Clinical Outcomes After Implementation of COntinuous Vital Sign Monitoring On the General Ward. (COCOMO)

September 6, 2022 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Clinical Outcomes After Implementation of Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring on the General Ward.

In 2018, continuous monitoring (CM) of 5 vital signs with a wearable device, including automated MEWS calculation within the EMR were introduced on the surgical and internal medicine ward of our hospital. Rather than taking the measurements manually, this enabled the nurses to periodically validate the continuously derived vital signs at the protocolled moments, and simultaneously get an automatically calculated MEWS reading,. Moreover, continuous vital sign monitoring provides single channel alarms and trends of the vital signs in between the regular measurement moments. Compared to periodic manual measurements and registration in the EMR, the continuous vital sign monitoring and automated MEWS calculations in the EMR may result in better identification of clinical deterioration, and may improve clinical outcome.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate changes in total hospital and ward stay, "Total Events" during admission (rapid response team (RRT) calls and unexpected intensive care unit (uICU) admissions and deaths) after implementation of CM on the regular surgical and internal medicine wards. Secondary objective is to evaluate changes in MEWS scores at the moment of the uICU admissions, length of hospital, ward and ICU stay and the proportion of RRT calls that results in a ICU admission.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3896

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
        • Radboudumc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult general ward patients of the GE-surgery and Internal Medicine wards of a Dutch tertiary academic hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission on Inclusion ward.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opt out of file study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
General Ward Inpatients 2017-2018
ALL General Ward Inpatients on our Gastro-Enterology Surgery ward and Internal Medicine ward in the period august 1st 2017-august 31st 2018.
General Ward Inpatients 2018-2019
ALL General Ward Inpatients on our Gastro-Enterology Surgery ward and Internal Medicine ward in the period august 1st 2018-august 31st 2019.
Wireless continuous vital sign monitoring (HR, RR, SBP/DBP, SAT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unexpected Intensive Care Unit Admissions
Time Frame: During ward admission, from moment of arival on ward till discharge or transfer, average of 4 days.
Unexpected Intensive Care Unit Admissions
During ward admission, from moment of arival on ward till discharge or transfer, average of 4 days.
Rapid Response Team Activations
Time Frame: During ward admission, from moment of arival on ward till discharge or transfer, average of 4 days.
Rapid Response Team Activations
During ward admission, from moment of arival on ward till discharge or transfer, average of 4 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of Stay
Time Frame: During ward, ICU and hospital admission, till discharge, transfer to other hospital or death. Average of 5 days.
Length of stay on the ward, ICU and Hospital stay as whole
During ward, ICU and hospital admission, till discharge, transfer to other hospital or death. Average of 5 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clinical Deterioration

Clinical Trials on Continuous Monitoring

Subscribe