- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04193033
Evaluation of Implementing FLOW (FLOW)
Evaluation of Implementing FLOW: Transitioning Stabilized Mental Health Patients to Management in Primary Care (PEC 19-302)
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Our study sites requested that we pause implementation due to clinical efforts and site disruption related to Covid-19. Date of study resumption is unclear.
Adequate access to mental health is one of the most important problems facing the VA and VISN 19. Mental health patients who are stabilized and recovered should be transitioned back to primary care to increase availability in mental health for new patients, and to signal to recovered patients that they are successfully recovered. Because there are currently no methods to identify who is recovered or tools and processes to assist in transitions, few patients 'graduate' mental health. The FLOW program consists of an algorithm to identify patients who are potentially appropriate for transition, a user-friendly online report to communicate this information to providers, materials to explain this process to patients and providers, and an electronic medical record (EMR) note template to document the transition. The investigators are partnering with VISN 19 to evaluate this program using a stepped wedge design with 9 sites randomly allocated into 3 steps in the wedge. Sites will receive an evidence-based implementation facilitation approach. The investigators will evaluate the number of patients transitioned, success of those transitions, and patient and provider satisfaction.
Specific aims for this proposal are:
To evaluate the impact of FLOW, using the evaluation framework RE-AIM, including:
- Reach of the program: % of clinic patients transitioned to PC using FLOW
- Effectiveness: successful transition to primary care and impact on clinic access for future patients
- Adoption: percent of providers in the selected clinics transitioning patients to primary care
- Implementation: use of all FLOW components
- Maintenance: sustainment of FLOW after withdrawal of external facilitation
- To evaluate structural and process implementation factors, including organizational readiness to change, staffing levels, interservice agreements about care, leadership support, and internal facilitation.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- This study uses site-level randomization
Sites must be VA sites with substantial numbers of mental health patients
- VA medical centers or large or very large community based outpatient clinics
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-VA sites and CBOCs smaller than large
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: FLOW intervention
Sites receive the FLOW program, including internal and external facilitation, use of the FLOW online report to identify patients, patient and provider education materials, a medical record template, and regular data tracking and feedback about the process.
|
The FLOW program, including internal and external facilitation, use of the FLOW online report to identify patients, patient and provider education materials, a medical record template, and regular data tracking and feedback about the process.
|
No Intervention: Waitlist until Time 2
Arm 2: In this stepped wedge design, sites will be randomized to receive the FLOW intervention at Time 1, or to be in a waitlist until Time 2.
|
|
No Intervention: Waitlist until Time 3
Arm 3: In this stepped wedge design, sites will be randomized to receive the FLOW intervention at Time 1, or to be in a waitlist until Time 3.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Reach: Percent of specialty mental health patients transitioned to primary care
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
|
Percent of mental health patients in each of the participating clinics who are transitioned to primary care through use of the FLOW intervention, based upon electronic medical record data documenting this transition
|
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
Effectiveness of intervention's impact on clinic access
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
|
Change in the VA publically reported metric "Percent of patients receiving an appointment within 7 days of the requested date" from baseline to 12 months
|
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
Adoption: Percent of mental health providers who use FLOW intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Percent of mental health providers who use the FLOW intervention for at least 1 patient, compared to the total number of mental health providers in the participating clinics
|
12 months
|
Implementation fidelity to the protocol
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Percent if all FLOW components implemented as designed, based upon the items in the FLOW implementation checklist
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Maintenance of Effectiveness of intervention's impact on clinic access
Time Frame: 12-24 months
|
Change in the VA publically reported metric "Percent of patients receiving an appointment within 7 days of the requested date" from 12 to 24 months
|
12-24 months
|
Maintenance of Implementation fidelity to the protocol
Time Frame: 12-24 months
|
Percent of all FLOW components implemented as designed, based upon the items in the FLOW implementation checklist, from 12 to 24 months
|
12-24 months
|
Maintenance of Adoption: percentage of mental health providers who use FLOW intervention
Time Frame: 12-24 months
|
Percent of mental health providers who use the FLOW intervention for at least 1 patient, compared to the total number of mental health providers in the participating clinics, from 12-24 months
|
12-24 months
|
Maintenance of Reach: percentage of specialty mental health patients transitioned to primary care
Time Frame: from 12-24 months
|
Percent of mental health patients in each of the participating clinics who are transitioned to primary care through use of the FLOW intervention, based upon electronic medical record data documenting this transition, during the maintenance period
|
from 12-24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Natalie E Hundt, PhD, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- PEX 19-004
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mental Health
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingMental Health Wellness 1 | Mental Well-being | Mental Health Issue | Precision Mental HealthHong Kong
-
King's College LondonCompletedMental Health Wellness 1 | Mental Health IssueUnited Kingdom
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedMental Health | Veterans Health | Rural HealthUnited States
-
Chapin Hall at the University of ChicagoUniversity of ConnecticutCompletedMental Health | Physical Health
-
National Taiwan Normal UniversityCompletedMental Health | Physical HealthTaiwan
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedMental Health DisordersUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedMental Health DisordersCongo
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologySt. Olavs HospitalCompletedMental Health DisordersNorway
-
University of WarwickKing's College London; KU Leuven; University Hospital, Montpellier; Erasmus Medical... and other collaboratorsUnknownMental Health Disorder | Mental Health ImpairmentIreland, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, Croatia, France, Italy
-
York UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); North York General HospitalCompletedMental Health DisordersCanada
Clinical Trials on FLOW intervention
-
University of HoustonBaylor College of MedicineCompleted
-
Samsung Medical CenterSeoul National University Hospital; Ulsan University Hospital; Keimyung University... and other collaboratorsCompletedIschemic Heart DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
University of StellenboschHarvard University; West Virginia UniversityRecruiting
-
Sheffield Hallam UniversityCompleted
-
Hôpital de VerdunNot yet recruitingHypercapnic Respiratory Failure | Acute Copd ExacerbationCanada
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterCompleted
-
Spanish Society of CardiologyRecruitingAngina, Stable | Coronary Microvascular Disease | Coronary Microvascular DysfunctionSpain
-
Shaare Zedek Medical CenterUnknown
-
Rush University Medical CenterHospital Vall d'HebronTerminatedHypoxemic Respiratory FailureSpain, United States
-
Gadjah Mada UniversityCompletedEffect of Endoscope Water Pump Flow RatesIndonesia