Symptomatic Trial of Angina Assessment Prior to Revascularization (ORBITA-STAR)

September 21, 2023 updated by: Imperial College London

Symptomatic Trial of Angina Assessment Prior to Revascularization: A Placebo-controlled Experiment on Symptoms in Stable Coronary Artery Disease

The principal objective of this research is to determine whether symptoms, induced by confirmed experimental ischaemia, can help us predict which patients will respond to PCI.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, W12 0HS
        • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
    • Essex
      • Basildon, Essex, United Kingdom
        • Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with single-vessel coronary artery disease with symptoms of stable angina

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Angina or angina-equivalent symptoms
  2. Anatomical evidence of a significant single vessel coronary stenosis on diagnostic coronary angiography indicating ≥ 70% stenosis
  3. Referred for percutaneous coronary intervention for treatment of stable angina

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age younger than 18
  2. Age older than 85
  3. Recent acute coronary syndrome
  4. Multivessel coronary artery disease
  5. Previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  6. Significant left main stem coronary disease
  7. Chronic total occlusion in the target vessel
  8. Contraindication to percutaneous coronary intervention or drug-eluting stent implantation
  9. Contraindication to antiplatelet therapy
  10. Contraindication to adenosine infusion
  11. Severe valvular disease
  12. Severe LV systolic impairment
  13. Severe respiratory disease
  14. Life expectancy less than 2 years, pregnancy, unable to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Placebo controlled similarity score during low pressure balloon occlusion of the coronary artery
Time Frame: 30 Days
Similarity Score (1-10) (Higher Score = Better Outcome)
30 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in angina symptom score
Time Frame: 30 Days
Fractional Change in Angina Frequency (0-1) (Lower Score = Better Outcome)
30 Days
Change in treadmill exercise time
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
Change in treadmill time to chest pain
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
Angina severity as assessed by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class
Time Frame: 30 Days
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class (0-IV) (Lower Score = Better Outcome)
30 Days
Physical limitation, angina stability, quality of life, angina frequency, freedom from angina as assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 30 Days
Seattle Angina Questionnaire, (Lower Score = Better Outcome)
30 Days
Quality of Life assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 Days
(Lower Score = Better Outcome)
30 Days
Change in dobutamine stress echocardiography score
Time Frame: 30 Days
(Lower Score = Better Outcome)
30 Days
Need for anti-anginal medication introduction and uptitration
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
Anxiety as assessed by the GAD-7 Score
Time Frame: 30 days
Generalised anxiety and depression - 7 Score. (Lower Score = Better Outcome)
30 days
Depression as assessed by the PHQ-9 Score
Time Frame: 30 days
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9. (Lower Score = Better Outcome)
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 16, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous coronary intervention

3
Subscribe