- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04280562
Remote Participation (Within USA) Trial of Sana Pain Reliever
October 13, 2025 updated by: David Putrino, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Extended Home-use Trial of a Novel Device to Reduce Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and patient perception of the benefit of the Sana Pain Reliever in individuals with chronic neuropathic pain.The study is fully remote with four study visits taking place over teleconferencing and the study devices mailed to the participants to use at home for 8-14 weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Chronic neuropathic pain (NP) is an extremely debilitating condition with few treatment options and many of which with multiple side effects.
This will be a randomized, sham-controlled trial that will investigate the effectiveness of a novel wearable device called the Sana Pain Reliever (Sana PR) at reducing chronic neuropathic pain.
The Sana PR is a device comprised of a Mask to be worn over the eyes with a pair of ear buds to be worn in ears.
It displays light and sounds in a predetermined algorithm which runs for 16 minutes at a time.
The underlying mechanism of action for the Sana PR is Audio Visual Stimulation (AVS), a form of non-pharmacological intervention that induces a brain wave response called Frequency Following Response (FFR), which has been used for both performance enhancement and symptom management.
The device will be used with a compatible tablet application that will collect data from each session that the device is used.
This data will be collected through user inputs of responses to several questionnaires.
This will be an at-home trial and participants will be loaned the Sana Pain Reliever device and a tablet device to run the application for the duration of the study.
The trial will last a total of 14 weeks and will involve four study visits, either in-person at the Abilities Research Center at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, or remotely using a video call.
The trial includes two baseline sessions on weeks 0 and 2, 8 weeks of the at-home intervention, and post-intervention sessions at the end of weeks 10 and 14.
Participants will be instructed to use the device at the end of the day prior to going to sleep as well as whenever they experience greater than typical pain during the day .
Data during the at home portion of the trial will be recorded daily via the application.
The application will also prompt participants to answer fortnightly weekly questionnaires and send out compliance reminders.
Additionally, a series of pain, sleep and quality of life assessments will be completed by participants at both baseline visits, a post-intervention visit and a 4-week follow-up visit.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
75
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10011
- ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed clinical diagnosis of neuropathic pain
- Age of 18 years or older at time of consent
- Fluent in English
- Consistent medications for the last 4 weeks prior to the first baseline visit (week 0)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of photosensitive epilepsy
- Active ear or eye infection
- Vision impairments that affect perception of light in one or both eyes
- Deafness in one or both ears
- Severe depression (Score higher than 30 points on the Beck's Depression Inventory)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: "Real" SPR
Participants will receive the device which will run the "real" Sana Pain Reliever (SPR) protocol and a tablet with a mobile application to record pain levels and other questionnaires
|
Participants will receive the SPR device and a tablet with instructions of how to use the device and how to answer the questionnaires on the tablet mobile application.
Each session with the device will last 16 minutes and run under the device's normal settings.
The session consists of periods of light and sounds (beeps).
Participants will be instructed to use the device each day at the end of the day prior to going to sleep and whenever they experience heightened pain during the day.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham SPR
Participants will receive the device which will run a sham SPR protocol and a tablet with a mobile application to record pain levels and other questionnaires
|
Participants will receive the SPR device and a tablet with instructions of how to use the device and how to answer the questionnaires on the tablet mobile application.
Each session with the device will last 16 minutes and run under the device's sham settings.
The session consists of periods of light and sounds (beeps).
Participants will be instructed to use the device each day at the end of the day prior to going to sleep and whenever they experience heightened pain during the day.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
This scale was developed to assess both the quantitative and qualitative qualities of neuropathic pain (NP).
It includes 12 items, assessing spontaneous pain, brief attacks of pain, provoked pain and abnormal sensations in the painful area.
This is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in neuropathic pain after a therapeutic intervention.
Full scale from 0-100 with higher score indicating more symptom intensity.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscale 1: Burning Pain
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
This scale was developed to assess both the quantitative and qualitative qualities of neuropathic pain (NP).
This is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in neuropathic pain after a therapeutic intervention.
Full subscale from 0-100 with higher score indicating more symptom intensity.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscale 2: Pressing Pain
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
This scale was developed to assess both the quantitative and qualitative qualities of neuropathic pain (NP).This is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in neuropathic pain after a therapeutic intervention.
Full subscale from 0-100 with higher score indicating more symptom intensity.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscale 3: Paroxysmal Pain
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
This scale was developed to assess both the quantitative and qualitative qualities of neuropathic pain (NP).
This is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in neuropathic pain after a therapeutic intervention.
Full subscale from 0-100 with higher score indicating more symptom intensity.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscale 4: Evoked Pain
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
This scale was developed to assess both the quantitative and qualitative qualities of neuropathic pain (NP).
This is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in neuropathic pain after a therapeutic intervention.
Full subscale from 0-100 with higher score indicating more symptom intensity.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscale 5: Paresthesia or Dysesthesia
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
This scale was developed to assess both the quantitative and qualitative qualities of neuropathic pain (NP).
It includes 12 items, assessing spontaneous pain, brief attacks of pain, provoked pain and abnormal sensations in the painful area.
This is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in neuropathic pain after a therapeutic intervention.
Subscale from 0-100.
Full scale from 0-100 with higher score indicating more symptom intensity.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is an effective instrument used to measure the quality and patterns of sleep in adults.
It differentiates "poor" from "good" sleep quality by measuring seven areas (components): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications, and daytime dysfunction over the last month.
Full score from 0-21, with higher score indicating worse sleep quality.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is used to evaluate depression symptoms, which are estimated to be highly prevalent in chronic pain populations.
This questionnaire is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression.
Depression may be a major contributor to a lack of reduction of pain.
Scoring is from 0 (minimal) to 3 (severe), with total score from 0-63.
Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
The Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) will be used to assess self-reported relieving effect.
It will evaluate pain from no change (score 0-1), minimally improved (score 2-3), much improved (score 4-5), and very much improved (score 6-7).
The patients will answer the following question: "Since beginning treatment at this program, how would you describe the change (if any) in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life related to your condition?".
Full score from 0-7, with higher score indicating more improvement.
Change in score at Week 14 as compared to Week 10.
|
Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire Type 9 for Depression (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
The Questionnaire Type 9 for Depression (PHQ-9) is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders.
The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the nine DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day).
It has been validated for use in primary care and is used to monitor the severity of depression and response to treatment.
Full scale from 0-27, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in General Anxiety Disorder 7-item Questionnaire (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
The General Anxiety Disorder 7-item questionnaire (GAD-7) is a 7-item questionnaire that asks user to rank how often they have been bothered by seven problems over the past two weeks from "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day).
The items that users are asked to rank levels of nervousness, anxiousness, relaxing, restlessness, irritability and fearfulness.
Full scale from 0-21, with higher score indicating more symptoms.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in World Health Organization Quality of Life Pain (WHOQOL-pain) - Pain Facet
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
The WHOQOL-pain scale is for a specific focus on the impact of pain on QOL.
The WHOQOL-pain has 22 items on the pain and discomfort module (PDM) and the importance of items within a user's daily life.
The Pain facet has 4 items (1-5) which are averaged to produce the WHOQOL-Pain Pain Facet.
Full scale from 1-5 with higher score indicating higher quality of life.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Change in World Health Organization Quality of Life Bref (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
The WHOQOL-BREF is a used to produce a quality of life profile for an individual that is derived from four domains.
There are 26 questions which ask users to respond to quality of life (QOL) questions on a scale of 1-5 (1-Not at All, Very Poor, or Very Dissatisfied; 5- Completely, Very Good, or Very Satisfied).
The QOL domain assess quality of life and has a score from 1-100.
Full scale from 0-100 with higher score indicating higher quality of life.
Change in score at Week 2, Week 10 and Week 14 as compared to Baseline.
|
Baseline 1(Week0); Baseline 2 (Week 2); Post-assessment (Week 10); Follow up (Week 14)
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-Pain
Time Frame: before and after each time device used up to 14 weeks
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to measure pain: a measure of "no pain" to "Worst pain imaginable" along a line.
Participants will be asked to mark the level of their pain along the line.
Full scale from 0-100 with higher score indicating more pain.
|
before and after each time device used up to 14 weeks
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-Sleep
Time Frame: first 3 days and 14 weeks
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to measure sleep: a measure of "did not sleep at all" to "best possible night's sleep" along a line.
Participants will be asked to mark the level of their sleep along the line.
The Sana Health application will prompt users to answer this scale before they use the device for the first time each day.
A linear mixed model used the daily sleep-vas scores to estimate the percent of change for both arms over the course of the study (Baseline to Week-14).
Percent change from mean of first 3 days.
1% to 100% with higher score indicating improved sleep quality.
|
first 3 days and 14 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Putrino, PT, PhD, ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 31, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 21, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
February 21, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 20, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
February 21, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 4, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 13, 2025
Last Verified
July 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- Perceptual Disorders
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Pain
- Chronic Pain
- Neuralgia
- Agnosia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Antipyretics
- Acetaminophen
- Analgesics
Other Study ID Numbers
- GCO 18-2282
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
Clinical Trials on Sana Pain Reliever
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiSana Health, Inc.RecruitingChronic Pain | Post-treatment Lyme Disease SyndromeUnited States
-
Sana HealthUniversity of PennsylvaniaWithdrawnQuality of Life | Fibromyalgia | Pain, Chronic
-
Stanford UniversityPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; San Mateo Medical CenterActive, not recruiting
-
ThuasneUniversity Hospital of Saint-Etienne; Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie...Completed
-
Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement...Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesRecruitingAdjustment DisordersUnited States
-
ThuasneCompletedOsteoarthritis, KneeFrance
-
Palo Alto Medical FoundationUniversity of Pittsburgh; University of Illinois at Chicago; RTI International; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and other collaboratorsCompletedInsulin Resistance | Prediabetic State | Metabolic Syndrome X
-
University of California, DavisCompleted
-
Sana HealthRalph H. Johnson VA Medical CenterCompletedPost Traumatic Stress DisorderUnited States
-
Sana HealthDuke UniversityCompleted