Effect of Hearing Loss and Vestibular Decline on Cognitive Function in Older Subjects (GECkO)

May 11, 2020 updated by: Ethisch Comité, UZA, University Hospital, Antwerp

Effect of Hearing Loss and Vestibular Decline on Cognitive Function in Older Subjects: Correlation With Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials and MRI Brain Volume Changes

The world population has been growing and aging dramatically, with a rising prevalence of dementia. Worldwide, around 50 million people have dementia, with 10 million new cases added every year. Despite the epidemic scale of dementia, until now no cure or disease-modifying therapy has been identified. Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recognized dementia as a public health priority. Several large studies have demonstrated that hearing impairment is associated with a greater risk of cognitive impairment. Hearing rehabilitation could potentially provide a disease-modifying therapy to delay cognitive decline. Although auditory behavioral research has not yet revealed a reliable indicator of early cognitive impairment, cortical-evoked auditory potentials (CAEP) have shown promising evidence as a non-invasive way to identify early-stage cognitive impairment.

The peripheral vestibular apparatus is located in the inner ear and codes rotation and translation of the head to preserve a stable view. Increasing evidence suggests that bilateral vestibular function loss, also known as bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP), leads to hippocampal atrophy and reduced spatial cognitive skills, as well as structural and functional alterations in parieto-insular and parieto-temporal regions. Many studies have demonstrated that vestibular function declines with age. Vestibular dysfunction can be linked to reduced topographical orientation and memory and has been suggested as a risk factor to AD, due to increased risk of falling and deficits in activities of daily life (ADL).

Our first aim is to study the effect of SNHL and vestibular decline on CAEP, spatial and non-spatial cognitive functioning and trajectories in cognitively healthy older subjects, as well as patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD. Our second aim is to study if MRI brain volume changes can be observed in the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and auditory and vestibular key regions in these populations and correlate with CAEP and cognitive functioning.

The expected outcome is important to society because it will provide data from a cognitive assessment protocol adapted for a potentially hearing-impaired population, objective outcome measures (incl. CAEP and MRI brain volume changes) to identify older subjects with SNHL and BVP at risk for cognitive decline, and will support screening and interventional studies to assess the impact of rehabilitation on slowing down cognitive decline.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Vincent Van Rompaey, professor
  • Phone Number: +32 3821 4244
  • Email: nko@uza.be

Study Locations

    • Antwerp
      • Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium, 2650
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Antwerp
        • Contact:
          • Vincent Van Rompaey, professor
          • Phone Number: +32 3821 4244
          • Email: nko@uza.be

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mini Mental State Examination > 12
  • Dutch-speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncorrectable visual impairment
  • Hearing implants
  • Hearing aids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Healthy controls
Age-matched controls with normal hearing or mild sensorineural hearing loss: 40 decibel or less in better hearing ear, and normal vestibular function
Longitudinal hearing, vestibular and cognitive follow-up
Other: Moderate Sensorineural hearing loss
Moderate Sensorineural hearing loss: 41-60 decibel in the better hearing ear
Longitudinal hearing, vestibular and cognitive follow-up
Other: Severe Sensorineural hearing loss
Severe Sensorineural hearing loss: 61-80 decibel in the better hearing ear
Longitudinal hearing, vestibular and cognitive follow-up
Other: Bilateral Vestibulopathy
Bilateral vestibulopathy: half with normal hearing, half with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss
Longitudinal hearing, vestibular and cognitive follow-up
Other: Mild Cognitive Impairment
Longitudinal hearing, vestibular and cognitive follow-up
Other: Alzheimer's Disease
Longitudinal hearing, vestibular and cognitive follow-up

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing Impaired Individuals total score
Time Frame: Longitudinal follow-up for 24 months
Cognitive test adapted for hearing impaired subjects, minimum score is 200, maximum score is 800, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
Longitudinal follow-up for 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Longitudinal follow-up

3
Subscribe