The Effect of Task-oriented EMG-triggered ES on Upper Limb Motor Function in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

March 7, 2024 updated by: nihal tezel

The Effect of Task-oriented Electromyography-triggered Electrical Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Function in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

The purpose of our study; to investigate the effects of EMG-induced ES treatment on hand functions, muscle strength, and quality of life in patients with hemiplegic CP.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Upper limb spasticity greatly affects the hand functions of patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and impairs quality of life. The most important goal in rehabilitation; despite the existing deficiencies, the highest level of functional independence of the patient is to increase the quality of life. EMG-triggered biofeedback electrical stimulation (EMG-triggered-BF-ES) increases the patient's active participation and motivation in rehabilitation, creates visual or auditory BF, provides muscle reeducation, decreases spasticity, prevents atrophies and increases joint mobility and increases muscle functionality by increasing the patient's functionality. There are areas of use the EMG-triggered-BF-ES such as cerebrovascular disease (CVO), spinal cord injury, and CP. When the literature is examined; studies were found to be few, and no study evaluating the upper extremity was found in children with CP. The purpose of our study is the investigation of the effects of EMG-triggered-BF-ES treatment applied on hand functions, muscle strength, and quality of life in patients with CP.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06010
        • DiskapiYBERH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

primary care clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having a diagnosis of CP
  • age between 4 and 18 year
  • at least 10° of the active wrist and finger extension in the affected limb but less than normal
  • upper limb spasticity (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers) less than or equal to grade 2 according to the modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
  • should be able to receive command

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mental retardation
  • Passive range of motion (ROM) limitation in the upper extremity
  • Sensory impairment in the upper extremity
  • The visual and auditory deficit in the upper extremity
  • MAS is more than 3.
  • Botulinum toxin application to the upper limb in the last 6 months
  • Any surgical application to the upper limb in the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
experimental and control groups

Task-oriented EMG-triggered ES treatment will be applied to the experimental group 2 days a week for 5 weeks and will continue with conventional physiotherapy.

The control group will only continue conventional physiotherapy treatment.

All treatments were planned as 2 sessions per week, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. For EMG-trigger-ES application, dual-channel Nu-Tek® brand, Maxi plus 2 Model EMG-trigger-BF-ES Device in our clinic was planned to be used. With EMG-triggered-ES application, while the patient is in a sitting position, shoulder adduction, and the elbow is 90 degrees of flexion and pronation, the patient will extend to the ball of 5 cm in diameter, which is placed as far as the distance between the acromion and the 3rd toe, and then the finger-wrist active extension will be stimulated and then It was planned to apply the ball to be grasped. One of the two 5x5 cm superficial square electrodes of the device was planned to be placed on the extensor carpi radialis and extensor digitorum Communis and the other 2 cm distal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CPQoL)
Time Frame: within 3 months
Health condition-specific questionnaire designed for measuring QOL in children with cerebral palsy (CP). It consists of a caregiver and a child survey. It is used for the evaluation of Sp cases between the ages of 4-12.
within 3 months
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: within 3 months
The ARAT consists of four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. It contains 19 tasks, and each task is scored on a four-point scale (0, can perform no part of the test; 1, performs test partially; 2, completes test but takes abnormally long time or has great difficulty; and 3, performs test normally).
within 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
nine hole peg test (9-HPT)
Time Frame: at the beginning, at the 5th week, and at the 3rd-month visit.
9-HPT test is a standardized,quantitative assesment used to measure finger dexterity.
at the beginning, at the 5th week, and at the 3rd-month visit.
hydraulic hand dynamometer
Time Frame: at the beginning, at the 5th week, and at the 3rd-month visit.
Patients were encouraged to press as firmly as possible. Three consecutive measurements were performed. The average of the measurements was recorded in kilogram (kg).
at the beginning, at the 5th week, and at the 3rd-month visit.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy, Spastic

Clinical Trials on electromyography-triggered electrical stimulation

Subscribe