Chronobiological and ACT-based Training to Handle Stress at Work

February 26, 2020 updated by: Carolin Reichert, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel

Chronobiological and Acceptance and Commitment Based Training for the Successful Handling of Stress in the Workplace. A Randomised Crossover Clinical Study

The aim of the present project is to combine "Acceptance and Commitment Therapy" and "sleep hygiene + light-therapy (so-called chronotherapy)" serially in a sample of employees to reduce levels of subjective exhaustion.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • working in an office mainly (i.e., > 60% of work time)
  • Age: ≥18 years old
  • Sex: male and female individuals
  • Ownership of cell phone with internet connection
  • informed consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diseases of the retina or related diseases such as diabetes mellitus
  • taking drugs which heighten photosensitivity
  • inability to understand and follow procedures in German

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ACT-Chrono
First Acceptance and Commitment (ACT) training, followed by chronobiological training
During the ACT-based intervention, participants will get 4 training sessions in groups, once a week for an hour. Additionally, participants will be asked to implement behavioural exercises such as mindfulness and value-based exercises into their daily schedule.
During the chronobiological intervention, participants will get 4 training sessions in groups, one hour per week. Additionally, they will use a daylight lamp at home, for 30 minutes per day after waking up.
Experimental: Chrono-ACT
First chronobiological training, followed by ACT training
During the ACT-based intervention, participants will get 4 training sessions in groups, once a week for an hour. Additionally, participants will be asked to implement behavioural exercises such as mindfulness and value-based exercises into their daily schedule.
During the chronobiological intervention, participants will get 4 training sessions in groups, one hour per week. Additionally, they will use a daylight lamp at home, for 30 minutes per day after waking up.
Other: Chrono
First no training, followed by chronobiological training
During the chronobiological intervention, participants will get 4 training sessions in groups, one hour per week. Additionally, they will use a daylight lamp at home, for 30 minutes per day after waking up.
Other: ACT
First no training, followed by ACT training
During the ACT-based intervention, participants will get 4 training sessions in groups, once a week for an hour. Additionally, participants will be asked to implement behavioural exercises such as mindfulness and value-based exercises into their daily schedule.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in subjective exhaustion measured by the German Version of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure
Time Frame: approx. every two weeks, and at follow up (i.e., approx. 5 weeks after last training session)

Overall mean score as well as three subscales of Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure ( P = physical fatigue; E= emotional exhaustion; and C= cognitive weariness, each ranging from 1-7).

Note: Higher scores indicate higher levels of exhaustion (overall as well as on each scale P, E and C)

approx. every two weeks, and at follow up (i.e., approx. 5 weeks after last training session)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Subjective well-being as assessed by General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)
Time Frame: approx. every two weeks, and at follow up (i.e., approx. 5 weeks after last training session)
Sum over twelve items, higher scores indicate worse psychological well-being
approx. every two weeks, and at follow up (i.e., approx. 5 weeks after last training session)
Change in subjective well-being as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D)
Time Frame: approx. every 4 weeks
Sum over each of the subscales assessing somatic, depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms. The subscale assessing panic symptoms, alcohol abuse and intake of medication will be categorically evaluated.
approx. every 4 weeks
Change in quality of circadian rhythm
Time Frame: Actimetric devices are worn during 2 x 28 days continuously. The outcome of actimetric data are aggregated per person and training episode
Actimetric devices are worn during 2 x 28 days continuously. These devices store the amount of activity in a resolution of 30 Hz 24/7. For data analyses, these activity data will be aggregated to three values (stability, variability and relative amplitude) per participant and training episode by non-parametric circadian rhythm analyses; higher values indicate higher stability, variability and amplitude
Actimetric devices are worn during 2 x 28 days continuously. The outcome of actimetric data are aggregated per person and training episode
Change in subjective and objective sleep quality: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: PSQI is collected approx. every four weeks and at follow up (i.e. approx 5 weeks after last training), the single question and actimetric data are measured daily
Subjectively assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, higher scores indicate worse subjective sleep quality), by a single question about sleep quality (higher scores indicate worse quality) and by actimetric analyses
PSQI is collected approx. every four weeks and at follow up (i.e. approx 5 weeks after last training), the single question and actimetric data are measured daily
Change in Subjective sleepiness in the morning
Time Frame: KSS is measured daily
Measured by Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), higher scores indicate higher sleepiness
KSS is measured daily
Change in daytime subjective sleepiness
Time Frame: ESS approx every four weeks
Measured by Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS): higher scores indicate higher sleepiness
ESS approx every four weeks
Change in Chronotype
Time Frame: approx. every 4 weeks and at follow up (i.e., approx. 5 weeks after last training session)
Measured by a short version of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, higher scores indicate a later chronotype
approx. every 4 weeks and at follow up (i.e., approx. 5 weeks after last training session)
Change in Burnout severity
Time Frame: every 4 weeks
Measured by Maslach Burnout Inventory using sumscores of the subscales emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal achievement. Higher scores indicate higher exhaustion, depersonalization and better personal achievement
every 4 weeks
Change in Absences
Time Frame: Assessed daily
Numbers of days absent if available from the employer
Assessed daily
Change in Implementation of treatment
Time Frame: approx. every two weeks, and at follow up (i.e., approx. 5 weeks after last training session)
Questions about frequency implementation of treatment in daily life
approx. every two weeks, and at follow up (i.e., approx. 5 weeks after last training session)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carolin Reichert, PhD, Centre for Chronobiology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-01318

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Acceptance and Commitment Training

3
Subscribe