Muscle Wasting in Children and Adolescents With Cancer

September 7, 2020 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Assessment and Management of Muscle Wasting in Children and Adolescents With Cancer

The series of the 3-year study aims to explore parents' experience of caring for a child's weight change among parents of children and adolescents with cancer, examine the associations and trends among muscle wasting and health-related variables, and then implement and assess effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach with a personalized physical activity (walking) training intervention on improving muscle mass and other health-related variables.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Specific aims, year by year

  1. The aim for Year 1 is as follows:

    Aim 1: To explore parents' experience of caring for promoting a child's exercise among parents of children and adolescents with cancer.

  2. The aims for Year 2 are as follows:

    Aim 2-1: To examine the associations between the degree of muscle wasting and health-related variables (fatigue level, symptom distress level, physical activity involvement, dietary intake, and QoL) among children and adolescents with cancer.

    Aim 2-2: To examine the trends of changes in muscle wasting and health-related variables (fatigue level, symptom distress level, physical activity involvement, dietary intake, and QoL) during the first 6 months of cancer treatment among children and adolescents with cancer.

  3. The aim for Year 3 is as follows:

Aim 3: To examine the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach with a personalized walking exercise program on changes in body composition and health-related variables (fatigue level, symptom distress level, subjective physical activity involvement, objective physical activity measurement, dietary intake, and QoL) among children and adolescents with cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

440

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10051
        • Recruiting
        • NTUH
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aim 1:(1) parents of children diagnosed with malignancies at 3-18 years old, (2) whose children have received cancer treatment for at least 6 months, (3) who are the main caregivers, and (4) who are willing to participate in the study.
  • Aim 2-1:(1) children and adolescents diagnosed with malignancies at 3-18 years old, (2) who are previously or currently treated for cancer, and (3) who are willing to participate in the study. Two hundred patients will be recruited.
  • Aim 2-2:(1) children and adolescents diagnosed with malignancies at 3-18 years old, (2) newly diagnosed with cancer within the past 1 month, and (3) willing to participate in the study. One hundred participants will be recruited.
  • Aim 3:(1) children and adolescents aged 3-18 years old and are undergoing treatment, and (2) who are willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

-Aim 1-3: Children and adolescents are under poor physical or cognitive conditions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: control group
The patients in the control group will not receive any walking exercise education until the 4-week intervention ends. They will then receive the same education material ("How walking is beneficial to your health") and will be told about the benefits of walking.
Experimental: experimental group
Participants in the experimental group will also be educated on the general use of the ActiGraph through verbal and written information and will be asked to wear the ActiGraph during week 0 for 3 consecutive days. The collected physical activity parameters will be the baseline data.Afterward, participants in the experimental group will be educated with the educational materials "How walking is beneficial to muscle mass and your health." And then the ActiGraph will be collected by the research assistant in order to analyze the physical activity parameters, including time spent walking and walking steps. A final assessment will be conducted at week 4. The participant will be reminded that the ActiGraph and the post-test questionnaires will be picked up at the end of week 4.
During the 4-week intervention, participants will be given stickers by the research assistant to increase their motivation to walk. A sticker will be given once a participant reaches a daily walking-time goal. The number of stickers participants receive depends on the number of days they reach their daily goals. The stickers can be redeemed for the participant's choice of gift in the gift shelf of the ward or on a gift card. A final assessment will be conducted at week 4. The participant will be reminded that the ActiGraph and the post-test questionnaires will be picked up at the end of week 4

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographics
Time Frame: baseline
age, age at diagnosis, diagnosis, cancer recurrence or not, treatment status, gender, education, parents' education, height, and body weight.
baseline
Lab data
Time Frame: baseline
protein profile (albumin), lipid profile (TG, cholesterol, LDH, HDH), liver profile (GOT, GPT), CBC profile (HB, RBC, WBC/DC, platelet), renal profile (BUN, CRE), inflammation index (CRP), and sugar profile (Glucose-AC and HbA1C) at diagnosis and at study baseline.
baseline
Medication dosage
Time Frame: baseline
accumulated corticosteroid dosage, accumulated radiation dosage.
baseline
Cachexia assessment
Time Frame: baseline
This assessment includes weight loss grading and muscle power grading. Weight loss grading uses a 5x5 matrix to grade the patient's level of cancer-associated weight loss.Grade 0 = complete paralysis; Grade 1 = flicker of contraction present; Grade 2 = active movement with gravity eliminated; Grade 3 = active movement against gravity; Grade 4 = active movement against gravity and some resistance described as poor, fair, or moderate strength; and Grade 5 = normal power.
baseline
Inbody S10
Time Frame: Week 0
The InBody S10 BIA device measures resistance at six frequencies (1, 5, 50, 250, 500, and 1000 KHz).
Week 0
Inbody S10
Time Frame: Week 4
The InBody S10 BIA device measures resistance at six frequencies (1, 5, 50, 250, 500, and 1000 KHz).
Week 4
Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (MFS):
Time Frame: week 4
MFS versions are designed for ages 5-18. The parent proxy reports, which include children 2-4 years of age (toddler), are used to assess the parent's perception of their child's fatigue. The instrument consists of 18 items. Patients are assessed on how often a particular problem occurred in the past month by using a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4 and rescaled to 0-100, so that higher scores indicate fewer symptoms of fatigue.
week 4
Symptom Distress Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: Week 0(baseline)
The SDS is a 5-point mixed-response scale with 13 items that measure symptom distress. Total scores range from 13 to 65; higher scores indicate more severe symptom distress during the past week.
Week 0(baseline)
Symptom Distress Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: week 1
The SDS is a 5-point mixed-response scale with 13 items that measure symptom distress. Total scores range from 13 to 65; higher scores indicate more severe symptom distress during the past week.
week 1
Symptom Distress Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: week 2
The SDS is a 5-point mixed-response scale with 13 items that measure symptom distress. Total scores range from 13 to 65; higher scores indicate more severe symptom distress during the past week.
week 2
Symptom Distress Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: week 3
The SDS is a 5-point mixed-response scale with 13 items that measure symptom distress. Total scores range from 13 to 65; higher scores indicate more severe symptom distress during the past week.
week 3
Symptom Distress Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: week 4
The SDS is a 5-point mixed-response scale with 13 items that measure symptom distress. Total scores range from 13 to 65; higher scores indicate more severe symptom distress during the past week.
week 4
Exercise Involvement Scale (EIS)
Time Frame: Week 0(baseline)
Exercise involvement is calculated by the equation: Exercise Involvement Score = exercise frequency x (exercise intensity + exercise duration). The total score represents an individual's level of exercise involvement. There are six graded response options, ranging from 1 (zero) to 6 (5 or more times a week). A higher score indicates more frequent exercise during the past week.
Week 0(baseline)
Exercise Involvement Scale (EIS)
Time Frame: week 1
Exercise involvement is calculated by the equation: Exercise Involvement Score = exercise frequency x (exercise intensity + exercise duration). The total score represents an individual's level of exercise involvement. There are six graded response options, ranging from 1 (zero) to 6 (5 or more times a week). A higher score indicates more frequent exercise during the past week.
week 1
Exercise Involvement Scale (EIS)
Time Frame: week 2
Exercise involvement is calculated by the equation: Exercise Involvement Score = exercise frequency x (exercise intensity + exercise duration). The total score represents an individual's level of exercise involvement. There are six graded response options, ranging from 1 (zero) to 6 (5 or more times a week). A higher score indicates more frequent exercise during the past week.
week 2
Exercise Involvement Scale (EIS)
Time Frame: week 3
Exercise involvement is calculated by the equation: Exercise Involvement Score = exercise frequency x (exercise intensity + exercise duration). The total score represents an individual's level of exercise involvement. There are six graded response options, ranging from 1 (zero) to 6 (5 or more times a week). A higher score indicates more frequent exercise during the past week.
week 3
Exercise Involvement Scale (EIS)
Time Frame: week 4
Exercise involvement is calculated by the equation: Exercise Involvement Score = exercise frequency x (exercise intensity + exercise duration). The total score represents an individual's level of exercise involvement. There are six graded response options, ranging from 1 (zero) to 6 (5 or more times a week). A higher score indicates more frequent exercise during the past week.
week 4
Visual analogue scale for dietary intake (VAS-DI)
Time Frame: Week 0(baseline)
Patients are asked to answer the question: "If you consider that, at times when you are in good health, you eat 10 out of 10, how much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 to 10?" A response of 0 would mean eating "nothing at all" and 10 would be eating "as usual." For patients who do not understand this question, the researcher helps by adding: "How do you currently eat at this moment: a quarter of the usual amount, half of the usual amount, or three-quarters of the usual amount?" Patients tick a 100-mm line traced on paper to answer the inquiry "How much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 'nothing' (far left side of the line) to 10 'as usual' (far right side of the line)?" The left extremity of the line is anchored by "I eat nothing at all" (0 cm), the middle by "I eat half the usual amount" (5 cm), and the right extremity by "I eat as usual" (10 cm).
Week 0(baseline)
Visual analogue scale for dietary intake (VAS-DI)
Time Frame: week 1
Patients are asked to answer the question: "If you consider that, at times when you are in good health, you eat 10 out of 10, how much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 to 10?" A response of 0 would mean eating "nothing at all" and 10 would be eating "as usual." For patients who do not understand this question, the researcher helps by adding: "How do you currently eat at this moment: a quarter of the usual amount, half of the usual amount, or three-quarters of the usual amount?" Patients tick a 100-mm line traced on paper to answer the inquiry "How much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 'nothing' (far left side of the line) to 10 'as usual' (far right side of the line)?" The left extremity of the line is anchored by "I eat nothing at all" (0 cm), the middle by "I eat half the usual amount" (5 cm), and the right extremity by "I eat as usual" (10 cm).
week 1
Visual analogue scale for dietary intake (VAS-DI)
Time Frame: week 2
Patients are asked to answer the question: "If you consider that, at times when you are in good health, you eat 10 out of 10, how much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 to 10?" A response of 0 would mean eating "nothing at all" and 10 would be eating "as usual." For patients who do not understand this question, the researcher helps by adding: "How do you currently eat at this moment: a quarter of the usual amount, half of the usual amount, or three-quarters of the usual amount?" Patients tick a 100-mm line traced on paper to answer the inquiry "How much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 'nothing' (far left side of the line) to 10 'as usual' (far right side of the line)?" The left extremity of the line is anchored by "I eat nothing at all" (0 cm), the middle by "I eat half the usual amount" (5 cm), and the right extremity by "I eat as usual" (10 cm).
week 2
Visual analogue scale for dietary intake (VAS-DI)
Time Frame: week 3
Patients are asked to answer the question: "If you consider that, at times when you are in good health, you eat 10 out of 10, how much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 to 10?" A response of 0 would mean eating "nothing at all" and 10 would be eating "as usual." For patients who do not understand this question, the researcher helps by adding: "How do you currently eat at this moment: a quarter of the usual amount, half of the usual amount, or three-quarters of the usual amount?" Patients tick a 100-mm line traced on paper to answer the inquiry "How much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 'nothing' (far left side of the line) to 10 'as usual' (far right side of the line)?" The left extremity of the line is anchored by "I eat nothing at all" (0 cm), the middle by "I eat half the usual amount" (5 cm), and the right extremity by "I eat as usual" (10 cm).
week 3
Visual analogue scale for dietary intake (VAS-DI)
Time Frame: week 4
Patients are asked to answer the question: "If you consider that, at times when you are in good health, you eat 10 out of 10, how much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 to 10?" A response of 0 would mean eating "nothing at all" and 10 would be eating "as usual." For patients who do not understand this question, the researcher helps by adding: "How do you currently eat at this moment: a quarter of the usual amount, half of the usual amount, or three-quarters of the usual amount?" Patients tick a 100-mm line traced on paper to answer the inquiry "How much do you currently eat on a scale from 0 'nothing' (far left side of the line) to 10 'as usual' (far right side of the line)?" The left extremity of the line is anchored by "I eat nothing at all" (0 cm), the middle by "I eat half the usual amount" (5 cm), and the right extremity by "I eat as usual" (10 cm).
week 4
PedsQL
Time Frame: Week 0(baseline)
The PedsQL Cancer Module is designed to measure pediatric cancer-specific health-related QoL in patients ages 2-18 years. The scale consists of 27 items that address eight dimensions: pain and hurt, nausea, procedural anxiety, treatment anxiety, worry, cognitive problems, perceived physical appearance, and communication. Items are rated on a 5-point scale
Week 0(baseline)
PedsQL
Time Frame: week 4
The PedsQL Cancer Module is designed to measure pediatric cancer-specific health-related QoL in patients ages 2-18 years. The scale consists of 27 items that address eight dimensions: pain and hurt, nausea, procedural anxiety, treatment anxiety, worry, cognitive problems, perceived physical appearance, and communication. Items are rated on a 5-point scale
week 4
ActiGraph
Time Frame: Week 0(baseline)
The ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer is a reliable and valid tool for assessing objective activity level, validated in participants ages 7-18 years. It captures and records continuous raw acceleration data, which will be downloaded in 60-second epochs using ActiLife 6.13.3 software.
Week 0(baseline)
ActiGraph
Time Frame: week 1
The ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer is a reliable and valid tool for assessing objective activity level, validated in participants ages 7-18 years. It captures and records continuous raw acceleration data, which will be downloaded in 60-second epochs using ActiLife 6.13.3 software.
week 1
ActiGraph
Time Frame: week 2
The ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer is a reliable and valid tool for assessing objective activity level, validated in participants ages 7-18 years. It captures and records continuous raw acceleration data, which will be downloaded in 60-second epochs using ActiLife 6.13.3 software.
week 2
ActiGraph
Time Frame: week 3
The ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer is a reliable and valid tool for assessing objective activity level, validated in participants ages 7-18 years. It captures and records continuous raw acceleration data, which will be downloaded in 60-second epochs using ActiLife 6.13.3 software.
week 3
ActiGraph
Time Frame: week 4
The ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer is a reliable and valid tool for assessing objective activity level, validated in participants ages 7-18 years. It captures and records continuous raw acceleration data, which will be downloaded in 60-second epochs using ActiLife 6.13.3 software.
week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wei-Wen Wu, PhD, National Taiwan University, College of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Development

Clinical Trials on Multidisciplinary care with a personalized care

3
Subscribe