Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Burn Scar Charateristics

December 12, 2019 updated by: Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital

Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Burn Scar Charateristics: A Retrospective Study

No study has investigated the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on hypertrophic scar characteristics. Thus, this study aimed to ascertain the effects ESWT on burn scars. The investigators retrospectively reviewed burn patients who had undergone autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) with same artificial dermis between January 2012 and September 2019.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

No study has investigated the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on hypertrophic scar characteristics. Thus, this study aimed to ascertain the effects ESWT on burn scars. The investigators retrospectively reviewed burn patients who had undergone autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) with same artificial dermis between January 2012 and September 2019. The ESWT group (n=17) received shock waves with low-energy flux density (0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2). The interval between treatments is a 1-week. The ESWT group also received standard treatment. The control group (n=18) only received standard treatment. We reviewed skin characteristics before and after 6 treatment sessions for both groups. The investigators checked skin charateristics(erythema, transepidermal water loss, sebum level, and elasticity). The investigators expect that ESWT is effective for significantly improving burn-associated scar characteristics and may be used for managing burn patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Yeong-deungpo-Dong
      • Seoul, Yeong-deungpo-Dong, Korea, Republic of, 150-719
        • Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

  • This study was a retrospective review of 35 patients who had undergone STSG using Matriderm® (MeSkin Solution Dr. Suwelack AG, Billerbeck, Germany) between January 2012 and September 2019.
  • The subjects who were admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital were enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a retrospective review of 35 patients who had undergone STSG between January 2012 and September 2019
  • limited to the upper extremities(the upper arm, forearm, and hand)
  • the scars which undergone STSG with same artificial dermis using Matriderm® (MeSkin Solution Dr. Suwelack AG, Billerbeck, Germany)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not evaluated serial assessments
  • below 18 years age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy group
The ESWT group received shock waves with low-energy flux density (0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2). The interval between treatments is a 1-week. To evaluate the effect of ESWT, we reviewed the skin test results (thickness, melanin, erythema, TEWL, sebum, and skin elasticity levels) immediately before ESWT and immediately after the sixth session. And also the ESWT group received the standard treatment, which involved medication, scar lubrication, burn rehabilitation massage therapy, and physical therapy.
ESWT was performed around the primary treatment site at 100 impulses/cm2, an energy flux density(EFD) of 0.05 to 0.30 mJ/mm2, frequency of 4Hz, and 1000 to 2000 impulses were administered at 1-week intervals for 6 sessions.
conventional therapy without extracorporeal shock wave therapy
Conventional therapy group received the standard treatment, which involved medication, scar lubrication, burn rehabilitation massage therapy, and physical therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
scar thickness
Time Frame: 6 weeks
hypertrophic scar thickness check using ultrasonic wave equipment (128 BW1 Medison, Korea).
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
scar erythema
Time Frame: 6 weeks
pigementation and erythema check using Mexameter® (MX18, Courage-Khazaka Electronics GmbH, Germany). The higher values indicating a darker and redder skin.
6 weeks
scar transepidermal water loss(TEWL)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
TEWL measured with a Tewameter® (Courage-Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Germany), which is used for evaluating water evaporation. The higher values indicating a skin dryness.
6 weeks
Sebum
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Sebum in the scars was measured with the Sebumeter® (Courage-Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Germany). The measurement is based on the principle of grease-spot photometry using a cassette with its special tape. A microprocessor calculates the result, which is shown on the display in mg/cm2.
6 weeks
Elasticity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Elasticity was measured using Cutometer SEM 580® (Courage-Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany), which applies negative pressure (450 mbar) on the skin. The numeric values (mm) of the skin's distortion is presented as the elasticity. Two seconds of negative pressure of 450 mbar is followed by 2 s of recess, and this consists of a complete cycle. Three measurement cycles were conducted, and the average values were obtained. The higher values present the higher elasticity.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HangangSHH-9

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burn Scar

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Subscribe