GM-CSF With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

April 15, 2026 updated by: Northside Hospital, Inc.

Phase II Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Sargramostim Post-Infusion of T-Replete HLA Mismatched Peripheral Blood Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cells and With Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Given the increased number of HLA-mismatched haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide performed each year and the high risk of infectious complications associated with this type of transplant, the investigators suggest that GM-CSF administration post-infusion of T-replete haploidentical stem cells and post-transplant cyclophosphamide can yield similar count recovery rates to G-CSF with a potential of lowering risk of infectious complications.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

38

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • Recruiting
        • Northside Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Scott Solomon, MD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Melhem Solh, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • H. Kent Holland, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Asad Bashey, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lawrence E Morris, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Availability of 5/10 to 8/10 matched related donor
  • KPS >/= 70%
  • CML, AML, MDS, ALL, CLL, HD, NHL, MPS/CMML, MM, any other hematologic condition deemed an eligible indication for allogeneic transplant by the treating center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor cardiac, pulmonary, liver, and renal function
  • HIV-positive
  • Patients who have a debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude them from giving informed consent
  • History of severe or serious allergic reaction to human GM-CSF or yeast-derived products

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GM-CSF post-transplant
Sargramostim (GM-CSF) will start on Day +5 and continue until ANC >1000 x3 days or >1500 x1 day. GM-CSF will be administered not less than 24 hours after the last dose of cyclophosphamide and will be given at a dose of 250mcg/m2/day as an infusion over 2 hours.
250mcg/m2/day IV starting Day +5
Other Names:
  • GM-CSF
Standard G-CSF given to those who decline to receive GM-CSF
Other Names:
  • G-CSF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients who achieved neutrophil engraftment at 20 days after the initiation of treatment.
Time Frame: 3 months after initial treatment
The aim of the study is to establish equivalent effectiveness of Sargramostim to a matched control cohort of G-CSF treated patients in time to achieve neutrophil (ANC >500 x3 days) post infusion of HLA-mismatched peripheral blood haploidentical stem cells with post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Patients will be followed for 3 months following the initiation of treatment to see engraftment numbers at 20 days after initial treatment.
3 months after initial treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
How many patients are still alive measured by overall survival at 12 months following the initiation of treatment.
Time Frame: 12 months following initiation of treatment
To estimate overall survival
12 months following initiation of treatment
How many patients have not relapsed measured by relapse rates at 12 months following the initiation of treatment.
Time Frame: 12 months following initiation of treatment
To estimate relapse rates
12 months following initiation of treatment
How many patients develop graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) measured by the incidence of GVHD at 12 months following initiation of treatment
Time Frame: 12 months following initiation of treatment
To estimate incidence of GVHD
12 months following initiation of treatment
How many patients have not relapsed measured by progression-free survival at 12 months following the initiation of treatment
Time Frame: 12 months following initiation of treatment
To estimate non-relapse mortality
12 months following initiation of treatment
How many patients died due to infections measured by the incidence and type of infections at 12 months following initiation of treatment
Time Frame: 12 months following initiation of treatment
To estimate infection-related mortality
12 months following initiation of treatment
How many patients died due to a treatment-related adverse events grade 2 or greater as assessed by CTCAE v.4.0
Time Frame: 12 months following initiation of treatment
To estimate event-free survival
12 months following initiation of treatment
Number of patients to achieve full donor chimerisms at Days 30, 50, 100, and 6 months post-transplant as measured by donor chimerism data
Time Frame: 12 months following initiation of treatment
To estimate graft failure
12 months following initiation of treatment
Number of patients that acquired an infection in the first 100-days post-transplant as measured by the incidence of infections
Time Frame: 12 months following initiation of treatment
To estimate the rate of infections
12 months following initiation of treatment
Number of patients achieving platelet engraftment as measured by platelets reaching 20,000 without transfusion for 7 days
Time Frame: 12 months following initiation of treatment
To assess time to platelet engraftment
12 months following initiation of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melhem Solh, MD, Northside Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 18, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 18, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transplant-Related Hematologic Malignancy

Clinical Trials on Sargramostim

Subscribe