SMILE vs. LASIK Using Contoura With Phorcides

February 25, 2025 updated by: 59th Medical Wing

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of SMILE vs. LASIK Using Contoura With Phorcides

Subjects will undergo SMILE surgery in one eye and LASIK using Contoura with Phorcides on the contralateral eye to correct myopia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Once consented to participate in the study, subjects will have a comprehensive ocular examination to determine eligibility to undergo simultaneous SMILE surgery in one eye and LASIK using Contoura with Phorcides on the contralateral eye to correct myopia.The study objective is to compare the 6-month visual outcomes (i.e., visual acuity, contract sensitivity, high order aberrations), quality of vision (i.e., double vision, glare, starburst, halos, etc.) and dry eye symptoms of patients undergoing contralateral LASIK using Contoura with Phorcides and SMILE surgery. Surgical treatment will be randomized so there is a 50% chance to receive SMILE on the right eye and LASIK on the contralateral eye. Subjects will receive standard of care topical ophthalmic antibiotic and steroid drops. Visual outcomes and patient self-reported symptoms will be assessed at week 2, month 1, month 3, and month 6.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78236
        • Joint Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center at WHASC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and Females between the ages of 21 and 50
  • Nearsightedness between -2.00 diopters and -8.00 diopters
  • Have similar levels of nearsightedness in each eye (≤1.5D of difference between eyes)
  • Less than or equal to 3.00 diopters of astigmatism
  • Have similar levels of astigmatism in each eye (≤0.75D of difference between eyes)
  • Total spherical equivalent (SE) of no more than -8.0 D
  • Tricare Prime Beneficiary
  • Residing within 60 miles radius from Lackland AFB

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with corneal abnormal findings including signs of keratoconus, keratoconus suspect, abnormal corneal topography, epithelial basement membrane disease, pellucid marginal degeneration, corneal degenerations, progressive and unstable myopia, irregular or unstable corneal mires on central keratometry images, and patients whose corneal thickness would cause anticipated treatment would violate the posterior 250 microns (μm) of corneal stroma from the corneal endothelium.
  • Subjects with active collagen vascular, connective tissue, autoimmune or immunodeficiency diseases
  • Pregnant or nursing females
  • Systemic disease likely to affect wound healing, such as uncontrolled diabetes and severe atopy
  • Any ocular disease such as advanced/uncontrolled glaucoma, severe dry eye, active eye infection or inflammation, recent herpes eye infection or problems resulting from past infection.
  • 0.25 or 0.50 of manifest astigmatism in either eye
  • Taking the medication Isotretinoin (Accutane) or antimetabolites for any medical condition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: LASIK using Contoura with Phorcides
LASIK using Contoura with Phorcides in one eye.
LASIK Refractive Surgery Using Contura with Phorcides
Active Comparator: SMILE
small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) refractive surgery on the contralateral eye.
SMILE Refractive Surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of eyes with Uncorrected Visual Acuity of 20/16 or better at 6-month Post-Op
Time Frame: 6-month Post-Op
Post-operative uncorrected visual acuity of 20/16 or better measure with ETDRS chart; unit = percentage eyes with Uncorrected Visual Acuity
6-month Post-Op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in high contrast visual acuity at 6-month Post-Op
Time Frame: Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
Change in the mean uncorrected visual acuity (unit = logMAR) measure with ETDRS chart from baseline (pre-op) at 6 months post-op.
Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
Change in refractive error at 6-month Post-Op
Time Frame: Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
Change in the mean refractive error measure with phoropter (unit = diopters) from baseline (pre-op) at 6 months post-op.
Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in low contrast visual acuity at 6-month Post-Op
Time Frame: Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
Change in the mean low contrast visual acuity (unit = logMAR) measure with ETDRS 5% chart from baseline (pre-op) at 6 months post-op.
Change from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
Change in higher order aberrations at 6-month Post-Op
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
Change in the mean higher order aberrations (unit = root mean square) measure with iDesign 2.0 Refractive Studio from baseline (pre-op) at 6 months post-op.
Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
Change in mean score Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms and Satisfaction (PROWL-SS) Questionnaire at 6-month Post-Op
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
The PROWL-SS is a validated tool to assess self-reported symptoms and satisfaction after refractive surgery. Possible Satisfaction Score ranges from 1 (completely satisfied) to 6 (completely dissatisfied). Lower value indicates higher satisfaction. Possible Symptoms Score ranges from 1 (extremely bothersome) to 5 (not at all bothersome). Lower value indicates worse symptoms.
Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
Change in mean score Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire at 6-month Post-Op
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op
The SPEED is a validated tool to assess self-reported dry eye symptoms. Possible dry eye symptoms score ranges from 0 (never) to 3 (Constant). Higher value indicates worse dry eye symptoms.
Changes from baseline (pre-op) to 6-month Post-Op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: CHARISMA B EVANGELISTA, MD, 59th Medical Wing

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C.2023.052

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Astigmatism

Clinical Trials on WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System

Subscribe