Improving Rhode Island's Tuberculosis Preventive Services in Primary Care

March 26, 2022 updated by: Daria Szkwarko, Kent Hospital, Rhode Island

Improving Rhode Island's Tuberculosis Preventive Services in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of an Innovative Telementoring Model

This study explores primary care team members' knowledge, attitudinal, and skill gaps related to LTBI testing and treatment. The gaps identified will inform the design of a survey and telementoring educational program (TB infection ECHO course). The EMR data query will further explore the reach of the ECHO model. The hypothesis for this study is that the TB infection ECHO course will be feasible, will have a significant impact on primary care provider participants' learning and performance related to LTBI testing and treatment in their primary care practices, and will increase the number of LTBI tests and treatment prescribed in primary care.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This pilot study will use a mixed-methods design called an exploratory sequential translational research design. In this type of study design, the initial qualitative phase informs the design of an intervention (in this case a TB infection ECHO) and an instrument (in this case structured surveys) to study the intervention. The third phase implements the designed intervention and/or instrument to collect data and quantitatively assess the outcomes of interest (in this case feasibility and impact). The final aspect of the third phase explores an EMR data query to assess the reach of the intervention (providers' testing and treatment in the real world). In Aim 1, 30 primary care team members from our Brown Family Medicine, Care New England, and federally qualified health center networks will be purposively sampled to undergo key informant interviews regarding LTBI testing and treatment knowledge, attitudinal, and skill gaps. Questions will be asked to ascertain gaps throughout the entire latent TB infection care cascade. The results from Aim 1 will be used to design the survey instrument and the curriculum for an innovative, telementoring program (TB infection ECHO). In Aim 2, at least 20 additional primary care team members will be recruited to participate in a virtual six-month TB infection ECHO course. Participants will complete quantitative surveys before and after the course as well as post-session surveys following each session. Survey questions will assess feasibility measures related to process, resources, and management and impact measures related to learning and performance. Paired data from pre- and post-course surveys will be analyzed accordingly depending on the distribution of results. In Aim 3, data will be extracted from two ECHO participants' clinic sites before, during, and after ECHO implementation. Data will include information about LTBI testing and treatment to understand the reach and impact of the intervention of providers' testing and treatment behavior. This study will lead to an ECHO research framework that can be used for future ECHO courses that address other diseases in Rhode Island.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhode Island
      • Pawtucket, Rhode Island, United States, 02860
        • Brown Family Medicine Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 18 years of age
  • Primary care team members in Rhode Island including doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, or other healthcare providers who are involved in primary care.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years of age
  • Primary care team members who do not primarily work in Rhode Island

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Qualitative

Specific Aim 1: Explore the specific knowledge, attitudinal, and skills gaps to TB infection testing and treatment among primary care team members in RI through qualitative key informant interviews.

In Aim 1, 30 primary care team members from the Brown Family Medicine and Care New England networks will be purposively sampled to undergo key informant interviews regarding TB infection testing and treatment knowledge, attitudinal, and skill gaps. Questions will be asked to ascertain gaps throughout the entire latent TB infection care cascade. The results from Aim 1 will be used to design the survey instrument and the curriculum for an innovative, telementoring program (TB infection ECHO).

Other: Quantitative
Specific Aim 2: Design and evaluate an evidence-based telementoring intervention (ECHO model) that addresses the identified TB infection gaps in Aim 1, and evaluate this model for feasibility as well as its impact on primary care team member knowledge and TB infection testing and treatment in RI. 20 primary care team members will be recruited to participate in a virtual six-month TB infection ECHO course. Participants will complete quantitative surveys before and after the course as well as post-session surveys following each session. Survey questions will assess feasibility measures related to process, resources, and management and impact measures related to learning and performance. Paired data from pre- and post-course surveys will be analyzed accordingly depending on the distribution of results.
A six-month virtual telementoring course regarding TB infection testing and treatment that incorporates didactics, case presentation, and discussion
Other: Retrospective chart review
Pilot a retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) data review to examine RI primary care providers' testing and treatment before and after ECHO implementation and evaluate the model's reach. In Aim 3, data will be retrospectively extracted from two participants' clinics to research RI primary care providers' testing and treatment patterns before and after the ECHO course. The two clinics will be identified once Aim 2 is completed.
A six-month virtual telementoring course regarding TB infection testing and treatment that incorporates didactics, case presentation, and discussion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility: Participant Attendance
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Proportion of registered participants attending each ECHO session
Six-month ECHO course
Feasibility: Participant Retention
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Proportion of registered participants attending one of the last two ECHO sessions
Six-month ECHO course
Impact: Procedural knowledge
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Change in participants' confidence in knowing TB infection testing and treatment procedures based on a likert scale rating (1=not at all confident and 5=extremely confident) included in the pre- and post- structured surveys administered before and after the ECHO intervention.
Six-month ECHO course
Impact: Self- reported LTBI screening
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Change in participants' self-reported estimates of patients screened for TB infection. Participants will estimate their screening on a 5 item scale with 0 patients being the lowest and >50 patients being the highest. Change in scores will be calculated between the pre- and post- structured survey responses administered before and after the ECHO intervention.
Six-month ECHO course
Impact: Self- reported LTBI treatment
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Change in participants' self-reported estimates of patients treated for TB infection. Participants will estimate their TB treatment on a 5 item scale with 0 patients being the lowest and >50 patients being the highest. Change in scores will be calculated between the pre- and post- structured survey responses administered before and after the ECHO intervention.
Six-month ECHO course
Reach: LTBI testing
Time Frame: Three-months prior, ECHO course, three- months post
Proportion(# of TB tests/# of visits) of patients tested for LTBI in a health center population before, during and after ECHO implementation to assess providers' behavior change. This data will be obtained from an electronic medical record data query
Three-months prior, ECHO course, three- months post
Reach: LTBI treatment
Time Frame: Three-months prior, ECHO course, three- months post
Patient level LTBI treatment before, during and after ECHO implementation to assess providers' behavior change. Proportion(# of TB treatment initiated/# of patients diagnosed with LTBI) of patients treated for LTBI in a health center population before, during and after ECHO implementation to assess providers' behavior change. This data will be obtained from an electronic medical record data query.
Three-months prior, ECHO course, three- months post

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility: Case Submission
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Proportion of cases submitted on time during the ECHO course
Six-month ECHO course
Feasibility: ECHO session timing
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Proportion of participants' who agree that session timing was convenient. This will be collected monthly from post-session surveys via a likert scale (1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree)
Six-month ECHO course
Feasibility: Connectivity
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Proportion of participants' who agree that connectivity was adequate during the ECHO session. This will be collected monthly from post-session surveys via a likert scale (1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree)
Six-month ECHO course
Feasibility: Videoconferencing Equipment
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Proportion of participants' who agree that videoconferencing equipment was adequate during the ECHO session. This will be collected monthly from post-session surveys via a likert scale (1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree)
Six-month ECHO course
Feasibility: Content expert facilitation
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Proportion of participants' who agree that the quality of content expert facilitation was adequate during the ECHO session. This will be collected monthly from post-session surveys via a likert scale (1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree)
Six-month ECHO course
Feasibility: Communication with ECHO hub
Time Frame: Six-month ECHO course
Proportion of participants' who agree that the communication with the ECHO hub team was adequate during the ECHO session. This will be collected monthly from post-session surveys via a likert scale (1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree)
Six-month ECHO course

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 24, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Latent Tuberculosis

Clinical Trials on TB Infection ECHO

3
Subscribe