Cryoballoon Ablation Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation (RACE-8-HF)

March 16, 2021 updated by: Maastricht University

CRyoballoon Ablation Versus mediCal thErapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial, the RACE-8-HF Trial

Rationale:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) can cause each other and sustain each other. Combined, the two diseases negatively influence each other's prognosis and lead to higher mortality. Studies in HF patients in which the AF burden is reduced by AF ablation show promising results toward improved prognosis, but so far only one randomized trial is conducted that focused on major clinical endpoints. As the selected patients in this trial were not representative for the entire population and its ablation method varied from patient to patient, it is the aim of the present study to confirm that early invasive therapy consisting of a strict pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) protocol using cryoballoon therapy has positive effects on hard clinical endpoints in a wider variety of patients in the HF population.

Furthermore, there are no studies which compare cost-effectiveness of an early invasive strategy in this patient category. The investigators expect that avoided hospitalizations and healthcare resource utilizations lead to lower costs in the AF ablation group, despite initial higher costs of the procedure.

Objective:

To compare outcome and cost-effectiveness of early AF ablation by PVI using cryoballoon therapy with standard (medical) therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Study design:

Multicenter, randomized, open label clinical trial.

Study population:

Symptomatic adult patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) and paroxysmal or persistent AF.

Intervention:

AF ablation (PVI) using cryoballoon therapy.

Outcome measures:

The primary endpoint is a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality, unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization, and stroke (time-to-event analysis).

Secondary endpoints of the trial are:

  • A combined endpoint of mortality, number of unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations, and stroke (recurrent-event analysis);
  • A hierarchical endpoint of mortality, unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations, stroke, and HF complaints;
  • Cost-effectiveness. Key exploratory endpoints include individual components of the combined endpoints, days alive out of the hospital, hospitalizations for heart failure, recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, and quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525 GA
        • Recruiting
        • Radboudumc
        • Contact:
          • Dominique Verhaert, MD
    • Limburg
      • Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229 HX
        • Recruiting
        • Maastricht UMC+
        • Contact:
          • Dominique Verhaert, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-80;
  • HF with ejection fraction <40%, as assessed by recent (<6 months) echocardiography or cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR);
  • AF, documented on standard ECG or Holter monitoring;
  • Eligible for both treatment arms;
  • Signed and dated informed consent prior to admission to the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • End-stage heart failure: NYHA class IV, patients on waiting list for cardiac transplant and/or left ventricular assist device;
  • Long-standing (> 1 year) persistent or permanent AF;
  • Previous pulmonary vein isolation or surgical ablation;
  • Left atrial diameter ≥60 mm or left atrial volume index ≥50 ml/m2;
  • Impaired renal function, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤25 ml/min/1.73m2;
  • Recent (<90 days) acute coronary syndrome, cardiac intervention1, or stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA);
  • Planned or expected cardiac surgery in the following year;
  • Active infectious disease or malignancy;
  • Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the trial;
  • Contraindication for cryoballoon ablation or other condition that may prevent subjects from adhering to the trial protocol, in the opinion of the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Early invasive treatment (cryoballoon ablation)
If a patient is randomized to early invasive treatment, the ablation is performed within 3 months by an experienced cardiac electrophysiologist using CE-certified equipment. Via the femoral vein a guiding catheter is advanced through the inferior vena cava to the right atrium and into the left atrium via transseptal puncture. Then, the cryoballoon is advanced, inflated, and placed against one of the four PVs. PV occlusion is assessed by selective contrast injection. When adequate PV antral seal is confirmed, ablation of the tissue in contact with the balloon is performed using pressurized liquid nitrous oxide. The cold inflated balloon thus creates circular lesions around the PV. The balloon and tissue interface are then allowed to reach normal temperatures. Depending on local practice, the freeze-thaw cycle may be repeated twice. Electrical isolation is assessed and when it is confirmed, the next PV is treated in the same way. The procedure ends when all PV's are isolated.
Other Names:
  • Pulmonary vein isolation
  • PVI
  • CBA
NO_INTERVENTION: Standard medical care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Composite of all-cause mortality, unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations and stroke (time-to-event analysis)
Time Frame: Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Combined endpoint of all-cause mortality
Time Frame: Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Total number of unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations and stroke (recurrent-event analysis)
Time Frame: Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Hierarchal endpoint of all-cause mortality, unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations, stroke and change in heart failure complaints (hierarchical endpoint analysis)
Time Frame: Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Budget impact
Time Frame: Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)
Study duration (1-5 years, expected median follow-up duration 2 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kevin Vernooy, MD PhD, Maastricht UMC+, Radboudumc
  • Study Chair: Michiel Rienstra, MD PhD, UMC Groningen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 16, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Cryoballoon ablation

3
Subscribe