FUnctional diagnoSIs of corONary Stenosis (FUSION) (FUSION)

January 28, 2025 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

Validation of OCT-based FUnctional diagnoSIs of corONary Stenosis (FUSION)

The purpose of the FUSION study is to validate the diagnostic performance of Virtual Flow Reserve (VFR) by comparing it against a reference standard, fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center study collecting OCT pullback images of lesions pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and (optional) post-PCI procedure, and the corresponding pressure tracings and physiology indices. Up to 30 centers in the US will enroll approximately 310 patients. The expected duration of enrollment is approximately 15 months. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be approximately 27 months.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

312

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
        • Heart Center Research, LLC.
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258
        • HonorHealth
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72211
        • Arkansas Heart Hospital
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94604
        • VA Palo Alto Medical Center
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • UCLA Medical Center Santa Monica
    • Florida
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33308
        • Holy Cross Hospital
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32605
        • The Cardiac & Vascular Institute Research Foundation, LLC
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Tampa General Hospital
    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
        • Atlanta VA Medical Center
    • Illinois
      • Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
        • Loyola University Medical Center
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67214-3882
        • Via Christi Regional Medical Center - St. Francis Campus
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67226
        • Cardiovascular Research Institute of Kansas
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham & Women's Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States, 55433
        • Mercy Hospital
    • Montana
      • Missoula, Montana, United States, 59802
        • St. Patrick Hospital
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Division
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University Hospital
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center
      • Roslyn, New York, United States, 11576
        • St. Francis Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • VA Medical Center Durham
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97225
        • Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, United States, 17011
        • Holy Spirit Hospital
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605-5601
        • Greenville Health System
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 29303
        • Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
        • Austin Heart
      • Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555-0144
        • University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB)
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Memorial Hermann Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This clinical investigation will enroll male and female subjects from the general interventional cardiology population.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Patient provides written informed consent
  • Scheduled for clinically indicated coronary catheterization with the intent to perform physiologic assessment to guide physician clinical course (in lesions with visual % diameter stenosis 40-90%), if clinically indicated
  • Subject is undergoing invasive FFR with Adenosine (high-dose intra-coronary (IC) [200 μg for the left and or 100 μg for the right coronary artery] or 140 μg/kg/min for intravenous (IV)) used as hyperemic stimulus
  • Clinical presentation with or history of stable angina, unstable angina, or silent ischemia (defined as abnormal stress test or abnormal invasive physiology assessment) that has led to the procedure

General Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of myocardial infarction (MI) in the target vessel
  • Presence of acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
  • Culprit vessel of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)
  • TIMI flow < Grade 3 at baseline or visible thrombus
  • Prior history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
  • Prior heart transplant
  • Severe valvular heart disease or history of valve repair or replacement
  • Prior history of PCI with stent in target vessel, or target vessel involves in-stent restenosis.
  • Target coronary vessel is supplied by major collaterals or is supplying major collaterals to a CTO (chronic total occlusion)
  • CTO in the target vessel
  • Severe diffuse disease observed in target vessel defined as the presence of diffuse, serial gross luminal irregularities present in the majority of the coronary tree
  • Presence of myocardial bridge (MB), regardless of vessel location
  • Contraindication for FFR examination or administration of vasodilators
  • Known LVEF ≤45%
  • Target lesion involves Left Main coronary artery or ostial right coronary artery
  • Known renal insufficiency (eGFR < 30 ml/kg/m^2 or serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dL) unless patient is on dialysis
  • Heart Failure NYHA Class III or IV
  • Subject is pregnant (For a female subject of childbearing potential, a pregnancy test must be performed within 14 days (≤14 days) prior to the index procedure per site standard test)
  • Subject has or had active COVID-19 symptoms and/or a positive test result within the prior 2 months
  • Participation in another clinical study of an investigational drug or device
  • Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel

Imaging and Pressure Tracing Exclusion Criteria:

  • Artifact in pre-PCI OCT for the target lesion or in the event of multiple target lesions, artifact in pre-PCI OCT for ALL target lesions
  • Target lesion requires any preparation (including but not limited to balloon dilatation, atherectomy, etc.) prior to pre-PCI OCT and physiology measurement, or in case of multiple target lesions, ALL target lesions require-any preparation (including but not limited to balloon dilatation, atherectomy, etc.) prior to pre-PCI OCT and physiology measurement
  • Severe vessel tortuosity or calcification in the target vessel such that it is unlikely that the OCT catheter can be delivered
  • Target lesion not imaged by OCT or in the event of multiple target lesions, ALL target lesions not imaged by OCT
  • Pressure drift of > 0.03; i.e. Pd and Pa ratio value < 0.97 or > 1.03, unless physiology measurements are repeated after re-equalization
  • Target lesion or significant CAD beyond 60mm from coronary ostium; i.e. not able to clearly image and capture all disease segment with OCT in 1 run
  • Incorrectly done or unsuccessful catheter purge and/or contrast flush
  • Presence of plaque rupture and/or intravascular hematoma in target vessel (visual % diameter stenosis ≥ 40%)
  • Inability to receive intracoronary nitroglycerin prior to OCT or FFR
  • Use of flush media other than radiographic contrast

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Standard of Care: Angiography, OCT, FFR, and VFR
Patients will have Pre-OCT Angiography, OCT pullbacks, a FFR measurement and a VFR analysis
Patients will undergo a Pre-PCI Angiography
OCT pullback images will be collected pre-PCI and (optional) post-PCI procedure
FFR will be measured
VFR will be calculated offline using the OCT pullback images

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and Specificity of Virtual Flow Reserve (VFR) Against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure

Sensitivity and specificity of the VFR compared with FFR each of which will be tested against a prespecified performance goal. FFR with a binary cut-off of 0.80 will be used as the reference standard for comparison.

FFR or VFR value ≤ 0.80 will be considered positive (ischemia-causing), and FFR or VFR value > 0.80 will be considered negative (non-ischemia-causing).

Sensitivity is defined as the percentage of VFR positive lesions, in the group of FFR positive lesions.

Sensitivity=TP/(TP+FN) x 100%, where TP denotes the number of True Positives (both VFR and FFR positive) and FN denotes the number of False Negatives (VFR negative but FFR positive).

Specificity is defined as the percentage of VFR negative lesions in the group of FFR negative lesions.

Specificity=TN/(TN+FP) x 100%, where TN denotes the number of True Negatives (both VFR and FFR negatives) and FP denotes the number of False Positives (VFR positive but FFR negative).

Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Diagnostic Accuracy
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure

Overall diagnostic accuracy is defined as the proportion of correctly classified lesions among all lesions.

Overall Diagnostic Accuracy= (TP+TN)/(TP+TN+FP+FN) x 100%, where TP denotes the number of True Positives, FN denotes the number of False Negatives, TN denotes the number of True Negatives, and FN denotes the number of False Negatives.

Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure

PPV is defined as the proportion of lesions with the disease and with a positive test result among the group of lesions with a positive test result.

PPV= TP/(TP+FP) x 100%, where TP denotes the number of True Positives and FP denotes the number of False Positives.

NPV is defined as the proportion of lesions without the disease and with a negative test result among the group of lesions with negative test results.

NPV= TN/(TN+FN) x 100%, where TN denotes the number of True Negatives and FN denotes the number of False Negatives.

Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure
Correlation Between VFR and FFR
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure (post-procedure)
The correlation between VFR and FFR will be estimated as the R^2 correlation coefficient from the simple linear regression model using VFR value as the independent variable and FFR as the dependent variable.
Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure (post-procedure)
Area Under Curve (AUC) Against FFR
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure (post-procedure)
AUC will be estimated as the area under the ROC curve. ROC curve will be constructed using specificity on the x-axis and sensitivity on the y-axis. Sensitivity and specificity are calculated at various values of VFR and FFR, and the AUC curve will be drawn using logistic regression.
Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately post-procedure (post-procedure)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Allen Jeremias, MD, St. Francis Hospital,Roslyn,NY, United States

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on ICA (Invasive Coronary Angiography)

Subscribe