Trauma Focus Model for Reducing Long-Term Foster Care

March 22, 2019 updated by: Westat

Permanency Innovations Initiative- Trauma Focus Model for Reducing Long-Term Foster Care Project

The Trauma Focus Model for Reducing Long-Term Foster Care Project with the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) is implementing a trauma-focused intervention, Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET) to increase permanency rates for a target population of children identified as being most at risk of long-term foster care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) is one of six recipients of the Permanency Innovations Initiative Grant. These funds support the statewide implementation of Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET) in Illinois. TARGET is a manualized, psycho-educational intervention designed to address complex trauma and difficulties with emotional regulation and relational engagement that occur across a wide range of trauma-related difficulties, including trauma-related and behavioral symptoms. The aim of this intervention is to address the key barriers to permanence for the target population. This population includes youth ages 11-16 who are placed in traditional, relative, and specialized foster homes throughout the state of Illinois, have been in foster care for at least 2 years, and are experiencing mental health challenges and/or at least one placement change. The three key barriers to permanency are: (1) children's need to improve emotional regulation and reduce symptom severity, particularly disruptive behaviors; (2) biological parents' skills in regulating their emotions so they are better able to complete services and address the underlying issues related to their involvement in the child welfare system; (3) foster parents and other placement resources skills in understanding and addressing the needs and disruptive behaviors of the children in their care with trauma histories.

The local evaluation will examine the effectiveness of the TARGET program in increasing permanency rates for foster youth in the target population. The main hypothesis to be tested is that addressing unstable child affect & behavior secondary to trauma using an intervention that improves both youth modulation skills as well as foster parent capacity to respond appropriately to youth will stabilize placements and improve youth ability to engage with potential permanency resources, thus facilitating progress toward permanence. The evaluation involves randomly assigning eligible foster youth to receive TARGET services or receive services as usual. The evaluators collect proximal and distal outcomes from multiple administrative data sources. Additionally, the evaluation includes the collection of key proximal outcomes through the use of interviews with foster youth, their foster parents and biological parents deemed eligible for participation in the project.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

462

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Youth ages 11-16 who are placed in traditional, relative, and specialized foster homes throughout the state of Illinois who, upon reaching the two-year anniversary of entering care, are experiencing mental health symptoms and/or have had at least one placement change.
  • If a youth does not exhibit any mental health symptoms as indicated by the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength (CANS) tool, they need to have at least 3 placement changes to be eligible for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Youth are ineligible to participate if at the time of eligibility assessment, they are in need of immediate and acute substance abuse treatment, have a Full Scale IQ score below 70, and/or have made recent suicidal threats or plans.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
The intervention is called the Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET). TARGET is a manualized, psycho-educational intervention delivered in 10 - 12 sessions. TARGET is designed to address complex trauma and difficulties with emotional regulation and relational engagement that occur across a wide range of trauma-related difficulties, including trauma-related and behavioral symptoms. The full TARGET model consists of learning 7 essential core skills. These skills are called the FREEDOM steps: Focus, Recognize triggers, Emotion self-check, Evaluate thoughts, Define goals, Options, and Make a contribution.
Other Names:
  • TARGET
No Intervention: Comparison

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to stable permanence
Time Frame: Measured from the date of random assignment to the discharge date or to the end of the study period for cases that did not discharge
Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS)
Measured from the date of random assignment to the discharge date or to the end of the study period for cases that did not discharge
Placement stability
Time Frame: Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study
Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS)
Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Foster parent skills in responding to youth's emotional and behavioral dysregulation
Time Frame: completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Measured by Parenting Practices Chicago Survey (PPCS) (Gorman-Smith et al., 1996)
completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biological parent ability to regulate their own emotions and behaviors and experience of trauma-related symptoms
Time Frame: completed by biological parents of study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Measured by Abbreviated Dysregulation Inventory (ADI) (Mezzich et al., 2001)
completed by biological parents of study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Biological parent service completion
Time Frame: Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study
Measured by administrative data from the Administrative Case Review (ACR)
Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study
Biological parent contact with youth
Time Frame: completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Measured by Parent Contact with Youth (PCY) Instrument (questions modified from the Illinois Adult Connections Study)
completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Change in Youth trauma-related and mental health symptoms
Time Frame: 1) Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study and 2) completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Measured by: 1) administrative data from the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength (CANS) tool and 2) the Trauma Symptoms Checklist for Children (TSCC) (Briere, 1996)
1) Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study and 2) completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Youth capacity to form and maintain relationships.
Time Frame: Measured 1) at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study and 2) completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Measured by: 1) administrative data from the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength (CANS) tool and 2) Youth Social Support Instrument (YSS) (LONGSCAN, 1998)
Measured 1) at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study and 2) completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Youth capacity to regulate their emotions and behavior
Time Frame: Measured 1) at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study and 2) completed by both study youth and their current caregiver at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Measured by: 1) administrative data from the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength (CANS) tool and 2) the Abbreviated Dysregulation Inventory (ADI) (Mezzich et al., 2001)
Measured 1) at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study and 2) completed by both study youth and their current caregiver at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Change in support for biological and foster parents
Time Frame: Measured at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Measured by Social Provisions Scale (SPS) (Russell & Cutrona, 1984) completed by both biological and foster parents of study youth
Measured at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Change in Youth traumatic events
Time Frame: Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study
Measured by administrative data from the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength (CANS) tool
Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study
Youth emotional permanency
Time Frame: Measured at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Measured by Youth Emotional Permanency (YEP) Instrument (questions from the current Illinois Adult Connections Study and the Supportive Connections Inventory developed for the Arizona PII evaluation) completed by youth
Measured at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection
Frequencies of change in direction of youth permanency
Time Frame: collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Measured by administrative data from the Integrated Database (IDB)
collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Permanency rates
Time Frame: collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) collected every 6 months throughout the study duration.
collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Timely permanence
Time Frame: collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS)
collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Placement stability after legal permanency
Time Frame: collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS)
collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Repeat maltreatment following legal permanence
Time Frame: collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS)
collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 8977 3

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Foster Care

Clinical Trials on Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET)

3
Subscribe