Health Beliefs, Glycemic Control, and Preventing Cognitive Decline in African Americans with Diabetes and Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Randomized Clinical Trial (DREAM)

November 18, 2024 updated by: Barry Rovner, Thomas Jefferson University
This double-masked, 2-year, single-site, phase II RCT will test the efficacy of DREAM (Diabetes Regulation for Eye Sight and Memory to prevent cognitive decline in African Americans (AAs) with amnestic multiple domain mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and poorly controlled diabetes (i.e., hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] level ≥ 7.5%). Participants will be randomized to DREAM [11 home-based treatment sessions with a community health worker (CHW), and 4 telehealth visits with a Diabetes Nurse Educator over 2 years] or Enhanced Usual Care (EUC), which is usual care enhanced with home-based diabetes education. The primary outcome is decline in verbal memory over 2 years. Follow-up data will be collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. In addition, participants will have ophthalmology assessments (at Wills) at baseline, 12 and 24 months to determine whether retinal Vessel Area Density, and/or Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer thickness mediate DREAM's treatment effect.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Thirty percent of African Americans (AAs) with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) have (DM), which increases risk for cognitive decline and dementia. Poorly controlled DM magnifies this risk, and AAs have worse glycemic control than Whites. This single-site, double-blind, active-control, phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare the efficacy of DM-Specific Behavioral Activation (DM-BA) vs. Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) to prevent decline in verbal memory (primary outcome) over 2 years in 200 AAs over age 65 years with amnestic multiple-domain MCI and poorly controlled DM. DM-BA is a behavioral treatment for DM, as well as a secondary prevention strategy for dementia. DM-BA reinforces DM self-care and addresses negative beliefs about medications and physicians. In DM-BA, race-concordant community health workers (CHWs) will: 1) deliver in-home DM education tailored to AAs with MCI; 2) use action plans to reinforce DM self-care; 3) facilitate telehealth visits with a DM nurse educator to guide management of DM and address participants' health beliefs; and 4) increase primary care physicians' (PCP) awareness of participants' cognitive deficits and health beliefs to optimize treatment of DM. The control treatment, EUC, is usual medical care enhanced with DM self-care education. Both DM-BA and EUC deliver DM education and have the same number of in-home treatment visits (i.e., 6 visits over 6 months, and 5 booster visits over the next 18 months). EUC, however, does not include DM-BA's behavioral approach to improve glycemic control, telehealth visits with a DM nurse educator, or PCP communication. The treatment comparison will identify DM-BA's specific efficacy over and above EUC. Randomization will follow a fixed scheme with a 1:1 allocation ratio and stratification by hemoglobin A1c level (7.5% - 9% vs. ≥ 9%). We are recruiting participants from primary care practices. We will administer the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) (to assess verbal memory; the primary outcome) and the Uniform Data Set neuropsychological battery (to assess executive function, processing speed, language, visuospatial function, and global cognition; all exploratory outcomes) at baseline and months 6, 12, 18, and 24. The primary efficacy analysis will compare trajectories in HVLT-R Total Recall scores over 2 years by treatment group. A novel exploratory aim will investigate whether Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) measures of retinal Vessel Area Density (an indicator of microvascular disease) and/or Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer thickness (an indicator of neurodegeneration) [i.e., proxies for cerebral microvascular and neurodegenerative disease, respectively] mediate treatment effects. We will also explore whether APOE genotype moderates treatment effects, and explore DM-BA's impact on multiple cognitive domains and incidence rates of dementia. We powered this RCT to test the hypothesis that the slope of the trajectory of HVLT-R Total Recall scores in DM-BA participants will not differ significantly from 0 (i.e., no change), whereas the slope of the trajectory of HVLT-R Total Recall scores in EUC controls will be significantly negative (i.e., decline) over 2 years. With 25% attrition over 2 years, a randomized sample of 200 participants will provide over 80% power for detecting an annual 1-point difference in slopes (2-point difference in 2-year means; a clinically meaningful difference) at the two-sided alpha=0.05 level. The scientific rigor of this study derives from the double-blind RCT design; recruitment of a sample at high risk for cognitive decline; use of validated outcome measures; adequate power; masked outcome assessments; delivery of two standardized credible interventions, and data already demonstrating DM-BA's effectiveness to improve glycemic control. This RCT is innovative because it will determine whether improving glycemic control prevents cognitive decline in a high risk population. Previous RCTs have studied lower risk populations and have been inconclusive. We will also uniquely explore whether OCT-evidence of retinal microvascular disease and/or neurodegeneration mediate treatment effects. This RCT is significant because it targets two prevalent problems in older AAs with DM (i.e., poor glycemic control and dementia). AAs' high risk for this comorbidity emerges in part from cultural factors (e.g., health beliefs) and requires culturally relevant treatment. The number of older AAs with DM in the U.S. (now 1 million) will double by 2030. This doubling will increase the burden of dementia in AAs (who already have twice the rate of dementia as Whites) and necessitates preventive treatment. We have the experience and expertise to test this treatment, and the opportunity to change how DM is treated to prevent cognitive decline in AAs with DM. If successful, this RCT will bring us closer to achieving health equity for all Americans and meet the goals of the National Alzheimer's Project Act.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

145

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • African American race
  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • Type 2 DM
  • Duration of DM ≥ 1 year
  • HbA1c ≥ 7.5
  • Amnestic multiple-domain MCI by NIA-AA criteria
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia
  • Excluded medical conditions
  • Life expectancy less than two years in the opinion of the PCP
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Cannot provide written consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diabetes Regulation for Eyesight and Memory (DREAM)
DREAM is a behavioral treatment for diabetes mellitus (DM), as well as a secondary prevention strategy for dementia. DREAM acts to reinforce DM self-care and address negative beliefs about medications and physicians, which compromise glycemic control in African Americans (AAs). In DREAM, race-concordant community health workers (CHWs) will: 1) deliver in-home DM education tailored to AAs with MCI; 2) use action plans to reinforce diabetes self-care; 3) facilitate telehealth visits with a DM nurse educator to improve DM self-care and address participants' health beliefs; and 4) increase primary care physicians' (PCP) awareness of participants' cognitive deficits and health beliefs to optimize treatment of DM. .
Participants randomized to DREAM will have 11 in-home visits over 2 years with a CHW, and 4 telehealth visits with a DM nurse educator.
Other Names:
  • DREAM
Active Comparator: Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)
EUC consists of home visits by a CHW in which general DM education is provided.
Participants in this group will have 11 in-home CHW visits over 24 months to control for attention. During these visits, the CHW will provide general diabetes education. There will be no telehealth visits.
Other Names:
  • EUC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decline in Verbal Memory
Time Frame: 24 months
Scores on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test total recall (HVLT)
24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycemic Control
Time Frame: 24 months
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
24 months
Retinal Vessel Area Density Layer thickness mediates treatment effects;
Time Frame: 24 months
Retinal Vessel Area Density
24 months
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Layer thickness mediates treatment effects;
Time Frame: 24 months
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness
24 months
Dementia
Time Frame: 24 months
Incidence of dementia based on an adjudication panel
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Barry Rovner, MD, Thomas Jefferson University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Regulation for Eyesight and Memory

Subscribe