Cognitive Training for Diabetes Self-Management

November 25, 2024 updated by: University of Texas at Austin
The overall objective of this study is to determine the effects of a comprehensive cognitive rehabilitation intervention on biological, cognitive, and diabetes self-management outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Test the efficacy of the MAPSS-DM intervention for improving cognitive function, A1C, and DM-SM. Based on preliminary data, the working hypothesis is that compared with the control group, persons who receive the intervention will have improved memory, executive function, and perceived cognitive function, greater use of cognitive strategies, and improved DM-SM immediately post-intervention and at three and six-months post-intervention.

Aim 2: To explore changes in glycemic variability and their association with changes in cognitive function. The working hypothesis here is that MAPSS-DM participants will exhibit less glycemic variability post-intervention as compared with baseline and glycemic variability will mediate improvements in cognitive test performance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
        • The University of Texas at Austin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 50 years old or greater
  • T2DM diagnosis for 2 years
  • access to phone and Internet
  • Score of ≥10 on the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ)
  • A1C of >7%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a diagnosis of dementia/head injury
  • score of >5 on the Mini-Cog
  • inability to speak English, and T1DM diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Memory, Attention, and Problem Solving Skills for Diabetes
The intervention is composed of 4 small-group webinar classes and home-based individual online cognitive skills practice over 8 weeks. Classes 1 & 2 will focus on common cognitive problems in T2DM and strategies to improve cognitive skills. Classes 3 & 4 focus on lifestyle changes to support cognitive functioning and DM-SM skills. The computer-training component uses a model for cognitive training that adapts to the user through an integrated hierarchical structure. The BrainHQ website houses the interactive program that runs on standard web browsers. Each participant will be registered by the project staff using anonymous ID numbers that will allow unlimited access during the study. The website stores each session completed, and participants can start subsequent sessions wherever they stopped the last time logged on. The intervention group will be asked to practice 20 minutes, 7 days a week.
The intervention is composed of 4 small-group webinar classes and home-based individual online cognitive skills practice and will be held over 8 weeks. The classes will be taught by a GRA. Classes 1 & 2 will focus on common cognitive problems in T2DM and strategies to improve cognitive skills. Classes 3 & 4 focus on lifestyle changes to support cognitive functioning and DM-SM skills. Each online class will follow the same format: (1) introduction/revisiting content from the previous class; (2) review of progress on computer exercises; (3) practicing cognitive strategies in class; and (4) a weekly topic. The GRA will also prescribe exercises for the following weeks.
Active Comparator: Brain Games Only
An active control group will be used. The differing variable between the two groups is the class sessions. Those randomized to the control group will only receive a link to the BrainHQ games site. A specific amount of practice will not be prescribed, but the frequency and duration of participant's practice will be obtained from BrainHQ. Participants will receive a weekly phone call to maintain connection to the study. Data collection will be on the same schedule as the intervention group.
The computer-training component uses a model for cognitive training that adapts to the user through an integrated hierarchical structure. The BrainHQ website houses the interactive program that runs on standard web browsers. Participants will only need a computer, smart phone, or tablet with Internet access to securely log onto the website. Each participant will be registered by the project staff using anonymous ID numbers that will allow unlimited access during the study. The website stores each session completed, and participants can start subsequent sessions wherever they stopped the last time logged on.
Other Names:
  • BrainHQ

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in A1C at Week 22
Time Frame: Baseline and week 22
Measure of difference in average glucose over 22 weeks; A1C is one time point that measures a 3 month average glucose (e.g. and A1C of 7% = approximately a 154mg/dl average glucose for the past 3 months) therefore it can be measured at baseline and week 22 and still reflect a 3 month average at both those time points.
Baseline and week 22
Change in Diabetes Self-management Adherence at Week 22
Time Frame: Baseline and week 22
Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities: 8 items; Brief assessment of diabetes related psychosocial self-efficacy. Responses are made on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) to items such as "I believe that I am able to turn my diabetes goals into a workable plan." Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-management adherence.
Baseline and week 22
Change in Glucose Variability at Week 22
Time Frame: Baseline and week 22
Difference in the standard deviation of glucose readings from baseline and week 22
Baseline and week 22
Change From Baseline to Week 22 in the Number of Correct Responses in 90 Seconds on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test
Time Frame: Baseline and week 22
Symbol Digit Modalities Test: Participants are given a series of symbols and digits and instructed to verbalize the digit associated with each symbol. The number of correct responses in 90 sec constitutes the score, and higher scores reflect better cognitive function.
Baseline and week 22

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Perceived Cognitive Function at Week 22
Time Frame: Baseline and week 22
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v2.0 - Cognitive Function: 32 items; assess patient-perceived cognitive deficits including the areas of mental acuity, concentration, verbal and nonverbal memory, and verbal fluency. Items include questions such as, "In the past 7 days, my thinking has been slow" and "In the past 7 days I have had trouble concentrating." Items are ranked on a 1 to 5 scale (5 = very often/several times a day to 1 = never). Scores range from 32 to 160. Higher scores indicate more perceived difficulty with cognitive function.
Baseline and week 22

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heather E Cuevas, PhD, The University of Texas at Austin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00000464
  • R21NR019266 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only de-identified quantitative and qualitative data will be available to other qualified researchers upon request from the PI two years after completion of the study. After review of the purpose of the data request to make sure it is consistent with the original project goals and verification that the request meets IRB approval, de-identified data may be shared with researchers two years after completion of the study. It is recognized that the government reserves the right to identify repositories for submission of data for archive as stated in the grant instructions.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Memory, Attention, and Problem Solving Skills for Diabetes

Subscribe