis for a randomized controlled trial.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Seroma; Axillary Lymph Node Dissection; ALND; Axillary Clearance
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Hemopatch

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has reduced the number of patients needing to undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, axillary lymph node dissection is part of curative therapy for a large group of patients with advanced invasive breast cancers and melanoma. Seroma may cause symptomatic discomfort requiring needle aspiration and is often associated with infection, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, persistent fibrotic encapsulated seromas and may even delay adjuvant therapies [1]. Therefore, extensive research in finding the best technique in reducing seroma is needed.

Substances intended to seal small blood vessels by triggering collagen and fibrinogen synthesis supporting surgical hemostasis, are assumed to be able to contribute to sealing of these lymphatic vessels. Contradicting results were found in the effect of several fibrin-glue coated collagen patches [2-5] and fibrin glue [6,7]. Furthermore, the use of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure) in axillary dissection showed no significant reduction in rate of aspiration of seroma [8].

This pilot study is intended to assess the value of a haemostatic sealant (Hemopatch), a pad of collagen derived from bovine dermis, coated with NHS-PEG (pentaerythritol polyethylene glycol ether tetra-succinimidyl glutarate), in reducing seroma related complications after ALND with the advantage that this sealant is pliable and flexible.

Objective:

To evaluate if the use of Hemopatch in axillary lymph node dissection shows potential in reducing clinically significant seroma and seroma related complications, which might serve as a basis for a randomized controlled trial.

Study design:

A prospective cohort will be compared to a historical control group. Eighteen consecutive patients will undergo axillary lymph node dissection and after completion of lymphadenectomy, Hemopatch will be applied to the axillary surgical field. These results will be compared to the results of a historical control group consisting of 46 patients who have undergone ALND without the Hemopatch between January 2014 and December 2018.

Follow-up will be conducted for three months postoperatively.

Study population:

Patients of 18 years or older, diagnosed with stage III melanoma or breast cancer and indication for wide local excision (WLE) and/or axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND).

Intervention (if applicable):

Application of Hemopatch after standard axillary lymph node dissection.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Proportion of patients treated with Hemopatch who develop clinically significant seroma.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

Patients will be informed about the study before inclusion in the outpatient clinic. Informed consent will be obtained in the outpatient clinic a week after patients were initially informed. Postoperative check-ups will be done more frequently. Standard postoperative check-ups are planned at one week and three months. Additional study postoperative check-up will be performed at six weeks. Therefore, patients will be required to undergo one additional check-up. During out patients' visits, the wound will be evaluated and patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire. Application of the Hemopatch is expected to reduce clinically significant seroma after ALND. The only potential risk for the patient is that the Hemopatch is ineffective.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 62
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Netherlands
  • Limburg
    • Sittard, Limburg, Netherlands, 6162 BG
      • Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male and female patients of 18 years or older.
• Patients with melanoma and indication for axillary lymph node dissection.
• Patients with breast cancer and indication for breast conserving therapy and axillary lymph node dissection
• Patients with an indication for secondary axillary lymph node dissection.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with breast cancer who have an indication for modified radical mastectomy.
• Unable to comprehend implications and extent of study and sign for informed consent
• Pregnant women
• Patients included in another breast related clinical trial

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
• Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Conventional; Historical cohort of patients that underwent axillary clearance without hemopatch.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention; Prospective cohort of patient undergoing axillary clearance with hemopatch	Device: Hemopatch; Before closure of the wound this hemostatic sealant (Hemopatch), a pad of collagen derived from bovine dermis will be applied in the axilla

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Proportion of patients treated with Hemopatch who develop clinically significant seroma during the first three post-operative months	Proportion of patients treated with Hemopatch who develop clinically significant seroma during the first three post-operative months. Clinically significant seroma defined as: Wound healing is at risk due to seroma (wound break down, seroma leakage, necrosis) and possibly operative debriding of the wound or use of vacuum assisted wound therapy is necessary.; The presence of discomfort or pain caused by large amounts of seroma, characterised by tenseness of the skin and aspiration is necessary; The presence of contaminated/ infected seroma, and aspiration is necessary to treat infection. All patients that undergo seroma aspiration due to infection will also be treated with a one week course of Augmentin 625 mg 3 times daily.; Seroma for which incision and drainage is necessary to treat abscess or infection.	During the first three postoperative months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Surgical site infection (SSI) rate	Surgical site infection (SSI) rate, defined as redness, pain, heat or swelling at the site of the incision or by the drainage of pus. Infection rate will be measured by A) the need for antibiotics, B) seroma aspiration due to infection or C) surgical drainage during the first three postoperative months.	During the first three postoperative months
The number of outpatient department visits	Number of unplanned visits to the ER or outpatient clinic. Planned visits are standard follow-up outpatient clinic visits which are defined preoperatively. Unplanned visits are defined as any visit to the outpatient clinic which is necessary due to an adverse event.	During the first three postoperative months
Number of days before removal of axillary drainage and axillary drainage output.	Number of days before removal of axillary drainage and axillary drainage output. According to current guidelines the drain is always removed no later than five days, earlier if drain output is < 50 ml/ 24 hours	During the first three postoperative months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ACTUAL): June 16, 2020
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): June 1, 2021
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 2, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 2, 2019
• First Posted (ACTUAL): December 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): September 24, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 23, 2021
• Last Verified: September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Inflammation; Seroma
• Other Study ID Numbers: METCZ20190124

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No