Irreversible Electroporation of Unresectable Liver Tumors

Irreversible Electroporation of Unresectable Liver Tumors - a Phase I Study of Safety and Feasibility

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of curative intended irreversible electroporation (IRE) in the treatment of liver tumors neighboring major vessels or bile ducts.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients can be included in the study if they have one or more malignant liver tumors unsuitable for resection and thermal ablation (due to proximity of major vessels or bile duct) or other established liver directed therapies.

Prior to inclusion all potential participant will be evaluated by the local multidisciplinary team, to insure fulfillment of the above-mentioned criteria. In general, the included patient will have tumors with <1 cm of margin to major hepatic vessels or bile ducts, thereby not allowing for conventional treatments because of risk of i.e. hemorrhage, biliary tract damage, liver failure or ineffective ablation due to heat sink.

IRE will be done under general anesthesia as an in-patient procedure. Patients will be observed for at least 24 hours after IRE.

Patients will attend CT scans 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-IRE according to national guidelines (for follow-up after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)). Patients will attend the out-patient clinic after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. During the follow-up period, patients will be asked to fill out electronic forms monitoring pain, quality of life and nutritional status. After 24 months the patients will only be followed with CT scans in accordance with the mentioned schedule. Data collection for scientific purposes will stop when the last included patient has been followed for at least 24 months or when the study period concludes.

In case of multiple liver tumors, where a conventional treatment approach is not possible due to a single lesion being too close to major vessels or bile ducts, IRE may be used in conjunction to conventional therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary or secondary cancer of the liver.
  • Largest tumor diameter ≤5 cm in any plane.
  • Tumor must be deemed as unresectable and unsuitable for other established curative liver directed therapies.
  • Treatment must be given with curative intent.
  • Patients must be able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Radiological signs of synchronous intra- or extrahepatic disease, unless curative intended therapy is planned.
  • Tumor is inaccessible e.g. due to venous dilation etc. (assessed with preoperative ultrasound)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >3
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2
  • Child-Pugh class C
  • International Normalized Ratio (INR)>1.5
  • Pregnancy
  • Persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Implanted electronic devices e.g. cardiac pacemakers or other electrostimulators.
  • Metal stents or other metallic objects near the ablation zone (unless the stent can be replaced with a plastic stent prior to IRE)
  • Severe allergies to anesthetic agent, paralytic agent or any of the equipment used during treatment.
  • Patient is referred from a hospital outside of Denmark

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Selected patients who choose to participate will undergo ablation of the target lesion using irreversible electroporation.
The IRE procedure will be carried out as ultrasound guided technique either percutaneously or during laparotomy. Needle spacing and electrical pulse delivery will be performed in a standardized way.
Other Names:
  • NanoKnife(TM)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day complication rate and severity
Time Frame: 90 days after intervention (last patient)
Adverse events will be registered and scaled according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
90 days after intervention (last patient)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success rate
Time Frame: 90 days after intervention (last patient)
The rate of patients were it is possible to place needles according to the treatment plan and deliver 90 electrical pulses per electrode pair
90 days after intervention (last patient)
Technical efficacy rate (1 month) (according to SIR)
Time Frame: 90 days after intervention (last patient)
The rate of patients showing no residual tumor on contrast enhanced computed tomography (ceCT)
90 days after intervention (last patient)
Median local progression free survival from IRE
Time Frame: 2 years after intervention (last patient)
The median time from the intervention to progressive disease of the treated lesion, according to RECIST 1.1 or modified RECIST (mRECIST) (only for HCC).
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Median overall survival (OS) from IRE
Time Frame: 2 years after intervention (last patient)
The median time from the intervention to death.
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Longitudinal changes in perceived quality of life
Time Frame: 2 years after intervention (last patient)
Quality of life questionnaire - Core 30 is used to assess the quality of life in the included patients. Raw scores will be calculated according to the manual. Items will be grouped in: Global health status (range 0 - 100, high is good), Functional scales (range 0 - 100, high is good) and symptom scales (range 0 - 100 low is good). Differences in each scales during the course of the trial will be calculated separately.
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Longitudinal changes in pain perception
Time Frame: 2 years after intervention (last patient)
Long term pain will be assessed using the modified Danish version of the Brief Pain Inventory - short form. The outcomes assessed will be an average score of pain severity items and interference items in accordance with the manual. The scales range from 0 to 10 (lower is less pain).
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Periprocedural pain perception
Time Frame: 90 days after intervention (last patient)
Perioperative pain will be scores using the visual analogue pain scale (range 0 - 10, low score is less pain).
90 days after intervention (last patient)
Longitudinal changes in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
Time Frame: 2 years after intervention (last patient)
Physicians assessment of global functioning using the "Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group" performance status scale (range 0 - 5, low score is better)
2 years after intervention (last patient)
Longitudinal changes in nutritional status assessment
Time Frame: 2 years after intervention (last patient)
Nutritional status assessment using the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (short form). The short form includes only patient reported measures and will be combined into a single score according to the manual (range 0 - 37, low score is better).
2 years after intervention (last patient)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Professor, DMSc, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Irreversible electroporation

3
Subscribe