Effects of Periodized and Autoregulated Resistance Training in Haematological Cancer Patients During the Treatent.

May 27, 2020 updated by: Fabrício Edler Macagnan, Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Effects of Periodized and Autoregulated Resistance Training Programs in Haematological Cancer Patients Undergoing High-dose Chemotherapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the positive impact of physical functioning and fatigue in patients who received training programs during the myeloablative chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation. However, the heterogeneity among the forms of physical activity results in moderate to very low evidence available about benefits of physical exercise. In this randomized and controlled clinical trial, we will study the effects on physical performance and fatigue of periodic resistance training programs, with an autoregulated approach within a non-linear model, based on the individual patient response to cancer treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The sample will consist of 66 patients diagnosed with leukemia and lymphoma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy, with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, who will be randomized into two groups. The physical performance and fatigue outcomes will be compared between the control and the experimental group. The control group will perform an exercise program based on the standard protocol of physical therapy, consisting of bicycle ergometer endurance training for 5 minutes, with resistance individually adjusted based on the patient's feedback (from 70% of maximum heart rate) and resistance exercises for muscle groups hip flexors, knee extensors and ankle plantar flexors and resistance training form arms, with weigths of 0,5 to 1,0 kg (10 repetitions, 1 set).

The experimental group will perform a periodic resistance training program, with an auto-regulated and a non-linear model, using the Submaximal Ergometer tests with incremental load (from 85% of maximaum heart rate or maximum effort related), 30-Second Chair Stand, Hand Grip strenght and submaximal effort of arms with weights of 0,5 to 1,0 kg.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RS
      • Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90050-170
        • Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90050-170
        • Fabrício Edler Macagnan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients clinically diagnosed with Leukemia or Lymphoma, in the first or second line of treatment, undergoing high-dose chemotherapy, with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation;
  • Neurological and cognitive functions preserved;
  • Physical conditions that enable participation in physical rehabilitation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical Complications that contraindicate physical therapy exercises, including the practice of cycle ergometer and resistance exercises;
  • Previous musculoskeletal alteration that interferes in physical performance evaluation tests;
  • Recent cardiovascular or pulmonary disease;
  • Psychiatric or neurological disorder;
  • Inability to walk on its own or presence of bone metastasis;
  • Adherence on less than 50% of the total sessions of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Leukemia Control Group
In this group the exercise program will be based on the standard protocol of physical therapy.
  • Bicycle ergometer endurance training for 5 minutes, with resistance individually adjusted based on the patient´s feedback (from 70% of maximum heart rate);
  • Resistance exercises for muscle groups: hip flexors, knee extensors and ankle plantar flexors (10 repetitions, 1 sets);
  • Resistance training for arms, using 0,5 kg or 1,0 kg dumbbels (10 repetitions, 1 sets).
Experimental: Leukemia Experimental Group
In this group the exercise program will be based on a periodic resistance training program, with an autoregulated approach within a non-linear model, based on the individual's patient daily response.
  • Submaximal Ergometer tests with incremental load (from 85% of maximum heart rate or maximum effort related);
  • 30-Second Chair Stand;
  • Hand Grip Strength and submaximal arm effort using 0,5 kg or 1,0 kg dumbbels.
Active Comparator: Lymphoma Control Group
In this group the exercise program will be based on the standard protocol of physical therapy.
  • Bicycle ergometer endurance training for 5 minutes, with resistance individually adjusted based on the patient´s feedback (from 70% of maximum heart rate);
  • Resistance exercises for muscle groups: hip flexors, knee extensors and ankle plantar flexors (10 repetitions, 1 sets);
  • Resistance training for arms, using 0,5 kg or 1,0 kg dumbbels (10 repetitions, 1 sets).
Experimental: Lymphoma Experimental Group
In this group the exercise program will be based on a periodic resistance training program, with an autoregulated approach within a non-linear model, based on the individual's patient daily response.
  • Submaximal Ergometer tests with incremental load (from 85% of maximum heart rate or maximum effort related);
  • 30-Second Chair Stand;
  • Hand Grip Strength and submaximal arm effort using 0,5 kg or 1,0 kg dumbbels.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
Piper Fatigue Scale, developed by Piper et al. (1998), is a multidimensional measure of fatigue in the field of cancer research and includes subdomains of the behavioral, affective, sensorial and cognitive attributes / fatigue mood, composed of 22 items. The scores for each item range from 0 to 10 and can total 220 points. Higher values characterize a greater perception of fatigue. It will be applied on patient's evaluation day and on hospital discharge day.
Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
Physical Functioning Maximum Capacity
Time Frame: Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
To evaluate the maximum capacity and endurance of the participants of this study, based on the concept of periodization (volume, intensity and frequency) and self-regulation (volume, intensity and magnitude according to daily readiness of the patient), by Fairman et al., (2017), the patient will perform a submaximal incremental exercise test in a cycle ergometer with electromagnetic braking, keeping the cadence fixed throughout the whole period of the test; the workload will be adjusted progressively every 1 minute until it reaches 85% of maximum heart rate or until the patient reports fatigue. At each load increase, the evaluation of the perceived effort will be performed through the BORG scale. The load, time and distance variables will be evaluated daily.
Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
Lower Limb Physical Functioning and Strength
Time Frame: Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
The 30-Second Chair Stand evaluates lower limb strength and, indirectly, the risk of falls, especially in the elderly population (JONES, J., RIKLI, 2002). This way, it will compose the set of tests used to determine the physical performance by measuring the number of stands from an armless chair of standard height (45 cm) performed in 30 seconds. The test will be begin when the participant, seating on a neutral spine position and feet flat on the floor, will be instructed to rise to a full stand and return to the original seated position, as quickly as possible. The participant will be instructed to move at maximal speed until they either feel the need to stop or the 30-second time limit is reached. More than 8 unassisted stands for men and women are considered above average for their age, and those below the range as below average.
Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
Handgrip Strength Physical Functioning
Time Frame: Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
A standard adjustable-handle hydraulic dynamometer will be used to measure hand grip strength as an index of upper limb strength. The Jamar® dynamometer, developed by Bechtol (1954), is considered the most accepted instrument ("gold standard") and is recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT) for being simple, to enable a quick and direct reading of the data and to enable its use in different fields of research. Three measurements of the manual grip strength should be performed in both hands, considering that the maximum difference between them does not exceed 10%, and the average of these being considered as the maximum value.
Trough study completion, an average of 17 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healt-related quality of life: EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
General health-related quality of life will be assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), created as an initiative of the Quality of Life Group, from the EORTC (Aaronson et al., 1993) to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. The instrument is composed of 30 items, divided into five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), one scale that evaluates overall quality of life, five single terms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and one separate item to evaluate financial impact. Responses are given on a 4-point Likert scale, except for the items that evaluate overall quality of life (items 29 and 30), which are given on a 7-point Likert scale. It will be applied on the day of the patient's evaluation and on the day of hospital discharge.
Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
Symptoms Assessment
Time Frame: Trough study completion, an average of 17 months
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scalemorning will be applied to eavaluate symptoms of pain, tiredness, drowsiness, appetite, nausea, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety and well-being. It is a scale where the patient provides an auto-report on a score that can vary from 0 to 10, being score 0 absence of symptoms and 10 represents the most intense sensation experienced by the patient.
Trough study completion, an average of 17 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TMO-2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Standard protocol Leukemia

3
Subscribe