Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation During COVID-19 Outbreak

February 18, 2022 updated by: Irene Giovanna Aprile, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation in Stroke Survivors Using a Portable Device During the COVID-19 Outbreak. A Feasibility Study

The COVID-19 outbreak requires a rapid re-shaping of the entire organization of the rehabilitation services. This includes the design and planning of appropriate rehabilitation settings, intervention and logistics for organizing space for patients.

The aims of this study are: (a) to evaluate the feasibility of the bedside use of a novel rehabilitation device for upper limb in patients with stroke; (b) to evaluate the motor and cognitive outcomes of the treatment; (c) to validate the instrumental outcomes provided by the device.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study aims to:

  1. evaluate the feasibility of the bedside use of a novel portable rehabilitation device for upper limb in patients with stroke in an inpatient setting;
  2. assess motor and cognitive outcomes of the treatment;
  3. validate the instrumental outcomes provided by the device.

Forty subacute stroke patients with upper limb hemiplegia will be enrolled. Patients' upper limb will be treated with a novel portable robotic device (Icone, Heaxel). The robot will be transferred to each patient's room, where the rehabilitation session will be performed, thanks to the portability of the device. During the treatment, patients will execute "exergames" involving elbow flexion-extension, shoulder protraction-retraction, internal-external rotation, flexion-extension and abduction-adduction. The exercises will be selected among the available ones to train both motor and cognitive functions. The rehabilitation intervention will include 30 rehabilitation sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, three to five times a week. In addition to the upper limb treatment, patients will receive a rehabilitation treatment for the lower limbs.

For Aim 1, the usability and the acceptability of the device and the satisfaction with the treatment will be evaluated at the end of the rehabilitation intervention by means of the System Usability Scale (SUS), the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and the Likert scale, respectively.

For Aim 2, the clinical effect of the treatment with the robot will be investigated by means of the following scales, assessed both at baseline and at discharge: the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity (FMA-UE), the Motricity Index (MI), the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), the Modified Barthel Index (mBI), the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

For Aim 3, at baseline, each patient will perform the kinematic and kinetic assessment provided by the robot twice, one day apart, to assess the reliability of the kinematic parameters provided by the robot; moreover, the kinematic and kinetics assessment will be performed every ten rehabilitation sessions, to analyze the responsiveness of the kinematic parameters and possible "plateau" in the recovery process.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rome, Italy, 00168
        • Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (verified by MRI or CT);
  • time latency within 6 months from stroke (subacute patients);
  • age between 35-85 years;
  • cognitive abilities adequate to understand the experiments and the follow instructions
  • upper limb impairment (FMA-UE score ≤58);
  • ability to give written consent;
  • compliance with the study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of recurrent stroke;
  • inability to understand the instructions required for the study;
  • fixed contractions in the affected limb (ankylosis, Modified Ashworth Scale equal to 4);
  • severe deficits in visual acuity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robotic therapy
Upper limb robotic rehabilitation by means of the portable robot Icone.
The treatment with the robot Icone will include 30 sessions, each session lasting 45 minutes, with a frequency from three to five times a week. The treatment will be provided in the patient's room. Patients will execute upper limb movement involving elbow flexion-extension, shoulder protraction-retraction, internal-external rotation, flexion-extension, and abduction-adduction. Visual and auditory feedback will be provided during the tasks. The exercises will train both motor and cognitive functions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: After 30 rehabilitation sessions
It is a tool for measuring the usability
After 30 rehabilitation sessions
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Time Frame: After 30 rehabilitation sessions
It is a tool for measuring the acceptability.
After 30 rehabilitation sessions
Likert Scale
Time Frame: After 30 rehabilitation sessions
It is a tool for measuring the satisfaction.
After 30 rehabilitation sessions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE)
Time Frame: At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. It is applied clinically and in research to determine disease severity, describe motor recovery, and to plan and assess treatment.
At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
Motricity Index for the upper extremity (MI-UE)
Time Frame: At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
It is a clinical instrument for characterizing the strength of the paretic upper extremity following stroke.
At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: At baseline; after 30 session rehabilitation sessions
It is a clinical instrument for characterizing upper limb spasticity. Shoulder, elbow and wrist spasticity will be assessed.
At baseline; after 30 session rehabilitation sessions
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
It is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults.
At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
Modified Barthel Index (mBI)
Time Frame: At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
It is a measure of independence in activities of daily living.
At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
It is a widely used screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment.
At baseline; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
Kinematic parameters
Time Frame: At baseline (twice, one day apart); after 10 rehabilitation sessions; after 20 rehabilitation sessions; after 30 rehabilitation sessions
The kinematics of the end-effector of the robot will be acquired during point-to-point tasks.
At baseline (twice, one day apart); after 10 rehabilitation sessions; after 20 rehabilitation sessions; after 30 rehabilitation sessions

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 18, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Robotic therapy

3
Subscribe