Intra Articular Injection of Microfat and PRP in Knee Osteoarthritis (MICROPREP)

April 17, 2020 updated by: Marie-Laure LOUIS, Clinique Juge

Intra Articular Injection of Autologous Microfat and Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Pilot Study

The hypothesis of this project is that the injection of an innovative treatment (microfat and dose of autologous PRP) allows to delay knee arthroplasty in patients with knee OA resistant to medical treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease in the world and one of the most common causes of pain and functional disability. The incidence of cartilage pathology has grown due to the ageing population, and the increase in sports participation and its associated trauma. The treatment of these cartilage damage is limited and remains a major public health issue.

The aim of the medical treatment and intra articular injections consists in reducing pain and improving the knee function in order to limit the sport, professional and social negative impact in the youngest patients. Nevertheless their efficacy remain non predictable in patients.

The arthroplasty will be proposed in the final intention. Insofar arthroplasty is a surgical procedure 1 / which presents a potential infectious risk associated with its invasive nature, 2 / it requires iterative revision surgery, especially in young patients given the limited lifetime of the implants and 3 / whose complete postoperative recovery take several months, it seems justified to continue studies to validate effective alternative treatments to delay the use of joint replacements.

Recently, the emergence of biotherapy in orthopedics has developed the use of intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Their use has increased substantially and is based on the demonstration that platelet-rich plasma concentrate growth factors, can stimulate cartilage regeneration in vitro and in vivo preclinical models. In humans, recent data from the literature show that these autologous products are very well tolerated. Their scientific evaluation remains difficult in that 1 / indications and surgical procedures are not harmonized 2 / manufacturing processes PRP are not standardized 3 / quantitative and qualitative composition of PRP is rarely documented.

PRP administration procedures can be optimized: indeed in that, it is a liquid preparation (platelet suspension), its administration in a interface tissue allows to limit its spread and potentiate its trophic effect on the injured cartilage site. Adipose tissue is the most relevant interface tissue given, because it's a tissue rich in stem cells with full therapeutic potential and is easily accessible by subcutaneous minimally invasive procedure. Thus, autologous microfat (fat removed under local anesthesia by manual liposuction using fine cannulas specific) administered in the synovial capsule, could play the matrix to receive the injection of PRP.

The hypothesis of this project is that the standardized injection of an innovative treatment (microfat and dose of autologous PRP) allows to delay knee arthroplasty in patients with knee OA resistant to medical treatment. This treatment, minimally invasive and with economically reasonable cost, would provide a new treatment for second intention. In terms medicoeconomic if this treatment is effective over a period of several years, even in cases where it is necessary to do it one or two times, it would significantly reduce the financial and societal impact of joint replacements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13008
        • Louis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females between 20 to 65 years of age
  • Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis , ICRS grade 2, 3 ou 4 with VAS > 4 and failure of medical treatment for at least one year
  • BMI between 20 to 30
  • Written informed consent, signed by patient or legal representative
  • HB > 10g/dl
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Social security affiliated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • IRM contre-indications: ocular loose bodies, pace maker, neurostimulateur, cochlear implant, vascular clips, mettalic cardiac valve
  • BMI < 20
  • Thrombocytopenia < 150 G/L
  • Thrombocytosis > 450 G/L
  • Thrombopathy
  • TP < 70%
  • TCA patient / witness rapport > 1,20
  • Anaemia: HB < 10g/dl
  • Positive serology VIH1 and 2, Agp24, Ac HCV, Ag HbS, AcHbc, Ac HTLV I and II, TPHA
  • Treatment by platelet inhibiting agent, aspirin, anti vitamin K completed more than 2 weeks before inclusion
  • Chronic treatment by corticosteroid per os or treatment completed more than 2 weeks before inclusion
  • Intra articular knee injection of corticosteroid more than 8 weeks before inclusion
  • Intra articular knee injection of hyaluronic acid more than 8 weeks before inclusion
  • NSAI treatment completed more than 2 weeks before inclusion
  • Fever or recent disease
  • Auto immune disease
  • Inflammatory Arthritis
  • Immune deficit
  • Infectious disease
  • Malignant tumor being treated or history of malignant tumor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Microfat + PRP 3M platelets
microfat (5 ml) associated with PRP with a dose of 3 billions of platelets (5 ml)
Articular knee injection of microfat associated with a dose of 3 billions of platelets or associated with a dose of 1 billion of platelets or with saline solution
Experimental: Microfat + PRP 1M platelets
microfat (5 ml) associated with PRP with a dose of 1 billion of platelets (5 ml)
Articular knee injection of microfat associated with a dose of 3 billions of platelets or associated with a dose of 1 billion of platelets or with saline solution
Experimental: Microfat
microfat (5 ml) and saline solution (5 ml)
Articular knee injection of microfat associated with a dose of 3 billions of platelets or associated with a dose of 1 billion of platelets or with saline solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cartilage relaxation time on MRI T2-mapping at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post injection
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of intra-articular injection of autologous microfat associated with a standardized preparation of autologous PRP, by changes in the cartilage relaxation time on MRI T2-mapping at 3 months.
Baseline and 3 months post injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improved of chondral lesion on MRI
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and 6 months post injection
Improved chondral lesions at 3 months and 6 months on specific MRI cartilage sequences (DP FATSAT Axial, Axial T1, T2 mapping): quantitative morphological sequences resolution and qualitative structural sequences.
Baseline and 3 and 6 months post injection
Pain
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 and 3 and 6 months post injection
The evolution of pain with the visual analogic scale compared to the initial state (scores at baseline) and the evolution of pain (VAS score) at 1, 3 and 6 months post-injection. Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal pain)
Baseline and 1 and 3 and 6 months post injection
Responding patients
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and 6 months post injection
The proportion of patients not responding to treatment.
Baseline and 3 and 6 months post injection
Biologic parameters / clinical efficacity
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 and 6 months post injection
The correlation between clinical efficacy and dose of PRP administered and dose of growth factors administered.
Baseline and 3 and 6 months post injection
WOMAC
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 and 3 and 6 months post injection
The evolution of the functional impact of knee osteoarthritis with the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis score at 1, 3 and 6 months post-injection. Score from 0 to 96 (the worst)
Baseline and 1 and 3 and 6 months post injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie Laure Louis, MD, ICOS Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-004755-75 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Publication

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Autologous biologic drug of innovative therapy /cell therapy drug

Subscribe