Could Peri-anal Block be Effective as Caudal Block in Trans-anal Pull-through Surgery ??.

August 18, 2021 updated by: Mohamed Salah Rashed Abd Elraheem, Assiut University

Could Peri-anal Block be Effective as Caudal Block in Trans-anal Pull-through Surgery for Children With Hirschsprung Disease??. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IN pediatric patient population pain is considered one of the most misunderstood; under diagnosed and under treated medical problems. If left uncontrolled, pain may have a diverse effect on all aspects of life as it is only a sensory perception but also has emotional, cognitive and behavioral components.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Caudal anesthesia is one of the most commonly used regional anesthetic and analgesic technique in pediatric patient as it is an easy safe and reliable method that can be performed for both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in patient undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgery. It can be used for upper abdominal surgery by increasing the volume of local anesthetic injected or through advancing a catheter.

Caudal anesthesia is a common practice given along with general anesthesia to decrease intraoperative inhalational anesthesia requirements, postoperative pain and emergence agitation.

So many patients are complaining from ano-rectal pathologies, these diseases are common in both sexes and all age groups. The spectrum of anorectal disorders ranges from benign and irritating (pruritus- ani) to potentially life-threatening (anorectal cancer) and the surgical intervention is performed mostly under general or regional anesthesia.

While general and regional anesthetics provide reliable anesthesia, they are often associated with nausea,vomiting, urinary retention and motor blockade of lower limbs. Moreover, repeated spinal or epidural punctures performed by inexperienced anesthesiologists often cause delays in the tight schedule of operations.

Several reports have described various forms of local anesthetic infiltration for ano- rectal surgery , hemorrhoidectomy,anal fistula or fissure surgeries or lateral sphincterotomy. Local peri-anal infiltration is a simple procedure that can be easily learned and performed by surgeon and this method allows the operation to begin almost immediately.

There are different types of local anesthesia like infiltration, nerve block, ring block field block. Considering anorectal surgeries, nerve bock mainly pudendal nerve along with infiltration anesthesia is used worldwide. Perianal block by local anesthetic infiltration is safe simple and effective for various anal operations with very high degree of acceptance and satisfaction among patients .it had been found to be associated with low pain score and postoperative complications and faster return to daily social activity.

Although there are studies on the use of caudal block and local infiltration of anesthetic agent for the surgical resolution of anorectal pathologies, there is no established protocol for comparing efficacy, postoperative pain, and satisfaction among pediatrics patient undergoing trans-anal pull through in congenital megacolon (Hirschsprung's disease).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Fatma Nabil, Professor
  • Phone Number: 01003633992

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of both sexes.
  • Patients with age range 3 to 10 years old.
  • Patients with ASA 1 , 2 classification.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient or parents refusal.
  • Allergy to the study drugs.
  • Suspect coagulopathy.
  • Local infection at site of intervention.
  • History of developmental delay.
  • Neuromuscular disorders.
  • Skeletal deformity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Peri-anal local anaesthetic infiltration
Patients in this group will receive the prepared anesthetic mixture (bupivacaine 0.25% in dose of 1ml\kg plus dexametomidine 2ug\kg diluted in 0.5ml of normal saline) in a syringe will be connected to 22_ gauge short, beveled needle. The technique of the block will be done guided by Nystrom et al.
postoperative pain relieve, among pediatrics patient
Active Comparator: caudal anaesthesia
Patients in this group will receive caudal block using 22_gauge short, beveled cannula or needle, The prepared anesthetic mixture (bupivacaine 0.25% in dose of 1ml\kg plus dexametomidine 2ug\kg diluted in 0.5ml of normal saline).
Regional anaesthesia for postoperative pain relieve, among pediatrics patient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative pain relieve
Time Frame: 24 hours
Assessment of postoperative pain using FLACC scale and the time to first analgesia request.
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ramsay's sedation scale
Time Frame: 24 hours
Assessment of postoperative sedation using (Ramsay's sedation scale).
24 hours
Postoperative motor power
Time Frame: 24 hours
Assessment of postoperative motor power.
24 hours
Postoperative Complication
Time Frame: 24 hours
Assessment of postoperative Complication (nausea, vomiting, bradycardia with heart rate< 80 or hypotension as systolic blood pressure< {70+age in year *2}).
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Peri-anal local anaesthetic infiltration

Subscribe