Short Versus Extended Antibiotic Treatment With a Carbapenem for High-risk Febrile Neutropenia in Hematology Patients With FUO (SHORT)

September 23, 2019 updated by: Nick de Jonge, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Short Versus Extended Antibiotic Treatment With a Carbapenem for High-risk Febrile Neutropenia in Hematology Patients With Fever of Unknown Origin: a Randomized Multicenter Non-inferiority Trial.

A multicenter open-label non-inferiority randomized clinical trial comparing the safety (non-inferiority) of short antibiotic treatment (72 hours) with an anti-pseudomonal carbapenem with regard to treatment failure in comparison with extended treatment (at least 9 days) of high-risk febrile neutropenia in hematology patients receiving standard antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Episodes of fever are very common in patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy treatment for malignant hematological disease. More than 80% of patients experience one or more episodes of fever after their first cycle of chemotherapy. Only 20-30% of these patients have a clinically documented focus and mostly include infections of skin, intestinal tract and lung, while at most 10-25% of these patients have microbiologically proven bacteremia during these episodes. Patients with malignant hematological diseases and intensive chemotherapy induced neutropenia are extremely prone to overwhelming bacterial infections. Therefore, empirical antibiotic treatment is initiated at the first occurrence of fever, even if no apparent cause for the fever is evident. Most protocols advice treatment with very broad-spectrum antibiotics, mostly anti-pseudomonal carbapenems or fourth generation anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins.

Prolonged continuation of treatment may induce bacterial resistance. In view of the possible emergence of bacterial resistance due to prolonged antibiotic administration, continuation until recovery of neutropenia is suboptimal because it is costly because of longer hospital admissions, higher antibiotics costs and more possible adverse reactions.

Recent observational data (Slobbe et al) has showed that in adult hematological patients with febrile neutropenia, discontinuation of empiric antibacterial therapy after three days can be safe if no infectious etiology can be found, even in cases with persistent fever. However no RCT has hitherto been performed to support this observational data.

This study compares the safety (non-inferiority) of short treatment (72 hours) versus extended treatment (at least 9 days) with an anti-pseudomonal carbapenem for hematology patients with unexplained high risk febrile neutropenia. We hypothesize that a more restrictive use of broad-spectrum antibiotic use of three days in unexplained fever in neutropenic hematology patients is non-inferior to the present extended use during at least 9 days which would lead to a more restrictive use of antibiotics and less multiresistant strains of bacteria, costs and hospitalization length in the future.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

276

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 HV
        • VU University Medical Center
      • The Hague, Netherlands
        • Haga ziekenhuis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with malignant hematological diseases being treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation;
  2. High-risk neutropenia (Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <0.5x109/L which is expected to last longer than 7 days);
  3. Fever (One single measured tympanic membrane temperature of >38.5°C or a temperature of >38.0°C during 2 subsequent measurements separated by at least 2 hours);
  4. Age 18 years or older;
  5. Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications to use of imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem such as allergy, previous severe side-effects or previous microbiological cultures with carbapenem-resistant microorganism(s).
  2. Corticosteroid use ≥10 mg per day prednisolone or equivalent for more than 3 consecutive day during the previous 7 days.
  3. Clinically or microbiologically documented infection.
  4. Symptoms of septic shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg unresponsive to fluid resuscitation and/or oliguria (urine production <500mL/day).
  5. Previous enrollment in this study during the same episode of neutropenia.
  6. Any critical illness for which Intensive Care Unit treatment is required.
  7. Legal incompetency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Short treatment
Discontinuation of imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem after 3x24 hours irrespective of presence of fever.
Discontinuation of imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem after 3x24 hours irrespective of presence of fever.
Other Names:
  • tienam (imipenem-cilastatin)
No Intervention: Extended treatment
Extended treatment with imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem for at least 6 more days. The treatment with a carbapenem will be continued until patients have been treated for at least 9x24 hours and have been afebrile (tympanic membrane temperature <38.0°C) for at least five consecutive days or until resolution of neutropenia (ANC > 0,5 x10^9/L), whichever comes first.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of patients with failed treatment
Time Frame: Between randomization (at 3x24 hours) and before 9x24hours after treatment initiation)

Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of one of the following events after 3x24 hours and before 9x24hours after treatment initiation with a carbapenem:

-A clinically or microbiologically documented carbapenem-sensitive infection; treatment.

Recurrence of fever after previous defervescence (tympanic temperature <38.0 °C during 24 hours) which is not attributable to administration of a blood product or to a drug reaction.

o In case of clinical doubt whether the fever is of infectious etiology, the recurrence of fever will be considered as failure.

Between randomization (at 3x24 hours) and before 9x24hours after treatment initiation)
Death/ARDS or Septic shock
Time Frame: From randomization until the end of neutropenia (neutrophil count >=0.5x10e9/L) up to 6 months after randomization.
The occurrence of death, ARDS/respiratory insufficiency, septic shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg and oliguria <500 mL/day) due to any cause.
From randomization until the end of neutropenia (neutrophil count >=0.5x10e9/L) up to 6 months after randomization.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality.
Time Frame: 1. From 3x24hours of treatment until the end of neutropenia. 2. Within 30 days after the end of neutropenia
1. From 3x24hours of treatment until the end of neutropenia. 2. Within 30 days after the end of neutropenia
Infection-related mortality.
Time Frame: 1. From 3x24hours of treatment until the end of neutropenia. 2.Within 30 days after recovery of neutropenia
1. From 3x24hours of treatment until the end of neutropenia. 2.Within 30 days after recovery of neutropenia
The length of hospitalization in days.
Time Frame: From admission until discharge, with an estimated average of 4 weeks
From admission until discharge, with an estimated average of 4 weeks
Treatment strategy failure
Time Frame: after 3x24hours of treatment with a carbapenem and until the end of the neutropenic episode

Treatment strategy failure is defined as occurrence of any of the following events after 3x24hours of treatment with a carbapenem and until the end of the neutropenic episode:

  1. Any clinically or microbiologically documented infection.
  2. The recurrence of fever after previous defervescence during neutropenia.
  3. Death, septic shock or ARDS/respiratory failure due to any cause
  4. Adverse drug-related events due to a carbapenem requiring (temporary) interruption of treatment, including but not exclusively: liver and kidney dysfunction, convulsion and allergic reactions.
  5. Unexpected re-admission within 30 days after discharge other than for planned chemotherapy or other elective treatment.
  6. Antibiotic or antifungal treatment within 30days after discharge other than standard antibiotic prophylaxis.
after 3x24hours of treatment with a carbapenem and until the end of the neutropenic episode
The total number of febrile episodes during neutropenia.
Time Frame: From the start of neutropenia (ANC<0.5x10^9) until the end of neutropenia, an expected average of 21 days
From the start of neutropenia (ANC<0.5x10^9) until the end of neutropenia, an expected average of 21 days
Time to defervescence
Time Frame: Onset of fever until defervenscence, an expected average of 5 days.

Fever is defined as one single measured tympanic membrane temperature of >38.5°C or a temperature of >38.0°C during 2 subsequent measurements separated by at least 2 hours.

Defervescence is defined as three times a tympanic membrane temperature <37.5 °C with a minimal measurement interval of at least 8 hours

Onset of fever until defervenscence, an expected average of 5 days.
Incidence and prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection
Time Frame: Onset of fever until 30 days after the end of neutropenia.
Onset of fever until 30 days after the end of neutropenia.
Candida spp. colonization in (surveillance) cultures
Time Frame: From onset of fever until 30 days after the end of neutropenia.
From onset of fever until 30 days after the end of neutropenia.
Cost of antimicrobial therapy per admission
Time Frame: From admission until discharge, with an estimated average of 4 weeks
From admission until discharge, with an estimated average of 4 weeks
The percentage of patients with a MASCC-score≥21 and treatment failure (defined as in primary endpoint)
Time Frame: From the onset of fever until the end of the neutropenic episode, with an estimated average of 21 days.
From the onset of fever until the end of the neutropenic episode, with an estimated average of 21 days.
The percentage of patients with mucositis and positive blood cultures or short treatment failure.
Time Frame: From onset of fever until 30 days after end of neutropenia.
From onset of fever until 30 days after end of neutropenia.
Bacterial resistance in blood cultures and surveillance cultures (including minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC)).
Time Frame: All previous cultures and cultures performed until 30 days after the end of neutropenia.
All previous cultures and cultures performed until 30 days after the end of neutropenia.
The incidence and prevalence of fungal, viral, or carbapenem-resistant (inherent/acquired) infections until the end of neutropenia
Time Frame: om the onset of fever until the end of the neutropenic episode, with an estimated average of 21 days.
om the onset of fever until the end of the neutropenic episode, with an estimated average of 21 days.
Late treatment failure
Time Frame: Between 9x24hours and 14x24hours after onset of treatment with a carbapemen.
Defined as primary endpoint.
Between 9x24hours and 14x24hours after onset of treatment with a carbapemen.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeroen JWM Janssen, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
  • Principal Investigator: Michiel A van Agtmael, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
  • Study Chair: Mark MH Kramer, Prof., MD, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
  • Study Chair: Sonja Zweegman, Prof.,MD, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 5, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Febrile Neutropenia

Clinical Trials on Discontinuation of imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem

3
Subscribe