The Role of Virtual Reality in Orthopaedic Surgery Education

March 7, 2020 updated by: Mark H Gonzalez, University of Illinois at Chicago

The Role of Virtual Reality in Orthopaedic Surgery Education: A Randomized Control Trial

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality are becoming prominent in the medical sciences due to the increasing sophistication of VR technology and its improving haptics to simulate real-life situations. Previous medical VR studies focused on arthroscopic minimally-invasive procedures which often do not carry the risk of invasive procedures. OssoVR, an orthopedic surgery virtual reality company, has created a platform to run through different invasive orthopedic procedures prior to operating on a patient. Given that invasive procedures inherently carry more risk and variability than minimally invasive procedures, training tools to help with these operations are vital prior to performing on a patient. The research team will evaluate the face validity, transfer validity, and surgical recall of the orthopedic virtual reality software in an intramedullary (IM) tibial nail procedure. The research team will evaluate the simulation with medical students who have not had prior exposure to the procedure. Including medical students will allow for a larger sample size for more analysis. An IM tibial nail procedure is used in tibial fractures to help stabilize the fractured long bone via placement of a nail within the bone.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Virtual reality has the potential to make a significant impact on medical education at both the medical student and resident level. OssoVR is one of the first companies that has produced functioning software for this niche student group. Medical students gain intimate knowledge regarding the musculoskeletal system helpful for the board exam and a unique insight into procedures they will see during clerkship. This offers them a larger potential to learn when seeing the procedure in the OR, and a view of orthopedic surgery they might not have if they decide to go into other specialties. Testing its efficacy on medical students will help reveal whether or not it may be helpful to have residents use virtual reality rather than reading a step-by-step guide, which is currently the norm for residents after observing the procedure performed by an attending. There is strong agreement in the literature that simulation technology should be a required part of orthopedic residence training (5) and that it improves resident surgical performance. The study was limited to medical students due to the limited number of orthopedic residents at UIC that have not seen an IM tibial nail procedure.

Objectives/Aims

Aim I. Test the procedural competence of the VR versus the step-by-step guide of IM tibial nail. I will have all of the students go through the procedure on SawBones separately. SawBones are artificial bones used to help train orthopedic students on how to perform a surgery prior to performing the surgery. To ensure blinding, Dr. Gonzalez evaluate their performance as he is a professional in orthopedic surgery and has the appropriate background for proper evaluation of accuracy. He will evaluate their time to complete the procedure, their accuracy in following the steps, and their OSATS score which is used to evaluate surgical technical skills.

Aim II. Evaluate how the students who completed the VR simulation felt regarding it. After going through the tibial nail simulation, the students will take a subjective survey regarding how they felt about the experience adapted from a current questionnaire used for virtual environment experiences .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 27 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1st or 2nd year medical students at University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine

Exclusion Criteria:

  • if they had done or ever seen a tibial nail procedure in the past

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtual Reality Group
This group will go through the virtual reality simulation of a procedure prior to doing it on a plastic SawBone.
A machine which immerses the participant in a simulated environment where they can perform a procedure.
No Intervention: Technique Guide Group
This group will go be able to read through a technique guide on the procedure prior to doing it on a plastic SawBone. This is the current method of learning in surgical residencies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completion Rate
Time Frame: day 10-14
Which participants completed the SawBones procedure
day 10-14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Steps Performed Correctly - Accuracy
Time Frame: Within 25 minutes
How many steps did the subject follow as designated in the technique guide/virtual reality?
Within 25 minutes
Time of Completion
Time Frame: up to 25 minutes
How quickly did each participant complete the surgical procedure, if completed it all?
up to 25 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark H Gonzalez, MD, University of Illinois at Chicago

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-0335

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Virtual Reality

Clinical Trials on Virtual Reality

Subscribe