A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Imipenem and Tigecycline Versus Imipenem and Tigecycline With GM-CSF for the Management of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Presenting With Septic Shock.

Imipenem and Tigecycline Versus Imipenem and Tigecycline With GM-CSF for the Management of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Presenting With Septic Shock.

Study population: A total of 90 consecutive patients of decompensated cirrhosis of any etiology, presenting to the Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences with SBP with septic shock will be included.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial Study period: August 2019 to December 2021. Sample size: Assuming that the response rate is 90% with GM-CSF and 60% without GM-CSF after day 5. With alpha 5 and power 80,we need to enroll 76 cases (38 cases with each). Further assuming 20 % drop-out due to various reasons, it was decided to enroll 90 cases randomly allocated into two groups (i.e., 45 in each) by block randomization method by taking block size as 6. So for the present study, it was decided to enroll 90 cases in all.

Group A will be given Imipenem and Tigecycline. Patients with recent hospitalisation will be given Colistin in addition.

Group B will be given: To another group we will give Imipenem and Tigecycline and GMCSF.Patients with recent hospitalisation will be given Colistin in addition.

The dose of antibiotic will be given at dosage Inj Imipenem 1gm i.v. TDS Inj Tigecycline 100mg stat f/b 50mg i.v. OD Inj GM-CSF 500mcg s.c. OD Inj Colistin 9 MIU i.v. stat f/b 4.5 MIU i.v. BD Monitoring and assessment At the baseline, all patients will undergo investigational evaluation as described

Daily monitoring of following parameters:

  • Haemoglobin,
  • Total peripheral leucocyte counts,
  • Platelet counts,
  • Renal function tests
  • Liver function tests and
  • Chest X rays will be undertaken
  • Ascitic fluid analysis will be done on day 0, day 2 and day 5

Stopping rule:If the patient develops a TLC of more than 50,000, the dose of the GM CSF will be reduced to half and the treatment continued. If, even after the reduction, the TLC rises to more than 50,000, then the treatment will be stopped and the patient excluded.

Expected outcome of the project: Addition of GM-CSF to standard antibiotic regimen helps resolve SBP and improves outcome in decompensated liver cirrhotic patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110070
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) with shock in a cirrhotic
  2. Hospital acquired SBP with shock
  3. Difficult to treat SBP

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Refractory Shock
  2. Cardiac comorbidities (known Coronary Artery Disease)
  3. Chronic Kidney Disease on Maintenance Hemodialysis
  4. < 18 years.
  5. Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  6. Post liver transplant
  7. HIV + ve, Immunosuppressive therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Imipenem+Tigecycline+GM-CSF
Inj Imipenem 1gm i.v. TDS
Inj Tigecycline 100mg stat f/b 50mg i.v. OD
Inj GM-CSF 500mcg s.c. OD
Inj Colistin 9 MIU i.v. stat f/b 4.5 MIU i.v. BD
Active Comparator: Imipenem+Tigecycline
Inj Imipenem 1gm i.v. TDS
Inj Tigecycline 100mg stat f/b 50mg i.v. OD
Inj Colistin 9 MIU i.v. stat f/b 4.5 MIU i.v. BD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution of Spontaneous Bacterial peritonitis in both groups
Time Frame: Day 5
Response is defined by resolution of SBP in terms of total counts < 500,Neutrophil<250
Day 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reversal of shock in both groups
Time Frame: Day 2
Blood pressure more than 90/60 mmHg with no inotropes requirement
Day 2
Survival in both groups
Time Frame: Day 7
Day 7
Survival in both groups
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Change in ascitic fluid metabolites Nitric Oxide in both groups
Time Frame: Day 28
change is defined as percentage reduction in nitric oxide
Day 28
Change in ascitic fluid macrophage population in both groups
Time Frame: Day 28
change is defined as percentage reduction in macrophage population
Day 28
Development of Hepatic Encephalopathy in both groups.
Time Frame: Day 28
Hepatic Encephalopathy will be measured as per West Haven criteria
Day 28
Development of Acute Kidney Injury in both groups
Time Frame: Day 28
AKIN criteria will be used for Acute kidney injury
Day 28
Development of Pneumonia in both groups.
Time Frame: Day 28
Pneumonia will be confirmed based on imaging and clinically
Day 28
Development of organ failures in both groups.
Time Frame: Day 28
Organ failure will be as per APACHE score
Day 28
Development of coagulopathy in both groups.
Time Frame: Day 28
Coagulopathy is defined as INR > 1.5
Day 28
Resolution of Spontaneous Bacterial peritonitis in both groups
Time Frame: Day 2
Response is defined by resolution of SBP in terms of total counts < 500,Neutrophil<250
Day 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Clinical Trials on Imipenem

Subscribe