Low-chlorine Vs High-chlorine Crystalloids in Septic Shock Adults

April 27, 2020 updated by: Jianfeng Xie, Southeast University, China

Effects of Low-chlorine Vs High-chlorine Crystalloid Solutions in Septic Shock Adults

Fluid resuscitation is an important treatment in septic shock patients, however whether crystalloid composition affects septic shock patients outcomes remains unclear. According to previous studies, low-chlorine crystalloids could significantly reduce the incidence of kidney injury and 30-day mortality compared with high-chlorine crystalloids in critically ill adults. Therefore, we hypothesized that the use of low-chlorine crystalloids would result in a lower incidence of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE 30: overall incidence of death, new renal-replacement therapy, and persistent renal dysfunction) than high-chlorine crystalloids in septic shock adults.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Jianfeng Xie, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 0086-13770332331
  • Email: xie820405@126.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years old <age ≤ 85 years old;
  2. Diagnosis of septic shock within 24 hours (sepsis 3.0);
  3. Needing fluid resuscitation judged by clinicians;
  4. The patient or the patient's legally acceptable representative signs the informed consent (signs within 24h of enrollment)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating period;
  2. Renal replacement therapy has been received or expected to receive within 6 hours;
  3. Those who were previously enrolled in the study;
  4. Estimated death within 24 hours;
  5. Other situations that not suitable for enrollment judged by researchers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection
  1. administration route and dosage:Intravenous infusion, 500~1000 ml/time. The dosage can be increased or decreased according to the age, weight and symptoms.
  2. rate: according to the the routine rate of fluid resuscitation of septic shock in the ICUs of Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University.
For each month of the trial, participating ICUs were assigned to use either Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection or 0.9% Saline for any intravenous administration of isotonic crystalloid. ICUs were randomly assigned to use Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection during even-numbered months and 0.9% Saline during odd-numbered months, or vice versa.
Active Comparator: 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection
  1. administration route and dosage:Intravenous infusion, 500~1000 ml/time. The dosage can be increased or decreased according to the age, weight and symptoms.
  2. rate: according to the the routine rate of fluid resuscitation of septic shock in the ICUs of Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University.
For each month of the trial, participating ICUs were assigned to use either Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection or 0.9% Saline for any intravenous administration of isotonic crystalloid. ICUs were randomly assigned to use Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection during even-numbered months and 0.9% Saline during odd-numbered months, or vice versa.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the composite of death and new receipt of renal-replacement therapy MAKE30
Time Frame: up to 30 days
overall incidence of death, new renal-replacement therapy, and persistent renal dysfunction within 30 days
up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection

3
Subscribe