- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04226300
Lap-assisted vs. US-Guided Visualization of TAP Blocks (LUV-TAP)
Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Ultrasound-Guided Visualization of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks like the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are useful for post-operative pain control and reducing opioid analgesics.(1-3) A recent meta-analysis of TAP blocks in adults demonstrated a reduction in post-operative opioid requirements, and improved pain scores.(2) Within the pediatric population, numerous other studies have confirmed the benefit of TAP blocks and their ability to lower pain scores, reduce opioid use and opioid-related side effects post-operatively.(4) While there have been many prospective randomized trials for ultrasound-guided TAP blocks (5-7), there has been limited evaluation of surgically-placed TAP blocks (8). There has been no published data evaluating or comparing surgically placed TAP blocks in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures. placed TAP blocks in pediatrics have not been examined in patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures.(4) Our pilot study was designed as a proof of concept, to demonstrate that ultrasound images could be used to verify the distribution of local anesthetic after a laparoscopically-assisted TAP block. The aim of this study is to continue using ultrasound to verify the location of laparoscopic-assisted TAP blocks, and compare the post-operative outcomes (pain scores, opioid use, etc.) to those who receive ultrasound-guided TAP blocks. We plan to do this in a prospective, randomized and semi-blinded fashion.
We hypothesize that (1) we will be able to accurately describe the location of the TAP block placed by both methods in more than 90% of cases; (2) laparoscopic-assisted TAP blocks will be as effective as ultrasound-guided TAP blocks in terms of managing/reducing post-operative pain scores and reducing the amount and frequency of postoperative opioid analgesia.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
- Lucille Packard Children's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients age 0-18 years who are undergoing laparoscopic surgery at Lucille Packard Children's Hospital
- Clinical indication for abdominal peripheral nerve block
Exclusion Criteria:
- conversion to open procedure
- allergy to local anesthetic
- multiple procedures planned with >1 surgical specialty
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Laparoscopic-Assisted
Surgeons will place TAP block laparoscopically using a camera prior to beginning a surgical procedure.
|
A transversus abdominis nerve block will be placed laparoscopically.
|
|
Active Comparator: Ultrasound-Guided
Anesthesiologists will use ultrasound to place TAP block prior to beginning a surgical procedure.
|
A transversus abdominis nerve block will be place by ultrasound
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block location
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Images of the TAP block will be taken and reviewed by anesthesiologists to document the location of the block
|
2 years
|
|
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
The Face Pain Scale (Hicks et.
al., 2001) is a self-reported scale that uses cartoon depictions of faces to quantify on a scale 0-10 scale how pain a child is experiencing at a given moment.
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stephanie Chao, MD, Stanford University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Siddiqui MR, Sajid MS, Uncles DR, Cheek L, Baig MK. A meta-analysis on the clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2011 Feb;23(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.05.008.
- Carney J, Finnerty O, Rauf J, Curley G, McDonnell JG, Laffey JG. Ipsilateral transversus abdominis plane block provides effective analgesia after appendectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Oct;111(4):998-1003. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181ee7bba. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
- Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H, Dahl JB. The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 May;54(5):529-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02215.x. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
- Fredrickson MJ, Paine C, Hamill J. Improved analgesia with the ilioinguinal block compared to the transversus abdominis plane block after pediatric inguinal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Nov;20(11):1022-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03432.x.
- Charlton S, Cyna AM, Middleton P, Griffiths JD. Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;(12):CD007705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007705.pub2.
- Ravichandran NT, Sistla SC, Kundra P, Ali SM, Dhanapal B, Galidevara I. Laparoscopic-assisted Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Ultrasonography-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Postlaparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain Relief: Randomized Controlled Trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):228-232. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000405.
- Mai CL, Young MJ, Quraishi SA. Clinical implications of the transversus abdominis plane block in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Sep;22(9):831-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03916.x.
- Sandeman DJ, Bennett M, Dilley AV, Perczuk A, Lim S, Kelly KJ. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jun;106(6):882-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer069. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 44988
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.