Measuring Cognitive Enhancement During Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatments

April 21, 2020 updated by: Prof. Shay Efrati, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

The aim of the current study was to examine the effect of short-term HBOT (hyperbaric oxygen treatments) on a range of cognitive abilities. The current study examined whether there is a HBOT-related short-term cognitive improvement and, if so, what specific cognitive abilities are improved by the intervention.

Participants were randomized to perform cognitive tasks in one of two chambers with two different clinical environments: (a) HBOT condition: (2 ATA (atmosphere absolute) 100% oxygen for 90 minutes). (b) Control condition: in which the chamber was not pressurized (Normobaric condition- 1 ATA for 90 minutes).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the current study was to examine the effect of short-term HBOT on a range of cognitive abilities. The current study examined whether there is a HBOT-related short-term cognitive improvement and, if so, what specific cognitive abilities are improved by the intervention.

Participants were recruited through ads on the internet and on student social groups. All participants underwent a comprehensive physical and neurological examination, and general medical conditions were ruled out. Participants were excluded if reported changes in their cognitive or behavioral functions during one month prior to the beginning of the study. Smokers (people who smoke more than seven cigarettes a week) were required to take a lung x-ray confirming there isn't a pulmonary pathology, such as pneumothorax, pulmonary bullae, emphysema, or other lung pathologies preventing them from staying in a high ATA environment. Participants with an abnormal x-ray were excluded from the study. Participants who regularly use Methylphenidate (i.e. Ritalin) or other stimulants for attention disorders (i.e. ADHD) were instructed not to take it at the day of the experiment.

Following consent, all the participants were exposed to the testing battery in a group setting. One of the experimenters went through each of the sub-tests instructions in a detailed manner prior to a practice phase in which participants trained on the tasks. Afterwards, participants were randomized to perform the tasks in one of two chambers with two different clinical environments: (a) HBOT condition: (2 ATA 100% oxygen for 90 minutes). The atmospheric pressure in this condition was set to 2 ATA. This ATA level is known to have a clinical effect, whereas higher-pressure levels may result in inhibitory brain effects or even lead to focal toxicity (Efrati and Ben-Jacob, 2014). (b) Control condition: in which the chamber was not pressurized (Normobaric condition- 1 ATA for 90 minutes) and participants breathed air (21% oxygen). In this condition, ATA was elevated for a few minutes to 1.2 ATA in order to mimic the feeling of pressure building up in the ears. The pressure was decreased soon after to 1 ATA.

The assessment began 30 min after participants wore the oxygen masks within the chamber, in order to enable appropriate brain oxygenation in the HBOT condition (Vadas et al., 2017). The battery was composed of cognitive tests adapted for high functioning subjects and adjusted to an in-chamber group administration setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zerifin, Israel
        • Assaf Harofeh Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 20-40
  • intact sight / corrected sight
  • Hebrew as mother tongue
  • Intact comprehension

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active neurologic or psychiatric diagnosis.
  • If Had been treated with HBOT for any other reason prior to their inclusion;
  • Chest pathology ;
  • Inner ear disease;
  • Claustrophobia;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HBOT environment
Cognitive testing in 2ATA, 100% oxygen in breathing-masks
Subjects will enter the oxygen chamber. ATA will be elevated to 2 ATA. They will breath 100% oxygen while solving cognitive tests designed to assess their cognitive capacities
Sham Comparator: Control environment
Cognitive testing in 1ATA, air in breathing-masks
Subjects will enter the oxygen chamber. ATA will be elevated to 1.2 ATA for a short while and the decreased back to 1 ATA. They will breath air while solving cognitive tests designed to assess their cognitive capacities

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
memory
Time Frame: after 20 minutes of intervention
Number of words retrieved from a list
after 20 minutes of intervention
Working memory
Time Frame: after 20 minutes of intervention
accuracy rates on a working memory paradigm (n-back)
after 20 minutes of intervention
Divided attention
Time Frame: after 20 minutes of intervention
accuracy rates on a divided attention task (identifying visual and auditory targets)
after 20 minutes of intervention
Information processing speed
Time Frame: after 20 minutes of intervention
Accuracy rates on an information processing speed task (Symbol tracing task)
after 20 minutes of intervention
Response inhibition
Time Frame: after 20 minutes of intervention
Accuracy rates on a response inhibition task (stroop)
after 20 minutes of intervention
Problem solving
Time Frame: after 20 minutes of intervention
accuracy rates on a problem solving task (solving arithmetic series)
after 20 minutes of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Shay Efrati, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0031-17-ASF

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy

Clinical Trials on Hyperbaric oxygent treatment

3
Subscribe