Quality Contract: Prevention of Postoperative Delirium in the Care of Older Patients (QV-POD-2)

July 6, 2023 updated by: Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Quality Contract Prevention of Postoperative Delirium in the Care of Older Patients (QV-POD-2)

The project "QV-Delirium" is based on the decision of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) from 2017. The aim is to improve inpatient care for older patients who are undergoing inpatient surgery and thus to specifically reduce the postoperative risk of delirium. This is achieved through the implementation of evidence-based and consensus-based measures to prevent postoperative delirium in a comprehensive structured concept in routine care. The transparent documentation in an electronic patient file enables the relationships between the symptoms to be depicted in accordance with the clinical circumstances and the genesis of the postoperative delirium to be recorded and treated at an early stage.The independent Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Health Care (IQTIG) receives the elements predefined (e.g. incidence of delirium) by IQTIG with which the quality is measured. The content of the additional elements from the routine data (see primary and secondary outcome measures) is merged internally and with BARMER and other health insurance data for a joint evaluation.

Subproject 1:

Preoperative evaluation of systolic and diastolic heart function in patients of the QV delirium cohort:

In this process, this subproject relates to the evaluation of patients during the premedication visit. During the visit, an evaluation of the heart function using TTE should also take place in order to be able to evaluate later whether there is a association between the preoperative cardiac function examined and the development of postoperative delirium. The parameters to be collected are for the systolic heart function (LVEF, TAPSE, rest LV-SV and SVI, LVCO, LVCI LV / RV index, as well as for the diastolic dysfunction according to current recommendations (Nagueh SF et al., 2016) : MV DecT, MV E / A ratio, E'lat, E'sept, E ', E / E', IVRT-LV, S ', A', LAVI, tricuspid valve flow in tricuspid valve insufficiency: TR V max.

Subproject 2 starts in April 2022:

Anonymous quantitative employee (nurses and doctors) survey on the content of the quality contract with regard to employee satisfaction, feasibility, effectiveness, efficiency (cost-benefit balance), acceptance, needs, quality of the introduction, quality of the implementation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The quality contract of the Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin QV-POD was contractually extended so that the patients of the Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin can be offered the preventive measures for delirium for another 5 years (07/01/2023 - 06/30/2028). The continuation of the contract is referred to with the short title QV-POD-2. In terms of content, all preventive measures known from QV-POD will be continued.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

18100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 12203
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CBF), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sascha Treskatsch, MD, Prof.
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lennart Junge, MD
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK) Berlin, Carité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fatima Yürek, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Daniel Hadzidiakos, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Claudia Spies, MD, Prof.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Laerson Hoff
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Maurice Breithaupt, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Antje Kirchstein, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged ≥70 years, male and female, who are receiving surgery

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age ≥ 70 years
  • male and female patients
  • Patients who are insured with BARMER, HEK, KKH, DAK, TK or hkk Health insurances
  • Patients eligible for inclusion: by the patient, preoperatively
  • Incapacitated patients for inclusion: Written informed consent by a legal representative
  • surgery (elective and not elective)

Exclusion criteria:

  • Moribund patients
  • Not enough language skills

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Cohort before training
500 patients should be asked to participate in the project in the phase of zero value measurement. The documentation of the routine data before the training phase relates to patients aged ≥70 years, male and female, who are undergoing surgery.
Cohort after training 1
From October 1st, 2020, the documentation of the routine data will begin after the training phase: 2,500 patients in 12 months, each aged ≥70 years, male and female, who will have surgery until the end of the contract on June 30th, 2023.
Cohort after documentation of routine data until June 2023
From July 1st, 2023, the documentation of the routine data will go on: 1,700 patients in 12 months, each aged ≥70 years, male and female, who will have surgery until the end of the contract on June 30th, 2028.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delirium
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Decrease in the incidence of delirium and / or shortening of the delirium duration (composite endpoint) taking into account the implementation rates of at least 80% for screening and documentation in the next five years.
Up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Routine laboratory
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Routine laboratory markers
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Routine vital parameters
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Measurement of cholinesterases
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Cholinesterases (point of care testing (POCT) measurements) are measured in the routine
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Intraoperative routine data
Time Frame: Time of surgery
Time of surgery
Drug administration during inpatient treatment
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Routine preventive measures against delirium
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Intraoperative documented peculiarities in patients with delirium
Time Frame: Time of surgery
Time of surgery
Anticholinergic drug intake
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Scale to identify the severity of anticholinergic drugs (Level 0 = no anticholinergic effect, Level 1 = mild anticholinergic effect, Level 2 = moderate anticholinergic effect, Level 3 = severe anticholinergic effect). The sum of all levels of the different drugs gives the total load. Higher total loads of anticholinergic drugs are associated with higher anticholinergic drug load. Minimum of the scale is 0. Maximum depends on the sum of each drug level. The more drugs with anticholinergic effect are taken the higher is the anticholinergic drug load.
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Incidence of postoperative delirium
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Incidence of postoperative delirium in all postoperative patients in normal ward, intensive care unit and recovery room after validated delirium screening tool at two points in time (a defined day before the start of the training measures, a defined day after the completion of the training measures).
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Electroencephalography (EEG) measurement
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Objective non-invasive EEG is measured intraoperatively
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Infections
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Infections according to surgical site infections (SSI) and according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (CDC).
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Quality of life 1
Time Frame: Up to three months
Health related quality of life is measured by EQ-5D-5L
Up to three months
Intensive care unit length of stay
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of intensive care stay, an expected average of 2 days
Intensive care unit length of stay is measured in days
Participants will be followed for the duration of intensive care stay, an expected average of 2 days
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Hospital length of stay is measured in days
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Care level
Time Frame: Up to one year
The care level is taken from hospital records preoperatively and postoperatively
Up to one year
Postoperative routine data on the ICU, in the recovery room and normal ward
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)
Time Frame: Up to one year
The composite outcome measure "PICS" of the patient is measured according to Needham et al 2012: new impairment or worsening of health after intensive care unit stay and at the same time clinically significant distress in at least one of the following outcome measurement instruments: Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-9, PHQ-8, PHQ-4), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scales (GAD-2 and GAD-7), Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R), MiniCog, Animal Naming Test, Trail Making Test (TMT-A, TMT-B), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Satus (RBANS), Timed Up-and-Go (TUG), Handgrip Strength, EQ-5D-5L, subjective assessment NRS, WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). The Measurement will be performed, when patients present to the outpatient clinic for follow-up examinations. Optionally, the measurement can also be performed via outpatient structures or during a home visit.
Up to one year
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
To evaluate the presence or development of postoperative organ complications during inpatient care
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Pain threshold measurement
Time Frame: During the operation
Automatic measurement of specific pain is measured by pain tracker
During the operation
Analgesia consumption
Time Frame: Up to one year
Concomitant pain medication is recorded
Up to one year
Postoperative cognitive impairment
Time Frame: Up to three months

Telephone or Video or questionnaire Follow up is offered to every patient with POD three months and one year after their surgery intervention. The aim of Telephone or Video or questionnaire Follow up is to assess to present Neurocognitive disorder (NCD).

The Follow up screening tool is based on DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for "mild cognitive disorder". If one of the diagnostic criteria applies, we recommend to visitvisiting a neuropsychologist/ memory clinic.

Up to three months
Depression
Time Frame: Up to one year
Depression is measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8).This scale encompasses eight questions, which can be answered with not at all (0), several days (1), more than half the days (2) and nearly every day (3). The score is the sum of the 8 items. The minimum score is 0 (best outcome) and the heights 24 (worse outcome).
Up to one year
Anxiety
Time Frame: Up to one year
Anxiety is measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7).The Assessment method has seven items; each can be answered with not at all (0), several days (1), more than half the days (2) and nearly every day (3). The score is the sum of all items. The minimum and maximum score are 0 (better outcome) and 21 (worse outcome) respectively.
Up to one year
Physical function
Time Frame: Up to one year
Physical health is measured by the sum scores of the following outcome measurement instruments: Timed Up-and-Go (TUG), Handgrip Strength, 2-Minute Walk Test (2-MWT), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).
Up to one year
Pain levels
Time Frame: Up to one year
Pain levels are measured by Numeric Rating Scale - Visualized (NRS-V), which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain/ worst pain imaginable).
Up to one year
Disability 1
Time Frame: Up to one year
Disability 1 is measured by Instrumental activities of daily living scale.This scale has 8 categories (ability to use telephone, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, mode of transportation, responsibility for own medications, ability to handle finances). Each has different levels of functioning with a score assigned. The patient circles the item that most closely describes its functional level. The lowest score is 0 (better outcome) and the highest is 8 (worse outcome).
Up to one year
Disability 2
Time Frame: Up to one year
Disability 2 is measured by Timed up and go test.
Up to one year
Disability 3
Time Frame: Up to one year
Disability 3 is measured by hand grip strength test
Up to one year
Anxiety-Score
Time Frame: Up to one year
Faces Anxiety Scale score
Up to one year
Sedation
Time Frame: Up to one year
Sedation is measured with the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS)
Up to one year
Person's level of consciousness
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a clinical scale used to reliably measure a person's level of consciousness after a brain injury. The GCS assesses a person based on their ability to perform eye movements, speak, and move their body. These three behaviors make up the three elements of the scale: eye, verbal, and motor. A person's GCS score can range from 3 (completely unresponsive) to 15 (responsive). This score is used to guide immediate medical care after a brain injury (such as a car accident) and also to monitor hospitalized patients and track their level of consciousness.

Lower GCS scores are correlated with higher risk of death.

The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Permanent medication
Time Frame: Up to one year
Medication at three months compared to baseline is assessed.
Up to one year
Frailty status
Time Frame: Up to one year
Frequency of frailty is measured by modified Fried criteria (category 1 +2 = pre-frail, category 3 -5 = frail)
Up to one year
Postoperative oral ingestion
Time Frame: The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Ingestion is measured by the amount of fluids and solid food.
The participants are followed up until the end of hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
Barthelindex
Time Frame: Up to one year

Score of the Barthel Index ranging from 0 to 100 were collected when 0 is the minimum (worst outcome) and 100 is the maximum (best outcome).

Score was reported as mean score of the Barthel Index.

Up to one year
Patient-related outcome measures (PROMS)
Time Frame: Up to one year
Different tools and questionnaires are combined to measure Patient-related outcome.
Up to one year
Patient-related experience measures (PREMS)
Time Frame: Up to one year
Patient-reported experiences of health care are measured with a questionnaire.
Up to one year
Therapy recommendations
Time Frame: Up to one year
Therapy recommendations are documented from patient records.
Up to one year
Survival
Time Frame: Up to one year
Up to one year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preoperative routine data
Time Frame: At baseline
Preoperative routine data are medical history, diagnoses, medication, etc.
At baseline
Patient-specific characteristics
Time Frame: At baseline
Patient-specific characteristics of patients with delirium
At baseline
Preoperative risk score for delirium
Time Frame: At baseline
Development of a risk model with different influencing factors of delirium
At baseline
Heart function
Time Frame: At baseline
Heart function is measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
At baseline
Preoperative sober times
Time Frame: At baseline
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Claudia Spies, MD, Prof., Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Delirium in Old Age

3
Subscribe