Fecal Microbial Transplantation for Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis Patients

April 2, 2020 updated by: michal roll, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

An Exploratory Pilot Study Assessing the Efficacy of Fecal Microbial Transplantation for Clinical and Endoscopic Characteristics of Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis Patients

The investigator is hypothesize that an intensive FMT regimen will have superior efficacy the treatment of inflammatory disorders of the pouch (pouchitis and CLDP).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Study Design:

An open label non-controlled clinical trial.

Study population:

Patients aged 18 to 80 years with a confirmed diagnosis of UC , who underwent IPAA.

Recruitment of the study population:

Patients will be enrolled at the Pouch Clinic of the Tel Aviv Medical Center Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and at the Department of Colorectal Surgery.

Study procedure:

The study includes six visits to the IBD clinic and phone calls between visits. At baseline, after 8 weeks and after one year of intervention, all patients will undergo pouchoscopy which will be recorded and scored for pouch endoscopic score (Appendix 2). In all three procedures, samples will be collected for future analysis.

According to their endoscopic evaluation at baseline, patients will be categorized as those with an inflamed pouch (cuff, afferent loop, pouch inlet, J-pouch, pouch outlet or pouch mid-line scare) or non inflamed pouch (irritable pouch patients) according to a pouch endoscopic score (PES) and the modified pouch disease activity index endoscopic domain (mPDAI).

Baseline pouchoscopy will include FMT, followed by capsule FMT after 1 week (15 capsules), and after 4 weeks of the study.

All patients will undergo clinical followup at week 4 of the study (mPDAI clinical domain, PCS and PGA) and a second pouchoscopy after 8 weeks.

Clinical follow up will be performed at week 12 of the study, and an annual endoscopic follow up will be preformed at 52 weeks or per personal indication.

Data collection at baseline and follow-up visits will include:

  1. Clinical assessment:

    • Pouch clinical score (PCS)
    • mPDAI - clinical domains
    • Physician Global Assessment (PGA)
    • Pouch endoscopic score (PES)
  2. Collection of biological samples:

    • Stool for analysis of calprotectin level and microbiome
    • Urine for analysis of metabolomics
    • Serum for analysis of complete blood count (CBC), serum levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP), albumin, creatinine, liver enzymes
    • Tissue samples collected during pouchoscopy at baseline and followup - samples will be collected from the cuff, pouch body and pouch inlet.
  3. Anthropocentric measures will be assessed (weight, height)
  4. Complete study questionnaires:

    • A validated lifestyle and food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)
    • Three day food diary
    • Quality of life questionnaire (SF-12)
    • Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
    • Life style questionnaire

Safety assessments:

will include history taking, vital signs, physical examinations and laboratory analysis during each visit. Patients who discontinue the trial treatment will continue to be followed as per protocol. Follow-up will be discontinued in patients who withdraw informed consent or are lost for follow-up. All adverse events will be registered as: unrelated, possible related, likely related or definitely related to the intervention. SAEs will be communicated immediately to the IRB.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Tel Aviv, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Dep. of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nitsan Maharshak, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Naomi Fliss Isakov, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nathaniel Aviv Cohen, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 18 to 80 years with a confirmed diagnosis of UC, who underwent IPAA.
  2. Endoscopic deterioration or Clinically suspected pouchitis, defined as increased bowel frequency (≥1 stools) relative to post-IPAA baseline (1-3 months post IPAA).
  3. Clinically stable patients on constant medical regimen throughout the study period. Treated by mesalamine for at least 6 weeks, or steroids at least 2 week, or immunomodulator or biologic at least 12 weeks, medical cannabis at least 2 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis prior to IPAA.
  2. Positive stool test for parasites or stool culture for pathological bacteria within 60 days prior to enrollment.
  3. Evidence or history of Clostridium difficile infection within 60 days prior to enrollment.
  4. Active clinically significant infection (within 60 days of enrollment).
  5. Active septic pouch complication (e.g., abscess, leak, fistula).
  6. Post-surgical complication of the pouch (e.g., obstruction, stricture, volvulus, prolapse).
  7. Pregnancy or lactation.
  8. Unstable or uncontrolled medical disorder (other than suspected pouchitis).
  9. Inability to give informed consent and complete the study protocol.
  10. Patient participating in other concomitant clinical intervention trial or who had received any experimental drug within a month prior to enrollment
  11. Patients received antibiotics within 2 days of enrollment, or are anticipated to use antibiotics or probiotics within the study period (elective surgery or dental care).
  12. Patients received fecal transplantation in the last 6 months.
  13. Fever>38°c
  14. An active malignant disease or a prior malignancy during the previous 5 years (excluding skin BCC).
  15. Inability or reluctance to follow through with the study protocol, including (but not exclusive) to: colonoscopy, enema, study visit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of UC who underwent IPAA
Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be enrolled and will sign an informed consent form. The study includes six visits to the IBD clinic and phone calls between visits.
  1. At baseline, the fecal fluid from 3 different donors, 150 ml, will be delivered via pouchoscopy after which the patient will roll in to the right lateral position and stay in that position for at least 15 minutes. Prior to the procedure, the patient will fast for 12 hours and preform two fleet enemas as preperation.
  2. FMT at 7 days and 4 weeks will be delivered via ingestion of 15 capsules containing 650 µL of fecal fluid from 3 different donors (the same three donors as at baseline).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
safety of fecal microbial transplantation in pouch patients by disease exacerbations
Time Frame: 1 year
determine whether manipulation of gut microbiome by FMT to IPAA patients is safe safety of FMT will be measured by rate of patients with disease exacerbations
1 year
safety of fecal microbial transplantation in pouch patients by hospitalizations of patients
Time Frame: 1 year
determine whether manipulation of gut microbiome by FMT to IPAA patients is safe safety of FMT will be measured by amount of patients that require hospitalizations
1 year
safety of fecal microbial transplantation in pouch patients by patients requiring surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
determine whether manipulation of gut microbiome by FMT to IPAA patients is safe safety of FMT will be measured by amount of patients that require surgery
1 year
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by mPDAI decrease
Time Frame: 2 months
By preforming a pouchoscopy, mPDAI (modified pouchitis disease activity index) will be used to assess decrease of ≤1 in mPDAI in condition of the pouch comparing to baseline
2 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by clinical remission
Time Frame: 2 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients will be measured by the amount of patients with clinical remission measured by mPDAI clinical score <3
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by amount of patients with sustained remission
Time Frame: 12 months
Sustained remission as defined by mPDAI endoscopic score ≤ 1 or mPDAI endoscopic and clinical ≤ 5
12 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by amount of patients with sustained clinical remission
Time Frame: 12 months
Sustained remission as defined by mPDAI clinical <3
12 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by reduce of inflammatory markers
Time Frame: 1 month
Reduction in inflammatory markers (calprotectin and CRP)
1 month
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by reduce of inflammatory markers
Time Frame: 2 months
Reduction in inflammatory markers (calprotectin and CRP)
2 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by reduce of inflammatory markers
Time Frame: 3 months
Reduction in inflammatory markers (calprotectin and CRP)
3 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by reduce of inflammatory markers
Time Frame: 12 months
Reduction in inflammatory markers (calprotectin and CRP)
12 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by reduce of PGA (physical global assessment)
Time Frame: 1 month
Reduction in PGA (physical global assessment) comparing to baseline
1 month
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by reduce of PGA (physical global assessment)
Time Frame: 2 months
Reduction in PGA (physical global assessment) comparing to previous assessments
2 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by reduce of PGA (physical global assessment)
Time Frame: 3 months
Reduction in PGA (physical global assessment) comparing to previous assessments
3 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by reduce of PGA (physical global assessment)
Time Frame: 12 months
Reduction in PGA (physical global assessment) comparing to previous assessments
12 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by improvement of life quality
Time Frame: 1 month
efficacy of FMT by filling questionnaire describing life quality and comparing to baseline to observe improvement
1 month
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by improvement of life quality
Time Frame: 2 months
efficacy of FMT by filling questionnaire describing life quality and comparing to baseline to observe improvement
2 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by improvement of life quality
Time Frame: 3 months
efficacy of FMT by filling questionnaire describing life quality and comparing to baseline to observe improvement
3 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by improvement of life quality
Time Frame: 12 months
efficacy of FMT by filling questionnaire describing life quality and comparing to baseline to observe improvement
12 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by improvement of nutritional status
Time Frame: 1 month
improvement of patients nutritional status comparing to baseline measured by BMI (body Mass Index). Normal range is BMI of 18.5-25
1 month
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by improvement of nutritional status
Time Frame: 2 months
improvement of patients nutritional status comparing to baseline measured by BMI (body Mass Index). Normal range is BMI of 18.5-25
2 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by improvement of nutritional status
Time Frame: 3 months
improvement of patients nutritional status comparing to baseline measured by BMI (body Mass Index). Normal range is BMI of 18.5-25
3 months
efficacy of FMT in pouch patients measured by improvement of nutritional status
Time Frame: 12 months
improvement of patients nutritional status comparing to baseline measured by BMI (body Mass Index). Normal range is BMI of 18.5-25
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0210-18-TLV

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis

Clinical Trials on Fecal Microbial Transplantation

Subscribe