Endovascular vs Surgical Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes (ESAVFO)

December 30, 2025 updated by: Alian Al-Balas, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred type of vascular access for dialysis, but many of them fail to mature. There are two techniques of creating AVFs either the traditional way with surgery( Surgical AVFs) or novel per-cutaneous technique Endo- AVFs.

Investigators will pilot an randomized clinical trial of endo-AVFs and surgical AVFs at University of Alabama at Birmingham to determine the feasibility of patient recruitment, randomization, and retention. This pilot study will set the stage for a full-scale randomized clinical trial in future.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred type of vascular access for dialysis, but many of them fail to mature. Despite concerted efforts to improve surgical AVF outcomes during the past 20 years, many new AVFs fail to mature, even after interventions to salvage them (assisted maturation). Postoperative ultrasounds of immature AVFs frequently demonstrate decreased flow with narrowing at the anastomosis . Surgically created AVFs typically have a 90o angle at the anastomosis, yet computational fluid dynamics suggest that an anastomotic angle <30o improves the flow hemodynamics. Therefore, there has been great interest in novel AVF technologies to limit vascular injury and improve flow dynamics and maturation rates. The new technology evaluated herein (endovascular AVF (endo-AVF) has the potential to achieve these goals and reduce the cost of vascular access care.

Endo-AVF, a novel per-cutaneous technique of AVF creation, was approved by the FDA in 2018, and has been used in U.S. hemodialysis patients . In contrast to the surgical technique (the current standard), this non-surgical approach (1) minimizes vascular injury at the time of AVF creation and (2) creates a channel between the artery and vein with an angle approaching 0o. These two features provide a scientific rationale for superior maturation compared with that of surgical AVF Investigators will perform a single-center, prospective pilot randomized clinical trial. Investigators will recruit 80 patients who have advanced chronic kidney disease or on hemodialysis with a catheter ,who there pre- operative Ultrasound showed they are eligible to surgical or endo-vascular AVF. Participants will be randomized to one of two groups: an surgical AVF intervention group that will undergo a routine surgical fistula creation, or an endo-vascular AVF intervention group will undergo per-cutaneous fistula creation . Participants will be followed for 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35201
        • UAB

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Study will include participants who are 18 years and older who are scheduled to have an AVF
  • preoperative ultrasound showed feasibility to have an endo-vascular AVF vs surgical upper arm AVF

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 18 years
  • participants eligible for low forearm AVF ( radio-cephalic)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Surgical AVFs
Participants who initiated dialysis with a catheter or have advanced chronic kidney disease ,these patients who an Surgical AVF intervention group that will undergo a routine surgical AVF creation.

Surgical fistula creation is standard surgical procedures, where a small cut through the skin is made to create a channel directly between a vein and artery .

The study procedures are standard clinical practice, and not considered an experimental procedure.

Experimental: Endo-vascular AVF
Participants who initiated dialysis with a catheter or have advanced chronic kidney disease ,these patients who an endo-vascular AVF intervention group that will undergo a per-cutaneous AVF creation.
Endovascular fistula creation is a minimally invasive procedure used to create a canal between close artery and vein at the forearm. A magnet attached to a catheter is passed over a guidewire into the artery while another magnet passed over the guidewire into the vein. The two magnets are aligned close to each other, then the radiofrequency electrode is released from the venous catheter and energized for 2 seconds, creating a channel between the vein and the artery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physiological fistula maturity
Time Frame: 0-6 weeks
Assess by ultrasound . To assess blood flow within the fistula.
0-6 weeks
Physiological fistula maturity
Time Frame: 0-6 weeks
Assess by ultrasound . To assess diameter of the fistula
0-6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical fistula maturity
Time Frame: 6 weeks-6 months
Assess by ultrasound. Able to use the fistula for dialysis
6 weeks-6 months
Fistula survival
Time Frame: 0-2 years
Assess by ultrasound. Continue to able to use fistula for dialysis
0-2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dialysis Fistula Creation

Clinical Trials on Surgical AVF

Subscribe