The Evaluation of Postoperative Antibiotics in Non-Infected Mandible Fractures

November 15, 2020 updated by: Nagi Demian, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of the study is to evaluate if postoperative antibiotic use in patients with mandible trauma reduce the risk of postoperative infections and does the benefit differ based on severity, soft tissue loss, other concomitant injuries, and medical problems

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of antibiotics postoperatively in non-infected mandible fractures compared to the lack of postoperative antibiotics in the same population.

The first outcome measure is infection. Evidence of infection includes persistent swelling, fever, recurrent swelling, erythema, and purulent discharge.

The second outcome measure is no infection. Absence of persistent swelling, fever, recurrent swelling, erythema, and purulent discharge.

Outcome measures will be assessed on follow-up visits: post op week 1, post op week 3, and post op week 6-8. Latest follow-up is up to 8 weeks. If the subject presents with any of the above mentioned symptoms during the 8 week post-op period, the subject will be considered positive for infection.

Prospective randomized trial: Control group will not receive any postoperative antibiotics other than what is accepted as preoperative prophylactic antibiotics as per current standards of care. Trial groups will receive a single post-operative dose administration of Unasyn 3g or Clindamycin 600mg (for penicillin allergies), then the patients in the trial group will be switched to oral Augmentin 875mg twice a day for 7 days (Amoxicillin and Clavulanic acid which is clinically interchangeable with Unasyn), or oral Clindamycin 150mg to 300mg four times a day for 7 days (for penicillin allergies). If the patient is discharged home prior to completing 7 days of oral antibiotic therapy, patient will receive prescription to finish the remaining doses of antibiotics for a total period of 7 days.

The patient will follow up post op week 1, post op week 3, and post op week 6-8. Latest follow-up is up to 8 weeks.

Patients will be monitored for any complications, including reaction to IV and oral antibiotics. Patient will assessed after the one-time post-op IV antibiotic dose and during their follow-up visits at weeks 1, 3, and 6-8.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

174

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Memorial Hermann Hospital
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Th University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All mandible fracture patients planned for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age - < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Fracture Site - closed / non-dentate eg. Condylar neck, edentulous
  • Soft Tissue Injury - > Grade 4 (GSW)
  • Allergic to all study drugs
  • Medical Problems

    1. Diabetes - Hb A1C > 10
    2. Immunologic compromise
    3. On Chemotherapy
  • Interval - Injury to Surgery - > 10days
  • Already receiving antibiotics for

    1. Another wound eg. Open fracture prophylaxis
    2. Documented / suspected infection
  • Inability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
Trial groups will receive a single post-operative dose administration of Unasyn 3g or Clindamycin 600mg (for penicillin allergies), then the patients in the trial group will be switched to oral Augmentin 875mg twice a day for 7 days (Amoxicillin and Clavulanic acid which is clinically interchangeable with Unasyn), or oral Clindamycin 150mg to 300mg four times a day for 7 days (for penicillin allergies). If the patient is discharged home prior to completing 7 days of oral antibiotic therapy, patient will receive prescription to finish the remaining doses of antibiotics for a total period of 7 days.
Trial groups will receive a single post-operative dose administration of Unasyn 3g or Clindamycin 600mg (for penicillin allergies)
Other Names:
  • UNasyn is the trade name and the genric name is Ampicillin and Sub lactam. Cleocin is a trade name and the generic name is clindamycin.
the patients in the trial group will be switched to oral Augmentin 875mg twice a day for 7 days, or oral Clindamycin 150mg to 300mg four times a day for 7 days (for penicillin allergies).
Other Names:
  • Augmentin is the trade name and the generic is Amoxicillin Clavulinate or clavulinic acid. Cleocin is the trade name and the generic is clindamycin.
Active Comparator: Control
Control group will not receive any postoperative antibiotics other than what is accepted as preoperative prophylactic antibiotics as per current standards of care.
Control group will not receive any postoperative antibiotics other than what is accepted as preoperative prophylactic antibiotics as per current standards of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of persistent swelling,
Time Frame: post treatment week1
post treatment week1
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of persistent swelling,
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of persistent swelling,
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of fever
Time Frame: post treatment week 1
post treatment week 1
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of fever
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of fever
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of recurrent swelling
Time Frame: post treatment week 1
post treatment week 1
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of recurrent swelling
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of recurrent swelling
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of erythema
Time Frame: post treatment week 1
post treatment week 1
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of erythema
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of erythema
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of purulent discharge
Time Frame: post treatment week 1
post treatment week 1
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of purulent discharge
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
Evidence of infection as measured by presence of purulent discharge
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of persistent swelling
Time Frame: post treatment week 1
post treatment week 1
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of persistent swelling
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of persistent swelling
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of fever
Time Frame: post treatment week 1
post treatment week 1
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of fever
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of fever
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of recurrent swelling
Time Frame: post treatment week 1
post treatment week 1
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of recurrent swelling
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of recurrent swelling
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of erythema
Time Frame: post treatment week 1
post treatment week 1
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of erythema
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of erythema
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of purulent discharge
Time Frame: post treatment week 1
post treatment week 1
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of purulent discharge
Time Frame: post treatment week 3
post treatment week 3
No evidence of infection as measured by absence of purulent discharge
Time Frame: post treatment week 6-8
post treatment week 6-8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nagi Demian, DDS/MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection

Clinical Trials on Antibiotic treatment (Unasyn or Cleocin)

3
Subscribe