Diagnostic Accuracy of CAD4TB and C-reactive Protein Assay as Triage Tests for Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB TRIAGE+)

September 16, 2025 updated by: Klaus Reither

Prospective, Multicentre Evaluation of the Accuracy of CAD4TB and C-reactive Protein Assay as Triage Tests for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Presumptive Adult TB Patients (TB TRIAGE+ Accuracy)

In the TB TRIAGE+ ACCURACY study, the accuracy of the following products will be determined:

  • CAD4TB (Delft Imaging System, NL), a digital chest x-ray analysis software
  • Afinion CRP assay (Alere Afinion, USA), which detects a cytokine induced acute phase protein

CAD4TB and the C-reactive protein assay are two tests with great potential of becoming a triage test for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). These potential triage tests for TB are intended to serve as rule-out tests with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value.

Before impact and cost-effectiveness of new TB triage tests for intensified active case finding can be determined, the diagnostic test accuracy needs to be assessed in comparison to confirmatory reference tests. This accuracy study will define cut-off values for CAD4TB as well as for the Afinion CRP assay to be used in a future cluster-randomised trial on impact and cost-effectiveness of TB triage strategies for intensified active case finding in Lesotho and KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

A sub-study (detailed in a separate study protocol), hereafter called AHD-FEASIBILITY, explores the feasibility of implementing a series of point-of-care tests, including the new VISITECT CD4 Advanced Disease Test (Omega Diagnostics, UK) as part of the WHO-recommended advanced HIV Disease care package in the context of community-based HIV/TB campaigns.

Due to the coinciding pandemics and the overlapping symptoms of TB and COVID-19, it is critical to test for SARS-Cov-2 infections in the study population. In addition, this study will contribute to the evaluation of a novel SARS-Cov-2 antigen rapid diagnostic test (from the diagnostic pipeline of FIND) and CAD4COVID, a digital chest x-ray analysis software (Delft Imaging System, NL) in combination with differential white blood cell count.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, partially blinded, two-centre cross-sectional study in which the diagnostic test accuracy of CAD4TB and an Afinion CRP assay test for TB will be assessed at facility level by evaluating a sample of 1400 adults (age ≥18years) with one or more TB symptoms (WHO recommended four-symptom screening; cough, weight loss, night sweats, fever) of any duration.

Presumptive TB patients will be recruited (i) at the outpatient departments of the Butha-Buthe District Hospital (Butha-Buthe, Lesotho) and the Caluza Clinic (Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa) and (ii) during community-based health campaigns by SolidarMed in Lesotho and HSRC in South Africa. Participants will be enrolled after giving written informed consent.

Study procedures comprise the following (detailed in the schedule of events): collection of contact, anthropometric, demographic and clinical data, HIV testing and counselling per national guidelines, collection of capillary blood for HIV testing, Afinion CRP assay, differential white blood cell count, VISITECT CD4 Advanced Disease Test (if HIV-positive), CrAg Lateral Flow Assay (if HIV positive and CD4 count <200 cells/μl as per VISITECT CD4 Advanced Disease Test, and no history of cryptococcal meningitis treatment); collection of urine (if HIV positive) for Alere Determine TB LAM Ag test; chest radiography for CAD4TB and CAD4COVID analysis and remote expert reading; nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-Cov-2 real-time PCR and SARS-Cov-2 antigen test, collection of two spot sputa samples (S1,S2) for Xpert MTB/RIF, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (S1) and for mycobacterial culture [MGIT] (S2). At week 12 (±2weeks), we will contact each participant by phone and collect data on their vital status, and any TB treatment since enrolment. For individuals on TB treatment, further information, e.g. on reasons for empirical treatment, will be collected at the health facility the participant started TB treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Butha-Buthe, Lesotho
        • Butha-Buthe District Hospital
    • KwaZulu-Natal
      • Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
        • Caluza Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult presumptive TB cases (age ≥18years) with one or more TB symptoms (WHO recommended four-symptom screening; cough, weight loss, night sweats, fever) of any duration.

Presumptive TB patients will be recruited (i) at the outpatient departments of the Butha-Buthe District Hospital (Butha-Buthe, Lesotho) and the Caluza Clinic (Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa) and (ii) during community-based health campaigns by SolidarMed in Lesotho and HSRC in South Africa.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Willing and able to provide signed written consent or witnessed oral consent in the case of illiteracy, prior to undertaking any study-related procedure
  2. Adults (≥18 years)
  3. Any of the cardinal symptoms of TB (cough, weight loss, night sweats, fever) of any duration

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy (based on oral information from participant)
  2. Any condition for which participation in the study, as judged by the investigator, could compromise the well-being of the subject or prevent, limit or confound protocol specified assessments
  3. Critically sick patients who need immediate medical care
  4. Current anti-TB treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Adult presumptive TB cases
Adult presumptive TB cases (age ≥18years) with one or more TB symptoms (WHO recommended four-symptom screening; cough, weight loss, night sweats, fever) of any duration.

CAD4TB version 6 and 7: Software tool for detecting lung abnormalities in computer tomogram images (pulmonary abnormalities) and frontal chest radiograph images (tuberculosis abnormalities) ; availability is guaranteed by Delft Imaging System; EC 0344 Certificate (vs.6); CE mark pending (vs.7). Will be performed by a registered and qualified radiographer in accordance with national regulations.

Afinion AS100 Analyzer and Afinion CRP: In vitro diagnostic to determine the amount of CRP in human whole blood, serum or plasma; CE-mark ; Will be performed by qualified, GCP-trained study personnel.

CAD4COVID: Non-commercial product. Software tool for detecting pneumonia-related features to be expected in COVID-19 patients; availability is guaranteed by Delft Imaging System; CE certified. Will be performed by a registered and qualified radiographer/health professional in accordance with national regulations. Analysis in combination with differential white blood cell count.

SD Biosensor, STANDARDTM Q COVID-19 Ag Test (rapid chromatographic immunoassay for the qualitative detection of specific antigens to SARS-CoV-2)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine CAD4TB cut-off value
Time Frame: 15 months after first patient visit
Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) of CAD4TB against a composite microbiological reference standard (mycobacterial culture [MGIT] or Xpert MTB/RIF) to define an acceptable diagnostic cut-off value.
15 months after first patient visit
Determine Afinion CRP assay cut-off value
Time Frame: 15 months after first patient visit
Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) of Afinion CRP assay against a composite microbiological reference standard (mycobacterial culture [MGIT] or Xpert MTB/RIF) to define an acceptable diagnostic cut-off value.
15 months after first patient visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate CAD4TB ROC against reference standard
Time Frame: 15 months after first patient visit
Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) of CAD4TB against a single microbiological reference standard (mycobacterial culture [MGIT] alone, Xpert MTB/RIF alone, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra alone), against a composite reference standard and against a radiological reference standard
15 months after first patient visit
Evaluate Afinion CRP assay ROC against reference standard
Time Frame: 15 months after first patient visit
Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) of Afinion CRP assay against a single microbiological reference standard (mycobacterial culture [MGIT] alone, Xpert MTB/RIF alone, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra alone) and against a composite reference standard
15 months after first patient visit
Evaluate CAD4COVID and COVID-19 RDT ROC against reference standard
Time Frame: 15 months after first patient visit
Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) of CAD4COVID combined with differential white blood cell count and point estimates of sensitivity and specificity the novel SARS-Cov-2 antigen rapid diagnostic test, both against a single microbiological reference standard (SARS-Cov-2 real-time PCR)
15 months after first patient visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data will be stored securely in a way that allows future access for the research team. We will adhere to the FAIR Guiding Principles for data management and stewardship 20. After completion of the studies and after anonymization (e.g. replace subject identifier with a new random subject identifier), analysis datasets will be made publicly available in a timely manner on a non-commercial data platform according to the FAIR principles. The principles of data sharing will be explained in the informed consent form. All data will be owned by the Sponsor-Investigator and investigators of TB TRIAGE+, while a Data Access Committee will review all requests for data sharing.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

12 months after completion of the EDCTP-funded TB TRIAGE+ project

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The Executive Group of the TB TRIAGE+ project will establish a Data Access Committee (DAC). The DAC will review all requests for data sharing. After approval by the DAC, the final verified and anonymised datasets and support for analysis will be made available to all relevant stakeholders, both at local level (health facility, region and country) as well as international decision makers (e.g. WHO) and interested research groups in order to advance research in TB.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid-19

Clinical Trials on Accuracy of CAD4TB and Afinion CRP assay for pulmonary TB

Subscribe