Dartmouth Middle Meningeal Embolization Trial (DaMMET) (DAMMET)

February 20, 2024 updated by: Clifford J. Eskey, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

A Single Center Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematomas

Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) are one form of bleeding in the head. They are one of the most common diseases encountered by neurosurgeons across the country. The cSDH can push on the brain and produce symptoms that include seizures, weakness, loss of sensation, and confusion. Many of these cSDH produce repetitive bleeding.

Treatment has largely consisted of surgical drainage of hematoma (also known as a blood clot) through either a small hole in the skull or open surgery. However, it is common for the cSDH to reappear despite these procedures. A recent study has shown a treatment failure rate of 27% and a need for additional surgery at 19%.

A new approach to treatment of cSDH blocks the blood supply to the tissue that produces the repeated bleeding. Catheters are used to gain access to the middle meningeal artery (MMA), an artery that supplies the coverings of the brain. The artery is blocked using small particles or glue in a process called embolization. A recent pilot study of 72 patients who underwent MMA embolization showed a much lower rate of repeated bleeding. Based on these results, it is thought that this procedure holds promise in reducing the number of cSDH that require one or more operations. The goal of this study is to systematically examine if blocking the blood supply to the tissue responsible for repeated bleeding helps the cSDH resolve and improves patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Have radiographic imaging showing a cSDH > 7mm in maximal thickness encompassing > 50% of the convexity (non-focal).
  • Capable of giving consent for the procedure or have an acceptable surrogate capable of giving consent on the subject's behalf

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The cSDH is secondary to an underlying vascular malformation, tumor, cyst, spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid hypotension or previous craniotomy
  • Life expectancy < 6 months
  • Vascular anatomy that puts the patient at high risk for adverse events (e.g. critical carotid stenosis, abnormal external-internal carotid circulation)
  • Incapable of being reasonably expected to be able to attend follow-up appointments at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • Vulnerable patients including homeless patients, incarcerated patients and mentally ill patients without appropriate medical decision-making proxy that the physician believes are incapable of appropriately assessing the risks of the procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Symptomatic, standard of care
Patients in this group will be offered all procedures and care deemed appropriate by the Neurosurgeon in charge of their care. This could include surgical intervention, observation, medical management.
Standard of care could include observation or intervention including surgical drainage of subdural hematoma by bedside drain, Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS), burr hole or craniotomy
Experimental: Symptomatic, MMA embolization + standard of care
Patients in this group will be treated with the standard of care treatment (the same care described in the arm "Symptomatic, standard of care") but will also undergo MMA embolization of the affected side(s).
Standard of care could include observation or intervention including surgical drainage of subdural hematoma by bedside drain, Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS), burr hole or craniotomy
Using established endovascular techniques and materials patient will have a diagnostic catheter based angiogram performed on the side(s) of the brain where the subdural hematoma is present. After verifying the vascular anatomy to ensure safety of the procedure the Middle Meningeal Artery will be embolized.
Active Comparator: Asymptomatic, standard of care
Patients in this group will be offered all procedures deemed appropriate by the Neurosurgeon in charge of their care. This could include surgical intervention, observation, medical management.
Standard of care could include observation or intervention including surgical drainage of subdural hematoma by bedside drain, Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS), burr hole or craniotomy
Experimental: Asymptomatic, standard of care + MMA embolization
Patients in this group will be treated with the standard of care treatment (the same care described in the arm "Asymptomatic, standard of care") but will also undergo MMA embolization of the affected side(s).
Standard of care could include observation or intervention including surgical drainage of subdural hematoma by bedside drain, Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS), burr hole or craniotomy
Using established endovascular techniques and materials patient will have a diagnostic catheter based angiogram performed on the side(s) of the brain where the subdural hematoma is present. After verifying the vascular anatomy to ensure safety of the procedure the Middle Meningeal Artery will be embolized.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic resolution of hematoma
Time Frame: 3 months post-procedure
CT scan to evaluate for residual hematoma, comparing baseline to 3 months
3 months post-procedure
Radiographic resolution of hematoma
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
CT scan to evaluate for residual hematoma, comparing baseline to 6 months. Can be canceled if cSDH is completely resolved at 3 months
6 months post-procedure
Radiographic resolution of hematoma
Time Frame: 12 months post-procedure
CT scan to evaluate for residual hematoma, comparing baseline to 12 months. Can be canceled if cSDH is completely resolved at 3 or 6 months
12 months post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptomatic improvement
Time Frame: 3 month follow up appointment
HPI and neurologic exam (standard clinic follow-up) to compare to presenting symptoms.
3 month follow up appointment
Symptomatic improvement
Time Frame: 6 month follow up appointment
HPI and neurologic exam (standard clinic follow-up) to compare to presenting symptoms. This may be canceled if the symptoms and hematoma are completely resolved at 3 months
6 month follow up appointment
Symptomatic improvement
Time Frame: 12 month follow up appointment
HPI and neurologic exam (standard clinic follow-up) to compare to presenting symptoms. This may be canceled if the symptoms and hematoma are completely resolved at 3 or 6 months
12 month follow up appointment
NIH Stroke Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparison of NIHSS at admission to 3 month follow-up
3 months
NIH Stroke Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of NIHSS at admission to 6 month follow-up. May be canceled if cSDH resolved by 3 month follow up
6 months
NIH Stroke Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of NIHSS at admission to 12 month follow-up. May be canceled if cSDH resolved by 3 or 6 month follow up
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There are no plans to share IPD at this time.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Clinical Trials on Standard of care including possible surgical evacuation of subdural hematoma

3
Subscribe