Stand Out in Class: Reducing Sitting Time in the Classroom Environment (SOIC2)

March 3, 2020 updated by: Stacy Clemes, Loughborough University
The primary aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of incorporating manually adjustable sit-stand desks in the classroom environment of 9-10 year olds in reducing sedentary behaviour at school during a full school year. Secondary aims include evaluating the effects of the intervention on health and learning outcomes as well as comparing the impact of full classroom allocation of sit-stand desks to a classroom of partial sit-stand desk allocation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rates of overweight and obesity and related chronic disease risk factors in children have increased worldwide over the past decades. Whilst it is widely acknowledged that regular physical activity provides health benefits, prolonged sedentary behaviour (sitting or reclining) has been shown to adversely affect children's health, independent of the child's physical activity levels. Adverse associations between sedentary behaviour and risk factors for disease, such as obesity, blood pressure, and high levels of cholesterol have been observed in children. In addition, prolonged sedentary behaviour has been linked to reduced cognitive development and academic achievement in children.

Changes in our environment and lifestyle have resulted in children not only becoming less physically active, but also spending unnecessarily long periods of time sitting, particularly in the classroom. Sedentary behaviour is the most prevalent behaviour exhibited by children in developed countries, comprising >65% of waking hours. The impact of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours, such as prolonged sitting, on children's health and development is concerning given the importance of childhood for the establishment of lifestyle behaviours that can track into adulthood.

The long term vision of our research is to re-address the balance between sedentary and non-sedentary (i.e. standing and all forms of physical activity) behaviours by changing environments which are traditionally associated with prolonged periods of sedentary behaviour, such as the school classroom. This study will make environmental changes to the classrooms of Year 5 students (aged 9-10 years) from one school in Bradford, in the UK, through the provision of manually adjustable sit-stand workstations. The primary aim is to compare the effects of this novel strategy using both full desk allocation (one per child) in one classroom and partial desk allocation (six standing desks in a class along with standard desks) in a second classroom on children's classroom sitting and standing time. Comparisons will also be made between the two intervention classrooms in the one school to children's sitting and standing behaviour measured in a control school (following usual practice). Secondary aims include evaluating the effects of the two interventions on time spent in different intensities of physical activity, health, learning and cognitive function outcomes.

This study expands on the success of the nine week pilot study, conducted in 2014, by implementing the intervention over a full academic year, having an additional intervention group, including an extra school for a control group, and including more key outcome measures (blood glucose, self-reported comfort) to better understand the impact of sit-stand desks. If successful this study will support the concept of sit-stand desks as an effective long term school based intervention for benefits in health and learning in children across all demographics

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 10 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any child with any disabilities that prevent them from standing up for short periods of time will be requested to continue with their usual practice of sitting at their school desk.
  • Children with any disabilities or injuries/illnesses that prevent them from going about their usual routine will be excluded from the evaluation component of the intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Full desk allocation
All children within this classroom received a sit-stand stand
An adjustable sit-stand desk design for children
EXPERIMENTAL: Partial desk allocation
six sit-stand desks were provided in this classroom. Children were rotated between these desks and traditional desks
An adjustable sit-stand desk design for children
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Traditional classroom furniture was used

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sitting time (mins)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in time spent sitting using activPAL inclinometer device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standing time (mins)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in time spent standing using activPAL inclinometer device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Stepping time (mins)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in time spent stepping using activPAL inclinometer device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Steps
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Steps using activPAL inclinometer device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Sit to stand transitions
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Sit to stand transitions using activPAL inclinometer device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Total acceleration per minute
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Counts per minute using ActiGraph accelerometer device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Light physical activity (mins)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Time spent in Light physical activity (mins) using ActiGraph accelerometer device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Moderate physical activity (mins)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Time spent in Moderate physical activity using ActiGraph accelerometer device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Vigorous physical activity (mins)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Time spent in vigorous physical activity using ActiGraph accelerometer device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Resting Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Resting systolic blood pressure using automated Omron device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Resting diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Resting diastolic blood pressure using automated Omron device
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Height (m)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in height measured with portable Stadiometer
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Weight (kg)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in weight measured with electronic weighing scales
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Body Mass index (kg/m2)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in BMI calculated from height and weight measures
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
waist circumference (cm)
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in waist circumference measured using anthropometry tape
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Stroop test
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Computer based cognitive function test lasting 5 mins
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Corsi block tapping test
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Computer based cognitive function test lasting 5 mins
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Rapid visual information processing test
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in Computer based cognitive function test lasting 5 mins
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
musculoskeletal discomfort
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in discomfort using a self-report paper-based survey of 7 body parts. scale of 1-5, 1 is good, 5 is bad
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Behaviour related mental health
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months
Change in behaviour measured with a teacher completed 25 item Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire. each item is scored either "not true", "somewhat true" or "certainly true"
7 days at baseline, 4 months, 8 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standing class fidelity
Time Frame: 30 minutes at 4 months
sitting and standing behaviour recorded via direct observation by researcher
30 minutes at 4 months
Experiences of using standing desks
Time Frame: 30 mins at 4 months
focus groups with pupils exploring barriers and facilitators to sitting, standing and learning in the classroom
30 mins at 4 months
Experiences of teaching with standing desks
Time Frame: 60 mins at 4 months
Interviews with teachers exploring barriers and facilitators to sitting, standing and teaching in the classroom
60 mins at 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stacy A Clemes, PhD, Loughborough University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R15-P086

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Ergotron LearnFit Sit-Stand desk

Subscribe