Comparison of Two Doses of Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients (X-Covid 19)

June 7, 2021 updated by: Niguarda Hospital

Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: Comparison of 40 mg o.d. Versus 40 mg b.i.d. A Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a higher dose of low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin 40 mg b.i.d.) is superior than the standard prophylaxis dose (enoxaparin 40 mg o.d.) in reducing thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19 ), which is caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, are apparently at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), as a consequence of activation of the hemostatic system which, in the most severe cases, can also be associated with the formation of microthrombi and clinically relevant disseminated intravascular coagulation. Concerns about the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis with standard doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been raised. Therefore, LMWH at higher doses than those recommended for thromboprophylaxis is used in some hospitals, although no evidence exists yet of higher efficacy of high doses compared to standard prophylactic doses. This practice might as well increase the risk of major bleeding. The investigators designed a randomized trial comparing standard prophylactic dose of subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg o.d.) with higher dose (40 mg b.i.d) with the aim of testing whether high-dose thromboprophylaxis is more effective than standard dose in preventing VTE in COVID-19 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

189

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milano, Italy, 20162
        • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All-comers patients aged >=18 years and admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted directly to an intensive care unit;
  • Estimated creatinine clearance <15 ml/min/1.73m2;
  • Patients needing anticoagulant for prior indication;
  • Participants involved in other clinical trials;
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 40 mg subcutaneous enoxaparin o.d.
Effects of 40 mg subcutaneous enoxaparin o.d.
Subcutaneous enoxaparin
Active Comparator: 40 mg subcutaneous enoxaparin b.i.d
Effects of 40 mg subcutaneous enoxaparin b.i.d
Subcutaneous enoxaparin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of venous thromboembolism detected by imaging
Time Frame: 30 days
Deep vein thrombosis events diagnosed by serial compression ultrasonography and pulmonary embolism events diagnosed by computed tomography scan
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In hospital major complications
Time Frame: 30 days
death, venous thromboembolism, use of mechanical ventilation, stroke, acute myocardial infarction and admission to an intensive care
30 days
Number of deep venous thrombosis events
Time Frame: 30 days
Deep venous thrombosis events diagnosed by serial compression ultrasonography
30 days
Sequential organ failure assessment
Time Frame: 30 days

Maximum sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score comparison between the two groups.

The SOFA score ranges from 0 to 24. Higher SOFA score is associated with a greater risk of death or prolonged intensive care unit stay.

30 days
C-reactive protein
Time Frame: 30 days
To compare C-reactive protein levels as % above the upper reference limit [URL]) among the two groups.
30 days
Interleukin-6
Time Frame: 30 days
To compare Interleukin-6 levels as % above the upper reference limit [URL]) among the two groups.
30 days
D-dimer
Time Frame: 30 days
To D-dimer compare levels as % above the upper reference limit [URL]) among the two groups.
30 days
hs-troponin levels
Time Frame: 30 days
To compare hs-troponin levels as % above the upper reference limit [URL]) among the two groups.
30 days
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Time Frame: 30 days
To compare the incidence of SARS-CoV-2-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) between the two groups.
30 days
Hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days
To compare length of hospital stay between the two groups.
30 days
Right ventricular function
Time Frame: 30 days
To compare measures of right ventricular function at trans-thoracic echocardiography or CT between admission and follow-up, whenever available
30 days
Number of pulmonary embolism events
Time Frame: 30 days
Pulmonary embolism events diagnosed by computed tomography scan
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Enoxaparin

Subscribe