WaveLight® EX500 Excimer Laser System for the Correction of Myopia Using InnovEyes™ in Conjunction With InnovEyes™ Sightmap

March 19, 2025 updated by: Alcon Research

Pivotal Trial of WaveLight® EX500 Excimer Laser System for the Correction of Myopia With and Without Astigmatism Using InnovEyes™ in Conjunction With InnovEyes™ Sightmap

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system for the correction of myopia with and without astigmatism using InnovEyes in conjunction with InnovEyes sightmap.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Qualified subjects will receive treatment in both eyes and be followed for 1 year. Subjects will be asked to attend a total of 9 visits (Screening, Day 0 Surgery, Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Year 1). The primary endpoints will be assessed at refractive stability, defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at 3 months after surgery when compared with the 1-month visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Total expected duration of subject participation is approximately 1 year. This study will be conducted in the United States.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

272

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92122
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
        • Price Vision Group
    • Maryland
      • Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815-7018
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64154
        • Alcon Investigative Site
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63017
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68135
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • South Carolina
      • Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57108
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75243
        • Alcon Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Myopia up to and including -11.00 D with or without astigmatism up to -4.50 D, with MRSE no more than -12.00 D
  • Best corrected photopic distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better
  • Uncorrected photopic distance visual acuity of 20/40 or worse
  • Stable refraction (within ± 0.50 D) as determined by MRSE for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or evidence of active or inactive corneal disease or retinal vascular disease, keratoconus or glaucoma (or suspect)
  • Previous intraocular or corneal surgery
  • Intent to have monovision treatment

Other protocol-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system
Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser with InnovEyes software in conjunction with InnovEyes sightmap
FDA approved stationary scanning-spot excimer laser system used during refractive surgery for the treatment of myopia, myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism. For this clinical study, the WaveLight EX500 software will be upgraded to include the InnovEyes treatment.
Procedure that reshapes the front part of the eye (cornea) so that light traveling through it is properly focused on the back part of the eye (retina). The procedure will be performed using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system and data obtained from the InnovEyes sightmap.
Non-contact ophthalmic diagnostic device that captures images of the eye and collects ocular data preoperatively to generate a patient-specific ablation profile for refractive correction surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/40 or Better (in Eyes With Preoperative Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 20/20 or Better) at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at a distance of 4 meters and reported in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight. Preoperatively, VA was assessed with correction in place. Postoperatively, VA was assessed with no correction in place. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within +/- 0.50 Diopter (D) at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3
A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive Stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Month 1, Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With MRSE Within +/- 1.00 D at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3
A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Month 1, Month 3
Percentage of Eyes That Achieve Refractive Stability Assessed as Change From Baseline in MRSE of Equal to or Less Than 1.0 D
Time Frame: Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Worse Than 20/40 (With BCDVA 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place. BCDVA was measured in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Loss of 2 Lines (10 Letters) or More From Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place and measured in logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution, where each line on the letter chart represents 0.1 Snellen and 0.0 logMAR equates to 20/20 Snellen, or normal distance eyesight. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With Increase of Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 Diopter (D) of Absolute Cylinder Compared to Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Manifest refractive astigmatism is the cylindrical portion of the subjective refraction. It is measured with ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With Non-flap Related Ocular Serious Adverse Events at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Up to Month 3
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product). Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Up to Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sr. Clinical Trial Lead, Surgical, Alcon Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RFP911-C001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system with InnovEyes sightmap

Subscribe