Arm Motor Rehabilitation, Entertainment and Cognition System for the Elderly.BAC.U

January 30, 2020 updated by: Dr. Nam H. Kim, Bright Cloud International Corp

Arm Motor Rehabilitation, Entertainment and Cognition System for the Elderly (Usability Study)

This usability study is to test the basic functionality of the BrightArm Compact (BAC) system. The BAC is a motorized rehabilitation platform to offer gravity bearing for weak upper extremity. It has a medical grade PC which hosts numerous interactive, adaptable computer games, played using BrightBrainer Grasp (BBG) controllers. The device is passive, in that no actuators apply forces on the patient. Further, the patient is free to lift that arm, nothing restricts the arms movement away from the BAC table.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Healthy, age matched participants are invited to test the BAC at Bright Cloud Int Corporate Labs (675 US Hwy 1 south, B203, North Brunswick, NJ 08902, USA).

At the beginning of the usability training, participants will be required to sign a consent form, and BCI research staff will go over the details of the study and check inclusion criteria (generally healthy individual, age 50 ~ 85, English speaker, cognitively normal).

Subjects participate in 4 study sessions over approximately 1 month, each session lasting about an hour. The BAC table will have a different configuration each session. In the first session the table will have 0 tilt (flat). In session 2 it will be tilted 10 degrees downwards, in session 3 the table will be tilted up 10 degrees and in Session 4 the BAC table will be tilted up 20 degrees.

The difficulty of the games will also vary from session to session, progressing from the lowest difficulty in Session 1 to the highest difficulty in Session 4. Thus a given game will not be exactly the same, when played in a subsequent session, so to allow varying interaction scenarios.

At the end of each session, participants will be asked to fill up a custom feedback form. The custom form has questions on the system, the rehabilitation table, the controller, the therapeutic games they tested, and their overall impression of the experimental device. Each question on the custom form is answered on a 5-point Liker Scale.

At the end of the last session they will fill a standardized USE form, with questions rated on a 7-point Likert scale.

Feedback from participant will be used to improve the device as well as the therapeutic games.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • North Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08902
        • Commercialization Center for Innovative Technologies, Suite B203

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • generally healthy
  • age 50~80;
  • good or corrected vision;
  • good or corrected hearing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • motor or cognitively impaired;
  • outside 50~80 age bracket;
  • inability to speak English;
  • history of violence or drug abuse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Device Usability Study
Usability evaluators of medical device (Healthy volunteers).
participants interact with medical device and rate it for usability

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective evaluation of medical device (custom questionnaire)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Custom questionnaire rating on a 5 point Likert scale. 1 (min), 5 (max), larger number means better outcomes
4 weeks
USE Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 weeks
Participants fill the standardized USE questionnaire rating the BrightArm Compact system on a 7-point Likert Scale. 1 (min), 7 (max), larger number means better outcomes.
1 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Game errors
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participants play a number of custom, adaptable therapeutic games, and their errors are stored. Min number is 0, which is also the best outcome.
4 weeks
Game difficulty
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participants play a number of custom, adaptable therapeutic games, and their game difficulty level is stored each time. Min is 1, larger number is better
4 weeks
Game scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participants play a number of custom, adaptable therapeutic games, and their game scores are stored each time. Min score is 0, larger score is better.
4 weeks
Level of comfort
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participants play a number of custom, adaptable therapeutic games, at varying device configuration and report on perceived level of comfort (free form).
4 weeks
Device ruggedness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participants play a number of custom, adaptable therapeutic games, at varying device configuration and report on frequency of technical issues (free form).
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 15, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 28, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BCI-10-001.BAC.U
  • 5R44AG044639-05 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on usability evaluation of medical device

3
Subscribe