The Effectiveness of Adhesive Versus Conventional Nasoalveolar Molding on Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

June 10, 2024 updated by: Ahmed Farghly Abdelnaeem Ahmed, Al-Azhar University

The Effectiveness of Adhesive Versus Conventional Nasoalveolar Molding on Alveolar Ridge, Nasal and Labial Growths in Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

The present study will compare the effectiveness of adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM) and conventional nasoalveolar molding on the alveolar ridge, nasal, and labial growth in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

objectives: -

  1. Evaluation of the anatomical position of the greater and lesser segments of the maxilla related to a stable midline anatomical point.
  2. Evaluation of the nasal symmetry.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

cleft lip and palate can manifest as an independent anomaly, be associated with a syndrome, or present as a complex condition. Unilateral clefts are notably more common, occurring nine times more frequently than bilateral clefts. Additionally, it predominantly affects males, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. Common clinical features in unilateral cleft lip and palate cases involve structural changes in the nose, lip, palate, and alveolar arch. Peri-oral tissues lack continuity, and on the affected side of the nose, you can observe wider nostrils and a downward-pointing alar rim. Additionally, the columella and nasal tip shift towards the unaffected or normal side, accompanied by the displacement of the maxillary alveolar segments towards the lateral side.

Conventional treatment for cleft lip and palate historically comprised numerous surgical procedures, including secondary revisions and alveolar bone grafting. However, even with these multiple interventions, concerns persisted regarding suboptimal aesthetics. Therefore, the pursuit of non-surgical treatment options that can mitigate the severity of this deformity during early life is greatly desirable. The introduction of the presurgical Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) procedure has offered an alternative, allowing for the avoidance of traditional secondary surgeries while achieving improved outcomes. . These interventions should be initiated within the narrow time frame from birth to four months, as estrogen levels decrease within the first four months after birth, making this period optimal for tissue manipulation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 4050113
        • Faculty of Dental Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Adel F Hassan, Phd
      • Cairo, Egypt, 4450113
        • Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys, Cairo), Al- Azhar University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 1- 8 weeks.
  • Gender: male and female.
  • Patients with a unilateral cleft alveolus and lip.
  • No developmental syndromes or atypical cleft pathology in medical history.
  • No previous history of unilateral CLP correction.
  • Motivated parents toward the treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a bilateral cleft alveolus and lip
  • Syndromic patient
  • Uncooperative caregiver

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM)
3D (3 dimensional ) printed conventional NAM in thickness of 2 mm. The cleft area will be blocked in software, and NAM will be fabricated using a 3D (3 dimensional ) printer. Soft acrylic resin will be added to make pressure area and reduction in opposing for relief. The appliance will be evaluated and adjusted monthly. A nasal stent will be fabricated when the cleft is 5mm
compare the effectiveness of adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM) and conventional nasoalveolar molding on the alveolar ridge, nasal, and labial growth in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate
Other Names:
  • NAM
Experimental: Conventional nasoalveolar molding
(positive control group) comprises 10 cases of unilateral cleft lip and palate that will be scheduled for construction of 3D (3 dimensional ) printed conventional NAM in thickness of 2 mm. The cleft area will be blocked in software, and NAM will be fabricated using a 3D printer. Soft acrylic resin will be added to make pressure area and reduction in opposing for relief. The appliance will be evaluated and adjusted monthly. A nasal stent will be fabricated when the cleft is 5mm
compare the effectiveness of adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM) and conventional nasoalveolar molding on the alveolar ridge, nasal, and labial growth in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate
Other Names:
  • NAM
No Intervention: normal children
normal children which will be compared with groups 1 and 2 for results evaluation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Posterior ends of alveolar crest
Time Frame: 3 months
width between the most posterior ends of the alveolar crest in the greater segment and lesser segment
3 months
Middle ends of alveolar crest
Time Frame: 3 months
width between the middle parts of the cleft palate (The intersection points between the palatally extended buccal frenum sulcus line and the palatal gingival groove in the greater and lesser segment
3 months
Anterior ends of alveolar crest
Time Frame: 3 months
The widths of the cleft gap (The anterior endpoint of the alveolar crest in the greater and lesser segment)
3 months
Mid line of maxilla
Time Frame: 3 months
Inc-Sagittal: - Perpendicular distance from Inc point (The intersection points between the labial frenum-incisive papilla point line and the alveolar crest of the premaxilla in the greater segment) to sagittal line (The perpendicular line to the PG-PL line)
3 months
Angulation of maxilla
Time Frame: 3 months
Mid-Inc)-Sagittal: - Angle among Inc point, midpoint in PG -PL, and sagittal line
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alar base width
Time Frame: 3 months
Total width correction of alar base width.
3 months
Columella length.
Time Frame: 3 months
Columella length correction
3 months
Columella angle deviation.
Time Frame: 3 months
Columella angle deviation correction
3 months
Nostril height and width on the cleft side.
Time Frame: 3 months
Nostril height and width on the cleft side correction
3 months
Nostril height and width on the non-cleft side
Time Frame: 3 months
Nostril height and width on the non-cleft side correction
3 months
Nasal ridge deviation.
Time Frame: 3 months
Nasal ridge deviation correction
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Adel F Hassan, Phd, Fucalty of dental medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

all IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

4 months

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

all IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cleft Lip and Palate

Clinical Trials on Nasoalveolar molding in unilateral cleft lip and palate

Subscribe