The ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS)

April 26, 2022 updated by: Spaarne Gasthuis

The ATtune Knee Outcome Study: Prospective Evaluation of a Novel Uncemented Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty

To accomodate dissatisfied patients with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and improve outcomes, several knee systems have been developed. The cemented ATTUNE TKA shows superiority over other established knee systems at short-term, abating with longer follow-up. There have been no studies reporting on the results of the uncemented version of the ATTUNE. Therefore, the main objective of the current study was to report patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), survivorship and complications associated with the uncemented ATTUNE TKA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Every year, 1.5 million total knee arthroplasties (TKA) are performed worldwide in patients whose joints have been severely affected by osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or trauma, causing intense pain and loss of function. Due to the ageing society, these numbers are expected to have increased six-fold to 3.48 million cases annually by 2030. Even though joint replacement provides satisfactory and durable results for most patients, 20% is thought to still not be satisfied with their artificial joint. To accommodate this dissatisfied population and improve durability of implants even more, several knee systems have been developed over the years. One of the newest models is the ATTUNE knee system (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana, USA). One of the landmark features is a gradually reducing radius in the geometry of the femoral component, more closely mimicking the anatomical patellofemoral joint and facilitating more natural femoral rollback during flexion. Comparisons of the cemented ATTUNE with previous knee systems show promising results in terms of patellofemoral outcomes, but fail to demonstrate definitive superiority in terms of all patient reported outcomes. Clinical superiority of the ATTUNE tends to abate with longer follow-up, implicating a possible superiority in the short-term recovery and return to activities. There is no follow-up study reporting the results of the uncemented ATTUNE. Moreover, all previously cited studies report better patellofemoral outcomes with patellar resurfacing, making it still unclear whether the implicated superior design changes of the femoral component hold ground without patellar resurfacing.

The primary objective is to report survivorship, complications and patient reported outcome measures associated with the uncemented ATTUNE rotating platform knee system. Secondary objectives are (1) evaluate patient reported (patellofemoral) outcomes (2) assess return to work and sport after TKA (3) translate and validate the Dutch version of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale and (4) analyse psychologic factors (such as pain catastrophising and coping) and the impact on dissatisfaction following TKA.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

900

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Hoofddorp, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 2134 TM
        • Recruiting
        • Spaarne Gasthuis
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Peter A Nolte, Orthopedic Surgeon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 88 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with end-stage knee disease (e.g. knee osteoarthritis) warranting and able to undergo knee replacement therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • End-stage osteoarthritis of the knee warranting joint replacement therapy.
  • Indicated for an ATTUNE total knee system as part of regular clinical practice.
  • Capability and willingness to sign informed consent and comply with follow-up procedures.
  • Capable enough in Dutch or English to be able to understand study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to sign informed consent and comply with follow-up
  • Indication for primary revision arthroplasty
  • Absolute indication for cemented fixation (decreased bone stock/quality of spongiosa)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survivorship
Time Frame: 10 year
Calculated by determining revision rate. Septic, aseptic and all-cause revision rates will be calculated seperately.
10 year
Complication rate
Time Frame: 10 year
All substantial complications associated with total knee arthroplasty will be registered and reported
10 year
Forgotten Joint Score 12 (FJS-12)
Time Frame: 10 year
10 year
Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS)
Time Frame: 10 year
10 year
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale - Physical Function Short Form
Time Frame: 10 year
KOOS-PS
10 year
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 10 year
NRS on pain and satisfaction
10 year
EuroQol 5 Dimensions, 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)
Time Frame: 10 year
10 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30 second chair stand test (30sCST)
Time Frame: 1 year
The amount of times one can stand up and sit down from a chair in 30 seconds
1 year
40m Fast paced walk test (40m-FPWT)
Time Frame: 1 year
The amount of seconds one does to walk 40 meters.
1 year
Stair climb test (SCT)
Time Frame: 1 year
The time one takes to walk a set of stairs up and down.
1 year
Tegner activity rating scale
Time Frame: 1 year
1-item questionnaire
1 year
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity rating scale
Time Frame: 1 year
1-item questionnaire
1 year
Return to work
Time Frame: 1 year
Assessed by a short self-composed questionnaire, which evaluates what kind of work the patients do, when they started after surgery and whether this is the same as their preoperative job
1 year
Alignment
Time Frame: 1 year
A long-leg radiograph is performed 1 year after surgery to assess mechanical alignment of the prosthesis with consideration of femur and tibia
1 year
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)
Time Frame: 10 year
2-item questionnaire to screen for major depressive episodes
10 year
Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)
Time Frame: 10 year
Questionnaire to asses pain self efficacy
10 year
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: 10 year
Explores pain catastrophizing and its relation to pain behaviour
10 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 22, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 22, 2036

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Total Knee Arthroplasty (uncemented rotating platform ATTUNE)

3
Subscribe