Mechanisms of Affective Touch in Chronic Pain (MATCP)

April 1, 2024 updated by: Laura Case
This study compares how different types of touch found in massage therapies impact pain perception, and whether these effects differ in individuals with and without chronic pain. This study also examines psychological factors that may predict differences in touch perception in individuals with chronic pain. This research will improve our understanding of whether and how massage therapies can benefit pain and health, and whether this differs in people who suffer from chronic pain.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
        • Recruiting
        • ACTRI
        • Contact:
          • Phone Number: 858-534-1251

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ages 18-65
  2. fluent in English
  3. physician diagnosis of Fibromyalgia but no other chronic pain conditions (patients) or no evidence of chronic pain (healthy volunteers)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Sensory, motor, or anatomic differences or injuries relevant to study procedures
  2. Known anomalies of the central nervous system (including stroke, dementia, aneurysm, or personal history of psychosis)
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Inability to rate pain or sensations
  5. Major medical conditions such as kidney, liver, cardiovascular (hypertension, preexisting cardiac arrhythmia), autonomic, pulmonary, or neurological problems (e.g., seizure disorder) or a chronic systemic disease (e.g., diabetes).
  6. History of blood clots or first-degree family members with clotting disorders
  7. Current use of opiate medication(s)
  8. Contraindications to MRI if participating in pilot MRI study
  9. Unable to identify a heat stimulus 50C or lower that generates a rating of a 7 on our VAS scale
  10. History of fainting or seizures
  11. History of frostbite
  12. Open cut or sore on hand to be immersed in cold water bath
  13. Fracture of limb to be immersed
  14. History of Reynaud's phenomenon (hands get white, then blue on exposure to cold, then red on warming)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chronic pain levels using the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
The investigators will measure chronic pain levels using the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire. This measure will be included in a linear regression model to determine whether this measure significantly predicts differences in ratings of touch pleasantness.
Day 1
Trauma history using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
The investigators will measure trauma history using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. This measure will be included in a linear regression model to determine whether this measure significantly predicts differences in ratings of touch pleasantness.
Day 1
Current depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale without chronic pain
Time Frame: Day 1
The investigators will measure current depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. This measure will be included in a linear regression model to determine whether this measure significantly predicts differences in ratings of touch pleasantness.
Day 1
Ratings of affective touch
Time Frame: Day 1
Touch pleasant/unpleasantness ratings will be assessed in response to each sensory stimulus (brushing, tapping, and pressure) using a Visual Analog Scale with anchors of "no pleasantness" to "most pleasant imaginable." Affective touch perception is the difference in ratings between the affective and neutral touch conditions during the baseline testing session and will be compared between individuals with and without chronic pain.
Day 1
Ratings of Heat Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Day 1
Pain intensity will be measured during the baseline and post-tests in the affective-Conditioned Pain Modulation blocks. Pain intensity will be assessed with a Visual Analog Scale with anchors from "no pain " to "most intense pain imaginable." VAS pain ratings will be compared before the cold water bath.
Day 1
Ratings of Heat Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Day 2
Pain intensity will be measured during the baseline and post-tests in the affective-Conditioned Pain Modulation blocks. Pain intensity will be assessed with a Visual Analog Scale with anchors from "no pain " to "most intense pain imaginable." VAS pain ratings will be compared before and after blocks of affective touch stimuli .
Day 2
Ratings of Heat Pain Unpleasantness
Time Frame: Day 1
Pain unpleasantness will be measured during the baseline and post-tests in the affective-Conditioned Pain Modulation blocks. Pain intensity will be assessed with a Visual Analog Scale with anchors from "no unpleasantness" to "most unpleasant pain imaginable." VAS pain ratings will be compared before and after the cold water bath.
Day 1
Ratings of Heat Pain Unpleasantness
Time Frame: Day 2
Pain unpleasantness will be measured during the baseline and post-tests in the affective-Conditioned Pain Modulation blocks. Pain intensity will be assessed with a Visual Analog Scale with anchors from "no unpleasantness" to "most unpleasant pain imaginable." VAS pain ratings will be compared before and after blocks of affective touch stimuli.
Day 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Breathing rate
Time Frame: Day 1 and 2
Respiration rate will be measured during the baseline and during the affective touch and pain trials.
Day 1 and 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 191669
  • 4R00AT009466-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on affective touch

3
Subscribe