Breath Analysis as an Additional Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening to Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Colonoscopies (SCREENER)

January 3, 2023 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Breath analysiS as an Additional Test for ColoREctal cancEr screeNing to rEduce the Number of unnecessaRy Colonoscopies

In the past decade, the demand for colonoscopy procedures has increased significantly since the introduction of population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in many western countries. Post-polypectomy surveillance will increase the number of colonoscopy procedures conducted each year even further. The invasive nature of colonoscopy and the associated health-care costs warrant the development of a new non-invasive test to reduce the number of unnecessary colonoscopies.

These days, many countries use a non-invasive fecal test for CRC screening which is easy to perform at home, but test characteristics such as sensitivity and specificity are suboptimal. Multiple studies have already shown that volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis has a high diagnostic accuracy for CRC and Advanced Adenomas. An additional VOC analysis, for example through breath testing, in patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) may reduce the number of unnecessary colonoscopies.

The aim of this study is to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the AeonoseTM to distinguish patients with CRC from healthy controls, and to assess reproducibility of test results.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rationale: An electronic nose (eNose) is an artificial olfactory system that analyses volate organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. Exhaled human breath is mainly composed of inorganic compounds, inert gases and VOCs. VOCs are exhaled in very low concentrations and reflect pathological processes such as inflammation, oxidation, infection and neoplasms. The perspective is that metabolic and biochemical processes in several pathological situations cause different endogenous VOCs to arise, were they can serve as non-invasive biomarkers for certain diseases.

Primary objective: To evaluate if the use of an additional breath test (AeonoseTM) for patients with a positive FIT-test can reduce the number of unnecessary colonoscopies.

Secondary objectives:

  1. External validation of results for CRC and (advanced) adenoma detection established in a previous studies (second study not yet published). (15)
  2. To evaluate if VOC profiles in breath are similar at two different time points.
  3. Acceptance rate of using the AeonoseTM device for VOC analysis in participating patients.

Study population: Patients between the ages of 55 and 75 years old with a positive FIT-test referred for a colonoscopy procedure.

Estimated sample size: 750 participants

Intervention: Participants will be asked to breath through the AeonoseTM for 5 minutes during pre-colonoscopy intake and just prior to the procedure to assess reproducibility (with >2 weeks in between). There are no risks, nor benefits for the participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

750

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
        • Radboud University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients between the ages of 55 and 75 years referred for a colonoscopy procedure after a positive FIT test, according to the population based CRC screening program in the Netherlands

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior surgical resection of any portion of the colon
  • History of any type of malignancy, not including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC)
  • Current active colitis or history of polyposis syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Patients referred for colonoscopy
All participants will be asked to breathe into an electronic nose (eNose, the AeonoseTM, The eNose Company, Zutphen, the Netherlands) for 5 minutes during the pre-colonoscopy intake and just prior to the procedure to assess reproducibility (with >2 weeks in between).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing colorectal carcinoma from healthy controls
Time Frame: 12 months
The diagnostic accuracy, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, of the AeonoseTM in distinguishing between patients with and without CRC.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing advanced adenoma from healthy controls
Time Frame: 12 months
Sensitivity and specificity
12 months
Reproducibility
Time Frame: 12 months
The variation in VOC analysis results between two separate time points. The binary results from the eNose analysis will be presented in a scatterplot and a receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-curve). Cohen's kappa statistic will be applied to determine interobserver agreement between the eNose results of 2 different timepoints (>2 weeks apart)
12 months
Acceptance rate
Time Frame: 12 months
The acceptance rate of using the AeonoseTM in participating patients.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter D Siersema, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact [email protected]. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on AeonoseTM

Subscribe