- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04219891
WaveLight® EX500 Excimer Laser System for the Correction of Myopia Using InnovEyes™ in Conjunction With InnovEyes™ Sightmap
March 19, 2025 updated by: Alcon Research
Pivotal Trial of WaveLight® EX500 Excimer Laser System for the Correction of Myopia With and Without Astigmatism Using InnovEyes™ in Conjunction With InnovEyes™ Sightmap
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system for the correction of myopia with and without astigmatism using InnovEyes in conjunction with InnovEyes sightmap.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
Qualified subjects will receive treatment in both eyes and be followed for 1 year.
Subjects will be asked to attend a total of 9 visits (Screening, Day 0 Surgery, Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Year 1).
The primary endpoints will be assessed at refractive stability, defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at 3 months after surgery when compared with the 1-month visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements.
Total expected duration of subject participation is approximately 1 year.
This study will be conducted in the United States.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
272
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92122
- Alcon Investigative Site
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
- Price Vision Group
-
-
Maryland
-
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815-7018
- Alcon Investigative Site
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64154
- Alcon Investigative Site
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63017
- Alcon Investigative Site
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68135
- Alcon Investigative Site
-
-
South Carolina
-
Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
- Alcon Investigative Site
-
-
South Dakota
-
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57108
- Alcon Investigative Site
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75243
- Alcon Investigative Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Myopia up to and including -11.00 D with or without astigmatism up to -4.50 D, with MRSE no more than -12.00 D
- Best corrected photopic distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better
- Uncorrected photopic distance visual acuity of 20/40 or worse
- Stable refraction (within ± 0.50 D) as determined by MRSE for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- History or evidence of active or inactive corneal disease or retinal vascular disease, keratoconus or glaucoma (or suspect)
- Previous intraocular or corneal surgery
- Intent to have monovision treatment
Other protocol-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system
Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser with InnovEyes software in conjunction with InnovEyes sightmap
|
FDA approved stationary scanning-spot excimer laser system used during refractive surgery for the treatment of myopia, myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism.
For this clinical study, the WaveLight EX500 software will be upgraded to include the InnovEyes treatment.
Procedure that reshapes the front part of the eye (cornea) so that light traveling through it is properly focused on the back part of the eye (retina).
The procedure will be performed using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system and data obtained from the InnovEyes sightmap.
Non-contact ophthalmic diagnostic device that captures images of the eye and collects ocular data preoperatively to generate a patient-specific ablation profile for refractive correction surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/40 or Better (in Eyes With Preoperative Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 20/20 or Better) at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
|
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at a distance of 4 meters and reported in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight.
Preoperatively, VA was assessed with correction in place.
Postoperatively, VA was assessed with no correction in place.
Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements.
Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit.
A higher percentage indicates a better outcome.
Both eyes contributed data to this analysis.
No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint.
This is a co-primary endpoint.
|
Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within +/- 0.50 Diopter (D) at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3
|
A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter.
The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters.
Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements.
Refractive Stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit.
A higher percentage indicates a better outcome.
Both eyes contributed data to this analysis.
No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint.
This is a co-primary endpoint.
|
Month 1, Month 3
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With MRSE Within +/- 1.00 D at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3
|
A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter.
The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters.
Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements.
Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit.
A higher percentage indicates a better outcome.
Both eyes contributed data to this analysis.
No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint.
This is a co-primary endpoint.
|
Month 1, Month 3
|
|
Percentage of Eyes That Achieve Refractive Stability Assessed as Change From Baseline in MRSE of Equal to or Less Than 1.0 D
Time Frame: Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
|
A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter.
The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters.
Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements.
Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit.
A higher percentage indicates a better outcome.
Both eyes contributed data to this analysis.
No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint.
This is a co-primary endpoint.
|
Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Worse Than 20/40 (With BCDVA 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
|
VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place.
BCDVA was measured in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight.
Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements.
Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit.
A lower percentage indicates a better outcome.
Both eyes contributed data to this analysis.
No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint.
This is a co-primary endpoint.
|
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Loss of 2 Lines (10 Letters) or More From Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
|
VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place and measured in logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution, where each line on the letter chart represents 0.1 Snellen and 0.0 logMAR equates to 20/20 Snellen, or normal distance eyesight.
Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements.
Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit.
A lower percentage indicates a better outcome.
Both eyes contributed data to this analysis.
No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint.
This is a co-primary endpoint.
|
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Increase of Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 Diopter (D) of Absolute Cylinder Compared to Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
|
Manifest refractive astigmatism is the cylindrical portion of the subjective refraction.
It is measured with ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters.
Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements.
Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit.
A lower percentage indicates a better outcome.
Both eyes contributed data to this analysis.
No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint.
This is a co-primary endpoint.
|
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Non-flap Related Ocular Serious Adverse Events at Refractive Stability
Time Frame: Up to Month 3
|
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product).
Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements.
Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit.
A lower percentage indicates a better outcome.
Both eyes contributed data to this analysis.
No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint.
This is a co-primary endpoint.
|
Up to Month 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Sr. Clinical Trial Lead, Surgical, Alcon Research
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 9, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 9, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
November 9, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 3, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
January 7, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 6, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 19, 2025
Last Verified
March 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RFP911-C001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Myopia
-
Tianjin Medical University Eye HospitalNot yet recruitingProgressive Myopia | Pediatric Myopia | Orthokeratology-related Myopia Progression
-
SightGlass Vision, Inc.RecruitingMyopia | Myopia Progression | Juvenile MyopiaUnited States
-
Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment CenterEnrolling by invitationMyopia, Child Myopia ProgressionChina
-
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Not yet recruitingMyopia | Myopia, ProgressiveChina
-
SightGlass Vision, Inc.Recruiting
-
Beijing Airdoc Technology Co., Ltd.Recruiting
-
Beijing Airdoc Technology Co., Ltd.The First People's Hospital of XuzhouRecruiting
-
Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment CenterActive, not recruiting
-
Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment CenterEnrolling by invitation
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridCooperativa de Ensino Superior, Politécnico e Universitário; Novovision; Instituto... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
Clinical Trials on WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system with InnovEyes sightmap
-
Alcon ResearchCompletedHyperopia | Hyperopic AstigmatismUnited States
-
59th Medical WingCompleted
-
Alcon, a Novartis CompanyTerminatedAstigmatism | MyopiaFrance
-
Alcon ResearchCompleted
-
AMO Development, LLCCompletedRefractive ErrorUnited States
-
University of FloridaSpectranetics CorporationWithdrawnBile Duct Obstruction | Biliary Tract Disease
-
Democritus University of ThraceCompleted
-
Jonathan BathUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaRecruitingAortic Aneurysm | Endovascular Aneurysm RepairUnited States