Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Solution Versus Normal Saline for Early Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Sepsis

At present, people still have different opinions on choosing which kind of crystalloid solution for patients with sepsis, and there is no unified standard yet. It is necessary to conduct systematic studies on comparison of different fluid resuscitation methods on the efficacy and safety of crystalloid solution for patients with sepsis. Therefore, this study focuses on the efficacy and safety of sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution compared with normal saline.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sepsis and septic shock are clinical emergencies requiring immediate treatment and fluid resuscitation. Early effective fluid resuscitation can improve the prognosis of patients. So far, there is no perfect crystalloid solution. Normal saline is the most readily available and economical crystalline fluid for clinical resuscitation. It is isoosmotic and can meet the basic needs of patients in the early rehydration. But it lacks acid-base buffer system and potassium, calcium and magnesium ions, and the level of chloride ions is also significantly higher than that of plasma.

Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's solution contains physiological levels of Na+(130mmol/L), K+(4mmol/L), Ca2+(1.5mmol/L), Mg2+(1mmol/L), HCO3-(28mmol/L) and Cl-(109mmol/L). It also has citric acid/ sodium citrate buffer system (Citrate3-1.3mmol/L), pH7.3, and osmotic pressure 276mOsm/L. It is the most similar solution to extracellular fluid.

Theoretically,Compared with normal saline, Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's solution can maintain acid-base balance faster and better when restoring the microcirculation without affecting the level of chloride ion. Therefore we hypothesize that Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's solution can promote the body to restore to acid-base balance more quickly, and improve organ function more significantly than normal saline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
        • Contact:
          • Lina Zhang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed as sepsis or septic shock according to the definition of Sepsis-3.0 with fluid resuscitation requirement;
  • aged between 18 and 80, male or female;
  • Signed informed Consent (with delay within 24 hours).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hypermagnesemia;
  • Patients with hypothyroidism;
  • Patients predicted to die or discharged within 24 hours after admission;
  • Patients with previous history of mental illness, severe hepatic and renal insufficiency, severe cardiac disease, primary severe central nervous system lesions;
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women;
  • Patients who have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
  • Patients who participated in other clinical trials within 30 days;
  • Patients have other conditions that are not appropriate for inclusion according to the researcher's judgment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Solution
Intravenous drip, 500~1000ml per time. Infusion speed: 15ml/kg/h or according to guidelines or department routine.
This group was treated with Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Solution.
Other Names:
  • Bicarbonated Ringer's solution
Active Comparator: Normal Saline

Intravenous drip, 500~1000ml per time. Dosage depends on age、weight and symptoms.

Infusion speed: According to the department process or clinician's decision.

This group was treated with normal saline.
Other Names:
  • physiological saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA) value at 24h
Time Frame: 0 hours, 24 hours
ΔSOFA=SOFA24h-SOFA0h
0 hours, 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum lactate clearance rate
Time Frame: 0 hours, 6 hours
(Serum lactete0h-serum lactate6h)/serum lactate0h
0 hours, 6 hours
The proportion of patients with serum lactate clearance rate>30%
Time Frame: 0 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours
the proportion of patients whose serum lactate decrease by more than 30%
0 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours
Changes in pH value over time, and the lowest pH value during hospitalization
Time Frame: 0 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours
ΔpH=pH3h/6h/24h-pH0h, and the lowest pH value during hospitalization
0 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours
Changes in base residue (BE value) over time
Time Frame: 0 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours
ΔBE=BE3h/6h/24h-BE0h
0 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours
Changes in serum bicarbonate(HCO3-) over time
Time Frame: 0 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours
ΔHCO3-=HCO3-3h/6h/24h-HCO3-0h
0 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours
The proportion of patients with hyperchloremia
Time Frame: 0 hours, 3 hours, 24 hours
The proportion of patients with hyperchloremia at 3h and 24h.
0 hours, 3 hours, 24 hours
Changes in SOFA score over time
Time Frame: 0 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
ΔSOFA=SOFA24h/48h/72h-SOFA0h
0 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
Changes in APACHEII score over time
Time Frame: 0 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
ΔAPACHEII=APACHEII24h/48h/72h-APACHEII0h
0 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
Mechanical ventilation time(h)
Time Frame: Within 7 days
the length of mechanical ventilation time within 7 days
Within 7 days
The proportion of patients receiving RRT
Time Frame: Within 7 days
The proportion of patients receiving RRT within 7 days
Within 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lina Zhang, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis, Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Solution

Subscribe