The Use of Laser in the Treatment of Atrophic Vulvovaginitis

August 5, 2022 updated by: CLAUDIA ESTER MARCHITELLI, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

The Use of Laser in the Treatment of Atrophic Vulvovaginitis and Its Consequent Improvement in Sexual Satisfaction

This study evaluates the efficacy and security of laser for atrophy treatment. Half of participants will receive the laser treatment and the other half placebo.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Thermal laser treatments are proposed as the newest treatments for atrophy. Through the thermal effect it would stimulates de mucosa, enhances the collagen component and the vascularization. Collagen remodeling and new collagen synthesis has been suggested as a mechanism of laser induced skin resurfacing and remodeling of vaginal connective tissue.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Caba, Argentina, 1199
        • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Menopause women with vulvovaginal symptoms of atrophy
  • No previous estrogen treatment for the last 30 days
  • Active sexual life (vaginal penetration)
  • Accept to participate
  • Pap atrophy or hypotrophy in the last year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vulvovaginal diseases
  • Abnormal uterine bleeding
  • Antidepressants drugs
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Cervical intraepithelial lesions or cancer
  • Photosensitized or under treatment with photosensibilized drugs
  • Collagen diseases
  • Vulvovaginal infections in the last 15 days
  • Immunosuppressed patients or under immunosuppressed treatments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1 - Laser intervention
Laser diiodo treatment, 3 procedures of 5-10 minutes at intervals of 4 weeks
3 laser diiodo procedures of 5-10 minutes at intervals of 4 weeks It is an outpatient procedure, not anesthesia required.
Placebo Comparator: 2 - Laser placebo
Only the laser speculum is placed in the vagina but the laser is not activated. 3 procedures of 5-10 minutes at intervals of 4 weeks
3 laser diiodo procedures of 5-10 minutes at intervals of 4 weeks. It is an outpatient procedure, not anesthesia required.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, and week 4 after treatment
Female Sexual Function Index is a self- administered questionnaire that evaluate 19 items about sexual life. Minimum score is 2, and the highest is 36. Higher score mean a better outcome
baseline, and week 4 after treatment
Change from Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline,and week 12 after treatment
Female Sexual Function Index is a self- administered questionnaire that evaluate 19 items about sexual life. Minimum score is 2, and the highest is 36. Higher score mean a better outcome
baseline,and week 12 after treatment
Change from Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, and week 36 after treatment
Female Sexual Function Index is a self- administered questionnaire that evaluate 19 items about sexual life. Minimum score is 2, and the highest is 36. Higher score mean a better outcome
baseline, and week 36 after treatment
Vaginal Cytology Improvement
Time Frame: baseline, and week 4 after treatment
Vagina cytology will be obtain to evaluate initial conditions of the vagina and modifications after treatment. Papanicolaou coloration and the count of superficial, intermediate, parabasal and basal cells will be applied to measure improvement of vaginal atrophy
baseline, and week 4 after treatment
Vaginal Cytology Improvement
Time Frame: baseline, and week 12 after treatment
Vagina cytology will be obtain to evaluate initial conditions of the vagina and modifications after treatment. Papanicolaou coloration and the count of superficial, intermediate, parabasal and basal cells will be applied to measure improvement of vaginal atrophy
baseline, and week 12 after treatment
Vaginal Cytology Improvement
Time Frame: baseline, and week 36 after treatment
Vagina cytology will be obtain to evaluate initial conditions of the vagina and modifications after treatment. Papanicolaou coloration and the count of superficial, intermediate, parabasal and basal cells will be applied to measure improvement of vaginal atrophy
baseline, and week 36 after treatment
Change in vaginal acidity measure
Time Frame: baseline, and week 4 after treatment
the normal vaginal acidity is between 3,8 a 4,5. In postmenopausal women is higher. We are going to evaluate the improvement in vaginal acidity to normal values of premenopausal women. It will be evaluate with specific acidity measurement strips (this strips measures between 3.8 y 5.4)
baseline, and week 4 after treatment
Change in vaginal acidity measure
Time Frame: baseline, and week 12 after treatment
the normal vaginal acidity is between 3,8 a 4,5. In postmenopausal women is higher. We are going to evaluate the improvement in vaginal acidity to normal values of premenopausal women. It will be evaluate with specific acidity measurement strips (this strips measures between 3.8 y 5.4)
baseline, and week 12 after treatment
Change in vaginal pH measure
Time Frame: baseline,and week 36 after treatment
the normal vaginal ph is between 3,8 a 4,5. In postmenopausal women is higher. We are going to evaluate the improvement in vaginal acidity to normal values of premenopausal women. It will be evaluate with specific acidity measurement strips (this strips measures between 3.8 y 5.4)
baseline,and week 36 after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patient with Local Estrogen therapy requirement post intervention
Time Frame: baseline,and week 48
Number of patients that Need estrogen replacement for atrophy vulvovaginal symptoms, despite the intervention.This will be evaluate with a Yes/No question.
baseline,and week 48

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participant with Adverse events reported in each visit
Time Frame: Baseline,and week 48
It will be evaluate the number of patients that reported adverse events such as dyspareunia, irritation, edema, vaginal dryness, genital bleeding, vaginal discharge, pain, lesions
Baseline,and week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: claudia E Marchitelli, MD, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lasers

Clinical Trials on Laser diiodo

3
Subscribe