Computational Psychiatric Approach to Depression

August 5, 2024 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Computational Psychiatric Approach for Prognosis of Medication-Resistant Depression

The purpose of this research is to investigate how the brain changes in patients undergoing electroconvulsive (ECT) treatment for depression. Subjects will be invited to be in this study because (1) they are a patient about to receive ECT treatment for depression, or (2) they are a patient diagnosed with depression and do not qualify for ECT treatment, or (3) they are a healthy adult volunteer with no history of depression.

All volunteers must be between the ages of 18-85. Participation in this research will involve three visits. Each visit will last about 3-4 hours. If the subject is a patient receiving ECT for depression the study team will schedule study visits to go along with patient treatment visits. If the subject is diagnosed with depression (not treatment-resistant depression) or are a healthy volunteer, their first visit will be scheduled at their convenience, followed by a second visit 1-3 months post visit one and a third visit 1-2 months post visit two, for a total of three research visits.

Participation in this research will involve playing simple computer games while the subject's brain is scanned with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, the study team will assess symptoms of depression using questionnaires. Patients receiving ECT will not experience any changes to their standard of care ECT treatment plan. Healthy and non-treatment resistant depressed volunteers will not undergo ECT treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The goal for this study will be to test the following overall hypotheses: (1) that adaptive decision-making processes are disrupted in patients with treatment-resistant depression, and (2) the neural and behavioral changes associated with treatment-resistant depression can be assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging paired with computationally constrained adaptive decision-making games.

The investigators will use computational modeling of incentivized decision-making tasks, brain imaging (functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI), and standard clinical assessments, to characterize patients referred to Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center for ECT. Characterization will occur over multiple visits to be aligned with the normal course of patient care.

Data collected may be used in hypothesis driven analyses to:

  1. classify treatment resistant depression versus healthy controls and non-treatment resistant depression
  2. predictors of ECT treatment success versus failure
  3. characterize brain and behavioral changes consistent with treatment success versus failure
  4. predict who will need maintenance ECT therapy
  5. determine what changes in decision-making behavior are apparent in patients who require ECT maintenance therapy versus those who do not.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who meet the criteria in standard-of-care evaluation for ECT treatment, clinically depressed patients (non-treatment-resistant), and healthy adults.

Description

For patients:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult volunteers (ages 18-85)
  • Treatment-resistant depressed patients must meet criteria in standard-of-care evaluation for ECT treatment
  • Clinically depressed patients must meet criteria in standard-of-care evaluation for depression.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who cannot have MRI scanning
  • Individuals not able to provide written consent and verbal assent
  • Individuals not able to understand task instructions or consent documents
  • Women who are pregnant

For healthy subject volunteers:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adult volunteers (ages 18-85)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with depression (regardless of treatment status)
  • Individuals who cannot have MRI scanning
  • Individuals not able to provide written consent and verbal assent
  • Individuals not able to understand task instructions or consent documents
  • Women who are pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
subjects with treatment-resistant depression
approximately 48 subjects with treatment-resistant depression will undergo (1) clinical assessments, (2) perform a computer-based decision-making task while (3) their brain activity is monitored using a 3T MRI scanner.

Behavioral tasks will be executed via a computer interface. Below, we provide an estimated timeline for each visit and subsequently provide detail for the relevant stages.

Each participant's visit will last approximately 4-5 hours. Each visit will consist of the following tasks (in this order):

Other Names:
  • computer-based decition making task
  • 3T MRI scan
healthy subjects
approximately 48 healthy subjects will undergo (1) clinical assessments, (2) perform a computer-based decision-making task while (3) their brain activity is monitored using a 3T MRI scanner.
subjects with non treatment-resistant depression
approximately 48 subjects with non-treatment-resistant depression will undergo (1) clinical assessments, (2) perform a computer-based decision-making task while (3) their brain activity is monitored using a 3T MRI scanner.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Brain scanning - Neural activation
Time Frame: Baseline
neural activation measured during functional MRI
Baseline
Functional Brain scanning - Neural activation
Time Frame: month 1
neural activation measured during functional MRI
month 1
Functional Brain scanning - Neural activation
Time Frame: month 2
neural activation measured during functional MRI
month 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensation Seeking Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
This scale is a 43-item. Total score 0-430, higher number denotes worse outcomes.
Baseline, month 1, month 2
Perceived Control of Internal States Scale (PCISS)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
The PCISS is an 18-item scale designed to measure respondents' perceptions of their ability to control their internal states and to moderate the impact of aversive events on their emotions, thoughts and physical well-being. Scores can range from 18 to 90, with high scores indicating higher levels of perceived control of internal states.
Baseline, month 1, month 2
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment.MoCA scores range between 0 and 30. A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal, the lower number denotes worse outcomes.
Baseline, month 1, month 2
Physical Risk Assessment Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
27 Items. Total score 0- 162, higher number denotes worse outcomes.
Baseline, month 1, month 2
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is an instrument for making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive disorders commonly. Total score 1-29, higher scores denote worse severity of depression.
Baseline, month 1, month 2
Hamilton Depression Inventory (HAM-D)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
The HAM-D is designed to rate the severity of depression in patients. Total score 0-54, higher scores denote worse severity of depression.
Baseline, month 1, month 2

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
The SHAPS is a self-administered questionnaire with 14 items assessing domains of pleasure response/hedonic experience. Total score ranges from 0-42 with higher scores indicating increased anhedonia.
Baseline, month 1, month 2
Positive Valence Systems Scale (PVSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
The PVSS is a self-administered 21-item questionnaire measuring the NIMH's Research Domain Criteria Positive Valence System Domain. Total score ranges from 1-189, with higher scores denoting increased response to rewards.
Baseline, month 1, month 2
Columbia Suicide Scale (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
The C-SSRS is designed to rate an individual's risk for suicide based on lifetime and recent ideations. Scores can range from no risk, low risk, moderate risk, and high risk.
Baseline, month 1, month 2
Apathy Motivation Index (AMI)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 2
The AMI is an 18-item self-report index of apathy and motivation in Behavioral, Social, and Emotional Domains. Total score in each domain is 0-24 with higher scores denoting increased apathy.
Baseline, month 1, month 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth T Kishida, PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on clinical assessments

Subscribe