Expression of Markers Related to Mitochondrial Functionality in Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder: Comparative Retrospective Analysis Between Recurrent Tumors ("Non-responders") and Non-recurrent Tumors ("Responders") After Intravesical Treatment With Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy (MITOMARKER-MIM)

February 12, 2020 updated by: Michele Tedeschi, Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Retrospective monocentric study evaluating different immunohistochemical phenotypes related to mitochondrial functions with treatment outcomes

Study Overview

Detailed Description

About 80% of newly diagnosed patients have non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), including papillary lesions confined to the urothelium (stage Ta) or invading the lamina propria (stage T1), and carcinoma in situ (CIS). These tumors show low progression rates, but high recurrence. In particular, patients with multifocal high-grade urothelial carcinoma have a high risk of both recurrence (∼70% after 1 yr) and progression (5% after 1 yr). Initial NMIBC management is a transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), followed by adjuvant intravesical treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent Mitomycin C (MMC) or the immunotherapy Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). However, these therapies lead to variable clinical responses and patients recur shortly after surgery. Despite both therapies have been used for decades in the treatment of NMIBC, at the moment it is not possible to predict after initial staging which patients will benefit from them since neither resistance mechanisms nor genetic markers associated to relapse have been identified yet.

In a preliminary analysis, the invesitigators found that low expression of several proteins involved in mitochondrial functions correlate with a worst prognosis in bladder cancer patients. The aim of this study is to detect markers of mitochondrial dysfunction by immunohistochemistry in recurrent tumors ("non-responders") and non-recurrent tumors ("responders") after intravesical treatment with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, and determine the prognostic relevance of these different markers.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Milan
      • Rozzano, Milan, Italy, 20089
        • Recruiting
        • Humanitas reseach hospital (ICH)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with NMIBC at first diagnosis, pTa/pT1 (primary tumors) treated with MMC or BCG after TURBT will be selected from the institutional patient registry.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 years of age at diagnosis
  • Histologically confirmed NMIBC urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (pTa, pT1, CIS)
  • Primary NMIBC or not treated secondary NMIBC, after a primary non-invasive malignancy
  • Patients underwent TURBT for NMIBC at Humanitas between 2000 and 2019
  • Patients that received intravesical instillations with either MMC or BCG after TURBT at Humanitas between 2000 and 2019
  • Written informed consent to research purpose
  • For non-recurrent tumors ("responders"):

    • Patient treated with adjuvant MMC or BCG that did not experience recurrence for at least 42 months after TURBT
    • Patients are tumor-free at the moment of the analysis
  • For recurrent tumors ("non-responders"):

    • Patient treated with adjuvant MMC or BCG that experienced recurrence in the first 24 months after TURBT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous malignancies other that bladder cancer
  • Patients with a history of treated bladder cancer recurrences

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Responder patients

Patients with NMIBC at first diagnosis, pTa/pT1 (primary tumors) treated with MMC or BCG after TURBT will be selected from the institutional patient registry.

  • Patient treated with adjuvant MMC or BCG that did not experience recurrence for at least 42 months after TURBT
  • Patients are tumor-free at the moment of the analysis
evaluate an immunophenotypical profile related to mitochondrial functions in tumors responders vs non-responder to intravescical chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Verify the possible prognostic differences in clinical behavior between the two populations.
Non responder patients

Patients with NMIBC at first diagnosis, pTa/pT1 (primary tumors) treated with MMC or BCG after TURBT will be selected from the institutional patient registry.

o Patient treated with adjuvant MMC or BCG that experienced recurrence in the first 24 months after TURBT.

evaluate an immunophenotypical profile related to mitochondrial functions in tumors responders vs non-responder to intravescical chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Verify the possible prognostic differences in clinical behavior between the two populations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Immunohistochemestry analysis of biomarkers
Time Frame: 1 year
perform an immunophenotypical analysis to assess the expression of key proteins involved in mitochondrial functionality in recurrent tumors ("non-responders") and non-recurrent tumors ("responders") after intravesical treatment with chemotherapy or immunotherapy.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of biomarker expression with outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
• To correlate the resulting phenotype with clinical/pathological response to adjuvant treatments (time to recurrence and presence of recurrence).
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Research outcome

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

3
Subscribe