Time Restricted Eating Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis (TREO_MS)

March 25, 2024 updated by: Brooks C. Wingo, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham
The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the preliminary efficacy, safety, and acceptability of time restricted feeding (TRF) among a sample of 12 adults with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). The specific aims of this study are: 1: To determine preliminary efficacy of TRF for reducing symptom burden, improving inflammatory markers, and reducing cardiometabolic risk among adults with RRMS. 2: To determine the safety and participant acceptability of TRF. Participants will be asked to consume all food during an 8-hour window each day and not eat for the remaining 16 hours. All participants will follow this eating pattern for 8 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by demyelination and loss of axons in the central nervous system. Over the last decade there has been an influx of evidence demonstrating the impact of lifestyle risk factors on the progression of MS symptoms. Specifically, epidemiological studies report that poor diet is associated with increased risk of disability in adults with MS. Despite this evidence, little research has explored dietary interventions that may reduce symptom burden of MS. One dietary intervention that has shown particular promise in animal models of MS is intermittent fasting (IF), which is a dietary pattern characterized by cycles of eating and extended fasting. There are a number of protocols for IF, including time restricted feeding (TRF), in which all food is consumed during a limited window of time each day. Growing evidence demonstrates that IF reduces inflammation, improves immune function, and improves cardiometabolic risk in animal models of MS, however, little of this research has been translated into human trials. In addition to these physiological benefits, the investigators believe that TRF will provide a behavioral benefit, as it addresses barriers traditionally seen in dietary interventions by shifting the focus from restricting what participants eat, to focusing on meal timing.

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the preliminary efficacy, safety, and acceptability of TRF in adults with MS. The specific aims of this study are: 1: To determine preliminary efficacy of TRF for reducing symptom burden, improving inflammatory markers, and reducing cardiometabolic risk among adults with RRMS. 2: To determine the safety and participant acceptability of TRF.

Twelve adults with relapsing-remitting MS will eat all meals within an 8 hour period each day. All participants will follow the assigned meal plan for 8 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS)
  • BMI between 18-50 kg.m2
  • If on disease-modifying medications, stable for 6 months
  • If not on disease-modifying medication, no medication usage within previous 6 months
  • Able to walk 25 ft. with or without assistance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Relapse within previous 30 days
  • Actively engaged in a weight loss program or unwilling to follow assigned dietary timing pattern
  • Regularly fasts >15 hours/day
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Current use of insulin or sulfonylurea agents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Time Restricted Feeding
Participants will be asked to follow a time-restricted meal pattern (8:16 protocol)
Participants will eat all food within an 8 hour window each day. They will only consume water or black coffee during the remaining 16 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed 25-foot Walk Speed
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in timed 25-foot walk test speed between baseline and 8 weeks. Speed calculated as ft per second, and change calculated as speed at baseline - speed at 8 weeks. Higher score indicates better outcome. There are no minimum or maximum values, as this is the measure of the time it takes a participant to walk 25 feet. Higher score indicates higher speed, which is preferable.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
15-item questionnaire requiring respondent to rate types of pain as mild, moderate or severe. Scores range from 0-45, with higher pain intensity indicated by higher score. Change calculated as SFMPQ score at basline - SFMPQ score at 8 weeks.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
21-item questionnaire with possible score ranging from 0-84. Higher scores indicate higher impact of fatigue on a person's life. Change in MFIS was calculated as MFIS score at baseline - MFIS score at 8 weeks.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
9-item questionnaire in respondents rate each statement from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Total scores range from 9- 63, with higher score indicating higher fatigue severity. Change in FSS calculated as FSS at baseline - FSS at 8 weeks.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
19 self-rated items that produce 7 component scores and 1 global score. Only global scores were calculated for this study. Global scores can range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. Change in PSQI calculated as PSQI at baseline - PSQI at 8 weeks.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Percent Lean Mass
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Lean mass as a percent of total body mass, measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
9 Hole Peg Test Speed
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Higher score indicates better outcome. Speed on 9 hole peg test was measured as pegs per second, and change in speed was calculated as speed at baseline - speed at 8 weeks. There are no minimum or maximum values, as the measure is time that it takes a person to complete the test. Higher score indicates faster speed, which is preferable.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
The score is the number of symbols identified correctly in 90 seconds. Potential scores range from 0-110. Higher score indicate improved outcome. Change in score on the SDMT calculated as SDMT score at baseline- SDMT score at 8 weeks.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Percent Fat Mass
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in fat mass as percentage of total body mass, measured by DXA. Calculated as percent fat mass at baseline- percent fat mass at 8 weeks.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brooks C Wingo, PhD, Univeristy of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Time Restricted Feeding

Subscribe