Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Delirium Preventive Care Protocol

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Delirium Preventive Care Protocol for Hip Fracture Patients

The prospective, randomized controlled experimental trial investigates the effectiveness of delirium preventive care protocol for hip fracture patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled experimental trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of delirium preventive care protocol on pain, functional status, sleep quality and delirium prevention in patients with hip fracture.

This research was conducted at a training and research hospital's orthopedics and traumatology department. The study sample was compromised of 80 patients with hip fracture. Intervention and control groups were applied after block randomization. Study data was collected by using Patient Information Form, Mini-Cog Test, Confusion Assessment Method, Visual Analogue Scale, Barthel Index, Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form and Richards Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. The patients in the intervention group were provided with nursing care in accordance with the delirium preventive care protocol developed with the support of literature. In the control group, routine nursing care was provided in line with the clinical procedure. The data was analyzed by using number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, median, Interquartile Range, Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi square test, Fisher corrected chi-square test, ANOVA test, Paired Sample t test, Friedman test, Wilcoxon test and Cronbach α coefficient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06018
        • University of Heath Sciences, Gulhane Faculty of Nursing
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Faculty of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Planned surgery for hip fracture,
  • 65 years and older,
  • No communication problems in Turkish,
  • Without cognitive impairment,
  • Patients who volunteered to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who could not be evaluated by the investigator before the operation
  • Patients with dementia and Mini-Cog test less than 3 points
  • Patients with a history of cerebrovascular accident
  • Patients with severe comorbidity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

Participants who met the criteria for inclusion in the study and volunteered to participate in the study were divided into experimental and control groups by block randomization method.

After obtaining written informed consent, the Patient Information Form, Mini Nutritional Assessment- Short Form, Confusion Assessment Method, Barthel Index and Visual Analog Scale were applied to patients. Nursing care was applied to hip fracture patients in the experimental group in accordance with the care protocol developed to prevent delirium. Delirium preventive care protocol was consist of; psychosocial care, monitoring of oxygen saturation, prevention of dehydration, nutritional support, normal elimination, pain control, sleep regulation, avoidance of bladder catheterization and early mobilization.

Confusion Assessment Method, Barthel Index and Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire were repeated to patients on the first postoperative day and on the third day.

Nursing care was applied to hip fracture patients in the experimental group in accordance with the care protocol developed to prevent delirium. Delirium preventive care protocol was consist of; psychosocial care, monitoring of oxygen saturation, prevention of dehydration, nutritional support, normal elimination, pain control, sleep regulation, avoidance of bladder catheterization and early mobilization.

Confusion Assessment Method, Barthel Index and Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire were repeated to patients on the first postoperative day and on the third day.

No Intervention: Control Group
After obtaining written informed consent, the Patient Information Form, Mini Nutritional Assessment- Short Form, Confusion Assessment Method, Barthel Index and Visual Analog Scale were applied to patients. Routine nursing care was applied to hip fracture patients in the control group. Confusion Assessment Method, Barthel Index and Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire were repeated to patients on the first postoperative day and on the third day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ)
Time Frame: 4 minutes.

It was applied to patients at first admission to the clinic, on the first and third postoperative day. The scale developed by Richards in 1987; It consists of six items that assess the depth of night's sleep, the time to fall asleep, the frequency of waking up, the time to wake up, the quality of sleep and the noise level in the environment. Each item is evaluated on the chart from 0 to 100. A score of 0-25 indicates a very poor sleep and a score of '76 -100 indicates a very good sleep. The higher the scale score, the better the sleep quality of the patients.

The total sleep score is calculated by taking the average of the depth of sleep, the time to fall asleep, the frequency of waking up, the time to stay awake and the quality of sleep.

4 minutes.
Barthel Index (BI)
Time Frame: 5 minutes.
Patients filled at frst admission to the clinic, on the first and third postoperative day was developed in 1965 by Mahoney and Barthel. It is used to determine the level of independence of individuals in their activities. The Barthel Index measures the social and physical function of daily life and consists of 10 items that assess the individual's ability to meet daily functions (nutrition, bathing, personal care, dressing, toileting, mobility on flat surfaces, transfer, climbing stairs, bowel and bladder function) without assistance. Each item is scored between 0-15 (varies according to the question). Barthel Index total scores vary between 0-100; 0-20 points completely addiction; 21-61 points severe addiction; Moderate dependence of 62-90 points; 91-99 points mild addiction; 100 points explain independence. In the studies using the Barthel Index, 60 points were taken as the limit and scores above 60 explain the ability to function independently.
5 minutes.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 minute.
It was applied to patients at first admission to the clinic, on the first and third postoperative day. It is used to measure the severity of pain. It is easy to use and the same in every language. At the two ends of a ten-centimeter line, two end definitions of the parameter to be evaluated are written and the patient is asked to indicate where his or her condition is appropriate by drawing a line or by pointing or pointing (0: I have no pain, 10: I have unbearable pain). The length of the distance from the absence of pain to the location of the patient indicates the pain of the patient. Less than three of this numerical expression indicates mild pain, three to seven indicates moderate pain, and more than seven indicates severe pain.
1 minute.
Mini Nutritional Assesment- Short Form (MNA-SF)
Time Frame: 2 minutes.
It was applied to patients at first admission to the clinic for evaluating of malnutrition. Its use in the elderly is recommended by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). According to the screening score; 0-7 points indicate malnutrition, 8-11 points indicate malnutrition risk, 12-14 points indicate normal nutritional status.
2 minutes.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Confusion Assessment Method- Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
Time Frame: 5 minutes.
It was applied to patients at first admission to the clinic, on the first and third postoperative day and in cases of change of consciousness. The scale was developed by Ely et al in 2001. The scale consists of four items. In the first item, sudden changes in consciousness or fluctuation; In the second article, squeezing the hand with letter A in less than 12 in the attention assessment test tests the two most important signs of delirium, fluctuations in the level of consciousness and distortion of attention. In the third article, it is evaluated whether the thought organization is disrupted or not by four questions and a simple command. The fourth item is related to the assessment of consciousness level. According to this scale, the first two items and one of the third or fourth items must be positive for the diagnosis of delirium. CAM-ICU, which is the most widely used scale that best complies with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
5 minutes.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gulten Guvenc, Proffessor, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Faculty of Nursing

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Delirium

Clinical Trials on Delirium Preventive Care Protocol

Subscribe