Surgical Assessment Tool for Ethiopia National Policy Monitoring & Evaluation

February 17, 2020 updated by: John Meara, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Development of a Surgical Assessment Tool for National Policy Monitoring & Evaluation in Ethiopia: A Quality Improvement Study

Introduction: A baseline assessment of surgical capacity is recommended as a first-step to inform national policy on surgical system strengthening. In Ethiopia, the World Health Organization's Situational Analysis Tool (WHO SAT) was adapted to assess surgical capacity as part of a national initiative: Saving Lives Through Safe Surgery (SaLTS). This study describes the process of adapting this tool and initial results.

Methods: The new tool was used to evaluate fourteen hospitals in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People's Region of Ethiopia between February and March 2017. Two analytic methods were employed. To compare this data to international metrics, the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) framework was used. To assess congruence with national policy, data was evaluated against Ethiopian SaLTS targets.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples' (SNNP) Region is one of Ethiopia's eleven regions, occupying the southwest portion of the country. Public hospitals serve the region's population in this area within three tiers - primary, general, and specialized hospitals. An average of four providers were interviewed per facility and participants included hospital leadership (CEOs, medical directors, and matrons), surgeons, integrated emergency surgical officers, obstetrician-gynecologists, mid-level anesthesia providers, and operating room nurses.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fourteen public hospitals (11 primary, 1 general, and 2 specialized) chosen by the regional health bureau
  • Hospital staff with willingness to participate in study
  • Hospital staff with availability to participate in study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospital staff which did not volunteer to participate or refused to participate were excluded.
  • Hospital staff not available at the time of visit
  • Hospitals not chosen by the regional health bureau

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Ecologic or Community
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General service readiness
Time Frame: Cross-Sectional, assesses availability of this infrastructure within the past year in general
Measured by the number of hospital beds, major operating rooms, surgical/anesthesia/and obstetric providers, and basic infrastructure availability
Cross-Sectional, assesses availability of this infrastructure within the past year in general
Basic surgery readiness
Time Frame: Cross-Sectional, assesses availability of tracer items within the past year in general
Readiness for surgical services was assessed based on the presence of tracer items identified by WHO/USAID Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) as particularly important for providing basic surgical services. The service specific readiness score is defined as the mean availability of service specific tracer items in three domains (staff and training, equipment, and medicines and commodities).
Cross-Sectional, assesses availability of tracer items within the past year in general
Comprehensive surgery readiness
Time Frame: Cross-Sectional, assesses availability of tracer items within the past year in general
Readiness for surgical services was assessed based on the presence of additional tracer items identified by WHO/USAID Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) as necessary to provide comprehensive surgical services, beyond those needed for basic surgery.
Cross-Sectional, assesses availability of tracer items within the past year in general

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John G Meara, MD, DMD, MBA, Harvard Medical School & Boston Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IJS-D-19-00363R1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Raw data from the survey is available in the study and appendices planned for publication. Additionally, the original source data without identification of the specific hospitals, is available upon request with author consensus.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Once the original study is published, de-identified results will be available by request to the authors.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Original data may be provided upon request to the authors with consensus approval from all co-authors.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Public Health

3
Subscribe